Cigarette Smoking with Serious Mental Illness: US Provider and Veteran Beliefs About How to Quit.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Corinne N Kacmarek, Eliana J Trikeriotis, Richard W Goldberg, Karen Besterman-Dahan
{"title":"Cigarette Smoking with Serious Mental Illness: US Provider and Veteran Beliefs About How to Quit.","authors":"Corinne N Kacmarek, Eliana J Trikeriotis, Richard W Goldberg, Karen Besterman-Dahan","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Veterans with serious mental illness (SMI) have high cigarette smoking rates and want to quit, but mental health providers are often reluctant to treat smoking. This study compared how providers and veterans in a United States Veteran Affairs Medical Center (VA) SMI clinics view smoking and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>20 SMI providers and 20 veterans with SMI who smoked cigarettes were interviewed. A rapid evaluation matrix approach was used to code interviews based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (attitudes, self-efficacy, and norms). This paper focuses on themes identified in the attitudes and self-efficacy domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Veterans had high interest in quitting smoking but low self-efficacy to quit. In regards to attitudes, veterans had specific beliefs about how and when to quit. Provider attitudes involved anticipating mixed interest in quitting among their veterans and anticipating low quit rates. Eighteen (90%) veterans were at least contemplating quitting. Many providers interpreted ambivalence about quitting as low readiness to quit and viewed the smoking/return-to-smoking cycle of addiction as an indicator that veterans with SMI could not quit. Veterans also believed they could not quit until they were \"ready\" or strong enough to do so, which impeded initiating smoking discussion with providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Providers and veterans share unhelpful attitudes about quitting smoking, which discouraged treatment and reinforced unhelpful attitudes. These qualitative findings shed light on the underlying mechanisms of infrequent tobacco treatment in mental health settings via the Theory of Planned Behavior to guide efforts to improve reach of tobacco treatment in these settings.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Comparing the perspectives of providers and veterans from the same setting is a rare contribution to tobacco treatment literature. Provider and veteran attitudes about quitting smoking interacted and led smoking to persist unaddressed despite veteran interest in quitting. Providers may benefit from education about how to effectively treat smoking to dispel myths that impede treatment and feel more comfortable integrating smoking treatment into routine care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Veterans with serious mental illness (SMI) have high cigarette smoking rates and want to quit, but mental health providers are often reluctant to treat smoking. This study compared how providers and veterans in a United States Veteran Affairs Medical Center (VA) SMI clinics view smoking and treatment.

Methods: 20 SMI providers and 20 veterans with SMI who smoked cigarettes were interviewed. A rapid evaluation matrix approach was used to code interviews based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (attitudes, self-efficacy, and norms). This paper focuses on themes identified in the attitudes and self-efficacy domains.

Results: Veterans had high interest in quitting smoking but low self-efficacy to quit. In regards to attitudes, veterans had specific beliefs about how and when to quit. Provider attitudes involved anticipating mixed interest in quitting among their veterans and anticipating low quit rates. Eighteen (90%) veterans were at least contemplating quitting. Many providers interpreted ambivalence about quitting as low readiness to quit and viewed the smoking/return-to-smoking cycle of addiction as an indicator that veterans with SMI could not quit. Veterans also believed they could not quit until they were "ready" or strong enough to do so, which impeded initiating smoking discussion with providers.

Conclusion: Providers and veterans share unhelpful attitudes about quitting smoking, which discouraged treatment and reinforced unhelpful attitudes. These qualitative findings shed light on the underlying mechanisms of infrequent tobacco treatment in mental health settings via the Theory of Planned Behavior to guide efforts to improve reach of tobacco treatment in these settings.

Implications: Comparing the perspectives of providers and veterans from the same setting is a rare contribution to tobacco treatment literature. Provider and veteran attitudes about quitting smoking interacted and led smoking to persist unaddressed despite veteran interest in quitting. Providers may benefit from education about how to effectively treat smoking to dispel myths that impede treatment and feel more comfortable integrating smoking treatment into routine care.

吸烟与严重精神疾病:美国提供者和退伍军人关于如何戒烟的信念。
简介:患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的退伍军人吸烟率高,想戒烟,但心理健康提供者往往不愿意治疗吸烟。这项研究比较了美国退伍军人事务医疗中心(VA) SMI诊所的服务提供者和退伍军人如何看待吸烟和治疗。方法:对20名重度精神分裂症提供者和20名吸烟的重度精神分裂症退伍军人进行访谈。基于计划行为理论(态度、自我效能和规范),采用快速评估矩阵方法对访谈进行编码。本文关注的是在态度和自我效能领域中确定的主题。结果:退伍军人戒烟兴趣高,但戒烟自我效能低。在态度方面,退伍军人对如何以及何时退出有特定的看法。提供者的态度包括预期退伍军人对戒烟的混合兴趣和预期低戒烟率。至少有18名(90%)退伍军人在考虑退役。许多医疗服务提供者将对戒烟的矛盾心理解释为戒烟的准备程度较低,并将吸烟/重新吸烟成瘾的循环视为重度精神障碍退伍军人无法戒烟的一个指标。退伍军人还认为,除非他们“准备好”或有足够的力量戒烟,否则他们无法戒烟,这阻碍了他们与医疗服务提供者就吸烟问题展开讨论。结论:医疗服务提供者和退伍军人对戒烟存在消极态度,这种态度阻碍了治疗,强化了消极态度。通过计划行为理论,这些定性发现揭示了在心理健康环境中不经常进行烟草治疗的潜在机制,以指导在这些环境中改善烟草治疗范围的努力。意义:比较提供者和退伍军人在相同环境下的观点是对烟草治疗文献的罕见贡献。提供者和退伍军人对戒烟的态度相互作用,导致吸烟持续存在,尽管退伍军人有戒烟的兴趣。提供者可能会从如何有效治疗吸烟的教育中受益,以消除阻碍治疗的神话,并更放心地将吸烟治疗纳入日常护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信