Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus: A Retrospective Study Using Coarsened Exact Matching.

IF 1.5 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v20.15222
Farid Karimian, Kiana Hassanpour, Farbod Semnani, Sepehr Feizi, Mohammad Ali Javadi, Amir Faramarzi, Mohammadreza Jafarinasab
{"title":"Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus: A Retrospective Study Using Coarsened Exact Matching.","authors":"Farid Karimian, Kiana Hassanpour, Farbod Semnani, Sepehr Feizi, Mohammad Ali Javadi, Amir Faramarzi, Mohammadreza Jafarinasab","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v20.15222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the graft survival rates and visual outcomes in patients with keratoconus (KCN) undergoing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) versus penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and identify possible risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective longitudinal study enrolled patients with KCN who underwent corneal transplantation at Labbafinejad Medical Center (Tehran, Iran) between 2006 and 2016. We utilized a one-to-one coarsened exact matching (CEM) approach. Matching considered the recipient's sex, donor age, and the presence and extent of corneal neovascularization in the recipient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 213 patients with KCN who underwent PKP (49.8%; <i>n</i> = 106) or DALK (50.2%; <i>n</i> = 107) were enrolled. After CEM was performed, 67 patients in the PKP group were well-matched with 67 patients in the DALK group. There was no significant difference in terms of baseline characteristics between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the percentage of patients free of graft rejection in a one- and three-year follow-up was 78.7% and 74.5% in the PKP group, and 95.3% and 95.3% in the DALK group, respectively. On univariate analysis, the strongest risk factor predictive of graft rejection was corneal vascularization in both the PKP and DALK groups, followed by recipient age only in the PKP group and dry eye disease only in the DALK group. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, PKP was identified as an independent predictor of graft rejection, but not of graft failure. The DALK and PKP groups were comparable in terms of postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; <i>P =</i> 0.48) and suture complications (<i>P =</i> 0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with KCN, DALK demonstrated comparable outcomes to PKP in terms of BCVA, but showed superiority in graft rejection-free survival. Corneal vascularization was the major recipient risk factor for graft rejection and failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"20 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12438944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v20.15222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the graft survival rates and visual outcomes in patients with keratoconus (KCN) undergoing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) versus penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and identify possible risk factors.

Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study enrolled patients with KCN who underwent corneal transplantation at Labbafinejad Medical Center (Tehran, Iran) between 2006 and 2016. We utilized a one-to-one coarsened exact matching (CEM) approach. Matching considered the recipient's sex, donor age, and the presence and extent of corneal neovascularization in the recipient.

Results: A total of 213 patients with KCN who underwent PKP (49.8%; n = 106) or DALK (50.2%; n = 107) were enrolled. After CEM was performed, 67 patients in the PKP group were well-matched with 67 patients in the DALK group. There was no significant difference in terms of baseline characteristics between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the percentage of patients free of graft rejection in a one- and three-year follow-up was 78.7% and 74.5% in the PKP group, and 95.3% and 95.3% in the DALK group, respectively. On univariate analysis, the strongest risk factor predictive of graft rejection was corneal vascularization in both the PKP and DALK groups, followed by recipient age only in the PKP group and dry eye disease only in the DALK group. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, PKP was identified as an independent predictor of graft rejection, but not of graft failure. The DALK and PKP groups were comparable in terms of postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; P = 0.48) and suture complications (P = 0.87).

Conclusion: In patients with KCN, DALK demonstrated comparable outcomes to PKP in terms of BCVA, but showed superiority in graft rejection-free survival. Corneal vascularization was the major recipient risk factor for graft rejection and failure.

圆锥角膜的深前板层角膜移植术与穿透性角膜移植术:采用粗化精确匹配的回顾性研究。
目的:比较圆锥角膜(KCN)患者行深前板层角膜移植术(DALK)与穿透性角膜移植术(PKP)的移植存活率和视力结果,并确定可能的危险因素。方法:本回顾性纵向研究纳入了2006年至2016年在伊朗德黑兰Labbafinejad医疗中心接受角膜移植的KCN患者。我们使用了一对一的粗精确匹配(CEM)方法。匹配考虑了受者的性别、供者的年龄以及受者角膜新生血管的存在和程度。结果:共有213例KCN患者接受PKP (49.8%, n = 106)或DALK (50.2%, n = 107)。行CEM后,PKP组67例患者与DALK组67例患者匹配良好。两组在基线特征方面无显著差异。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,PKP组1年和3年随访中无移植排斥反应的患者比例分别为78.7%和74.5%,DALK组为95.3%和95.3%。在单因素分析中,PKP组和DALK组中预测移植排斥反应的最强危险因素是角膜血管化,其次是PKP组的受体年龄和DALK组的干眼症。在多变量Cox回归分析中,PKP被确定为移植物排斥反应的独立预测因子,但不是移植物衰竭的预测因子。DALK组和PKP组在术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA, P = 0.48)和缝合并发症(P = 0.87)方面具有可比性。结论:在KCN患者中,DALK在BCVA方面表现出与PKP相当的结果,但在移植物无排斥生存方面表现出优势。角膜血管化是移植排斥和失败的主要受体危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信