A randomized clinical trial comparing intranasal lidocaine and saline prior to gastroscopy.

IF 1 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Open Veterinary Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i6.62
Elizabeth Alvey, Langdon Fielding, Dustin Dennis, Diane Rhodes, Emma Deane, Jessica Bouton
{"title":"A randomized clinical trial comparing intranasal lidocaine and saline prior to gastroscopy.","authors":"Elizabeth Alvey, Langdon Fielding, Dustin Dennis, Diane Rhodes, Emma Deane, Jessica Bouton","doi":"10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i6.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intranasal lidocaine (LID) administration is a common treatment used to facilitate the passing of endoscopes and nasogastric tubes in horses. However, no research has supported its use in equine practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare patient reactivity and endoscope passage time between intranasal LID and intranasal saline prior to gastroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This blinded, randomized clinical trial included 25 horses presenting for gastroscopy. Following the administration of sedation and prior to gastroscopy, 10 ml of saline (CON) was administered intranasally to 12 horses in the control group, or 10 ml of 2% LID was administered intranasally to 13 horses in the LID group. The recorded data included signalment, location of scoping (field or hospital), sedation, grade of reactivity on a 6-point scale (0 for no reactivity up to five when the scope could not be passed), and time to passage from the nares to the cardia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time to reach the cardia in the CON group was 73 (35-183) seconds, and the time to reach the cardia in the LID group was 70 (45-210) seconds (<i>p</i> = 0.8). The number of horses with a reactivity grade less than or equal to 1 in the CON group was 75% (9/12) compared with 69% (9/13) in the LID group (<i>p</i> = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This small study did not identify any significant benefit from administering intranasal LID prior to endoscope passage.</p>","PeriodicalId":19531,"journal":{"name":"Open Veterinary Journal","volume":"15 6","pages":"2915-2918"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i6.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intranasal lidocaine (LID) administration is a common treatment used to facilitate the passing of endoscopes and nasogastric tubes in horses. However, no research has supported its use in equine practice.

Aim: To compare patient reactivity and endoscope passage time between intranasal LID and intranasal saline prior to gastroscopy.

Methods: This blinded, randomized clinical trial included 25 horses presenting for gastroscopy. Following the administration of sedation and prior to gastroscopy, 10 ml of saline (CON) was administered intranasally to 12 horses in the control group, or 10 ml of 2% LID was administered intranasally to 13 horses in the LID group. The recorded data included signalment, location of scoping (field or hospital), sedation, grade of reactivity on a 6-point scale (0 for no reactivity up to five when the scope could not be passed), and time to passage from the nares to the cardia.

Results: The time to reach the cardia in the CON group was 73 (35-183) seconds, and the time to reach the cardia in the LID group was 70 (45-210) seconds (p = 0.8). The number of horses with a reactivity grade less than or equal to 1 in the CON group was 75% (9/12) compared with 69% (9/13) in the LID group (p = 0.12).

Conclusion: This small study did not identify any significant benefit from administering intranasal LID prior to endoscope passage.

一项比较胃镜检查前鼻内利多卡因和生理盐水的随机临床试验。
背景:鼻内给药利多卡因(LID)是一种常用的治疗方法,用于马的内窥镜和鼻胃管的通过。然而,没有研究支持它在马的实践中使用。目的:比较胃镜检查前鼻内LID和鼻内盐水的患者反应性和内镜通过时间。方法:这项盲法、随机临床试验包括25匹接受胃镜检查的马。在给予镇静和胃镜检查之前,对照组的12匹马经鼻给予10ml生理盐水(CON),或LID组的13匹马经鼻给予10ml 2%的LID。记录的数据包括信号、观察位置(野外或医院)、镇静、反应性等级(6分制)(0分表示无反应,5分表示无法通过观察),以及从心脏到心脏的时间。结果:CON组到达心脏的时间为73(35-183)秒,LID组到达心脏的时间为70(45-210)秒(p = 0.8)。CON组反应等级小于或等于1的马的数量为75%(9/12),而LID组为69% (9/13)(p = 0.12)。结论:这项小型研究没有发现在内窥镜通过前给予鼻内LID有任何显著的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Veterinary Journal
Open Veterinary Journal VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Veterinary Journal is a peer-reviewed international open access online and printed journal that publishes high-quality original research articles. reviews, short communications and case reports dedicated to all aspects of veterinary sciences and its related subjects. Research areas include the following: Infectious diseases of zoonotic/food-borne importance, applied biochemistry, parasitology, endocrinology, microbiology, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, epidemiology, molecular biology, immunogenetics, surgery, ophthalmology, dermatology, oncology and animal reproduction. All papers are peer-reviewed. Moreover, with the presence of well-qualified group of international referees, the process of publication will be done meticulously and to the highest standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信