{"title":"Family-based interventions for optimal blood pressure outcomes in adults: a cluster randomised controlled trial in India.","authors":"Panniyammakal Jeemon, Thottathan Athira, Thoniparambil Ravindranathanpillai Lekha, Sunaib Ismail, Sanjay Ganapathi, Sivadasanpillai Harikrishnan","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Globally, hypertension is a prominent risk factor for disability and death. We assessed the effectiveness of a family-centred strategy for lowering blood pressure in high-risk families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Engaging families as intervention units, we conducted an open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02771873). First-degree family members and spouses of those suffering from coronary heart disease (CHD) over the age of 18 were included in the trial. The chosen families were allocated in a ratio of 1 : 1 to the enhanced usual care and intervention arms. The interventions included cardiovascular disease risk screening, systematic lifestyle modifications, facilitating access to primary healthcare services, and ensuring self-care adherence through regular follow-up. We measured the blood pressure at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months using electronic devices. A generalised estimating equation model assessed the between-group population average variation in DBP and SBP levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial involved 1671 participants (women = 1111, mean age = 40.8 years) from 750 families. At the 2-year follow-up, the attrition rate was 3%. The adjusted between-group population average differences in SBP and DBP were -5.23 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -7.01 to -3.47, P < 0.001, and -2.56 mmHg, 95% CI -3.63 to -1.49, P < 0.001, respectively. The odds of blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg at 2-year follow-up was 25% lower in the intervention than the usual care arm (odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.95, P = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Family-centred lifestyle interventions may yield significant public health benefits in maintaining optimal blood pressure in high-risk individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"1871-1877"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Globally, hypertension is a prominent risk factor for disability and death. We assessed the effectiveness of a family-centred strategy for lowering blood pressure in high-risk families.
Methods: Engaging families as intervention units, we conducted an open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02771873). First-degree family members and spouses of those suffering from coronary heart disease (CHD) over the age of 18 were included in the trial. The chosen families were allocated in a ratio of 1 : 1 to the enhanced usual care and intervention arms. The interventions included cardiovascular disease risk screening, systematic lifestyle modifications, facilitating access to primary healthcare services, and ensuring self-care adherence through regular follow-up. We measured the blood pressure at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months using electronic devices. A generalised estimating equation model assessed the between-group population average variation in DBP and SBP levels.
Results: The trial involved 1671 participants (women = 1111, mean age = 40.8 years) from 750 families. At the 2-year follow-up, the attrition rate was 3%. The adjusted between-group population average differences in SBP and DBP were -5.23 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -7.01 to -3.47, P < 0.001, and -2.56 mmHg, 95% CI -3.63 to -1.49, P < 0.001, respectively. The odds of blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg at 2-year follow-up was 25% lower in the intervention than the usual care arm (odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.95, P = 0.017).
Conclusion: Family-centred lifestyle interventions may yield significant public health benefits in maintaining optimal blood pressure in high-risk individuals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.