Time in remission from depression predicts cognitive-affective regulation dynamics in everyday life.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Umiemah Farrukh, Sarah L Zapetis, Janet Li, Ellie P Xu, Jonathan P Stange
{"title":"Time in remission from depression predicts cognitive-affective regulation dynamics in everyday life.","authors":"Umiemah Farrukh, Sarah L Zapetis, Janet Li, Ellie P Xu, Jonathan P Stange","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2549369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Impairment in affect regulation continues even after remission from depression. However, little is known about whether difficulties in affect regulation persist or improve as time in remission grows and how they manifest in everyday life. With the aim of addressing this gap, we hypothesized that greater time in remission would correspond with more positive affect and perceived regulatory success, and with less negative affect, perseverative cognition, and momentary impulsivity. An exploratory aim was to determine whether executive dysfunction would mediate relationships between time in remission and regulatory outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A sample of 42 young adults with remitted major depressive disorder completed ecological momentary assessments, which included measures of positive and negative affect, perseverative cognition (rumination and worry), perceived regulatory success, and momentary impulsivity multiple times per day across the assessment period. Each person's mean level and variability of these constructs was computed and time in remission was calculated using a semi-structured clinical interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analyses indicated that a shorter time in remission predicted higher levels of negative affect, perseverative cognition, and momentary impulsivity and less perceived success with regulating affect in everyday life (<i>p</i>s < .05). Shorter time in remission also predicted more variability in perseverative cognition and positive and negative affect.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although cognitive-affective processes often are conceptualized as traits, our data indicate that these measures are dynamic, fluctuating across the course of a week. Several of these processes also appear to attenuate and stabilize as depressive episodes become more distal. These findings have important clinical implications, suggesting that remitted individuals may continue to benefit from interventions to reduce impulsive and perseverative cognitive-behavioral patterns and improve regulation success and affective stability. Interventions may have particular utility earlier in remission when these skills may be more impaired, with the goal of restoring functioning and reducing the likelihood of relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2549369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Impairment in affect regulation continues even after remission from depression. However, little is known about whether difficulties in affect regulation persist or improve as time in remission grows and how they manifest in everyday life. With the aim of addressing this gap, we hypothesized that greater time in remission would correspond with more positive affect and perceived regulatory success, and with less negative affect, perseverative cognition, and momentary impulsivity. An exploratory aim was to determine whether executive dysfunction would mediate relationships between time in remission and regulatory outcomes.

Method: A sample of 42 young adults with remitted major depressive disorder completed ecological momentary assessments, which included measures of positive and negative affect, perseverative cognition (rumination and worry), perceived regulatory success, and momentary impulsivity multiple times per day across the assessment period. Each person's mean level and variability of these constructs was computed and time in remission was calculated using a semi-structured clinical interview.

Results: Regression analyses indicated that a shorter time in remission predicted higher levels of negative affect, perseverative cognition, and momentary impulsivity and less perceived success with regulating affect in everyday life (ps < .05). Shorter time in remission also predicted more variability in perseverative cognition and positive and negative affect.

Discussion: Although cognitive-affective processes often are conceptualized as traits, our data indicate that these measures are dynamic, fluctuating across the course of a week. Several of these processes also appear to attenuate and stabilize as depressive episodes become more distal. These findings have important clinical implications, suggesting that remitted individuals may continue to benefit from interventions to reduce impulsive and perseverative cognitive-behavioral patterns and improve regulation success and affective stability. Interventions may have particular utility earlier in remission when these skills may be more impaired, with the goal of restoring functioning and reducing the likelihood of relapse.

抑郁症缓解时间预测日常生活中的认知-情感调节动态。
引言:即使在抑郁症缓解后,情感调节的损害仍在继续。然而,对于情感调节的困难是否会随着缓解时间的延长而持续或改善,以及它们在日常生活中如何表现,人们知之甚少。为了解决这一差距,我们假设更长的缓解时间与更多的积极影响和感知的调节成功相对应,与更少的消极影响、持久性认知和瞬间冲动相对应。探索性目的是确定执行功能障碍是否会介导缓解时间和调节结果之间的关系。方法:选取42例重度抑郁症缓解的年轻成人,在评估期间每天多次完成生态瞬间评估,包括积极和消极情绪、持续性认知(反刍和担忧)、感知调节成功和瞬间冲动的测量。使用半结构化临床访谈计算每个人的平均水平和这些结构的变异性,并计算缓解时间。结果:回归分析表明,缓解时间越短,负面情绪、持续性认知和瞬间冲动的水平越高,在日常生活中调节情绪的成功程度越低(ps讨论:尽管认知-情感过程通常被概念化为特征,但我们的数据表明,这些测量是动态的,在一周的过程中波动。其中一些过程也随着抑郁发作变得更远而减弱和稳定。这些发现具有重要的临床意义,表明缓解个体可能继续受益于干预,以减少冲动性和持久性认知行为模式,提高调节成功率和情感稳定性。干预措施可能在缓解早期有特别的效用,因为这些技能可能受损更严重,目的是恢复功能和减少复发的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信