Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Thickness and Lumbopelvic Control Among Women With and Without Different Severity of Stress Urinary Incontinence.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ui-Jae Hwang, Oh-Yun Kwon, Minju Kim
{"title":"Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Thickness and Lumbopelvic Control Among Women With and Without Different Severity of Stress Urinary Incontinence.","authors":"Ui-Jae Hwang, Oh-Yun Kwon, Minju Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06286-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may be related to dysfunction of the core stabilizing system. We hypothesized that women with more severe SUI would demonstrate reduced abdominal-muscle thickness and decreased lumbopelvic control. This study investigated differences in abdominal-muscle thickness and lumbopelvic control among women with different SUI severities compared with continent women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 54 women: 21 women with mild SUI, 12 women with moderate SUI, and 21 healthy controls. Abdominal-muscle thickness was measured using ultrasonography. Lumbopelvic control was assessed using one- and double-leg-lowering tests. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc tests were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with both mild and moderate SUI demonstrated significantly reduced thickness of the transversus abdominis (p < 0.01), internal oblique (p < 0.01), and external oblique muscles (p < 0.01). The SUI groups also exhibited lower angles in the one-leg-lowering test (control = 67.04 ± 20.78°; mild SUI = 46.25 ± 31.43°; moderate SUI = 34.31 ± 32.10°; p < 0.01) and the double-leg-lowering test (control = 45.19 ± 24.56°; mild SUI = 28.96 ± 23.90°; moderate SUI = 24.38 ± 26.17°; p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with SUI demonstrated significantly reduced abdominal-muscle thickness and lower performance on lumbopelvic control tests than continent women, with more pronounced deficits in moderate SUI. These findings highlight alterations in the core stabilizing system associated with SUI severity. Comprehensive rehabilitation approaches addressing both pelvic-floor and core-muscle function may be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06286-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may be related to dysfunction of the core stabilizing system. We hypothesized that women with more severe SUI would demonstrate reduced abdominal-muscle thickness and decreased lumbopelvic control. This study investigated differences in abdominal-muscle thickness and lumbopelvic control among women with different SUI severities compared with continent women.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 54 women: 21 women with mild SUI, 12 women with moderate SUI, and 21 healthy controls. Abdominal-muscle thickness was measured using ultrasonography. Lumbopelvic control was assessed using one- and double-leg-lowering tests. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc tests were used for data analysis.

Results: Women with both mild and moderate SUI demonstrated significantly reduced thickness of the transversus abdominis (p < 0.01), internal oblique (p < 0.01), and external oblique muscles (p < 0.01). The SUI groups also exhibited lower angles in the one-leg-lowering test (control = 67.04 ± 20.78°; mild SUI = 46.25 ± 31.43°; moderate SUI = 34.31 ± 32.10°; p < 0.01) and the double-leg-lowering test (control = 45.19 ± 24.56°; mild SUI = 28.96 ± 23.90°; moderate SUI = 24.38 ± 26.17°; p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Women with SUI demonstrated significantly reduced abdominal-muscle thickness and lower performance on lumbopelvic control tests than continent women, with more pronounced deficits in moderate SUI. These findings highlight alterations in the core stabilizing system associated with SUI severity. Comprehensive rehabilitation approaches addressing both pelvic-floor and core-muscle function may be beneficial.

不同程度压力性尿失禁妇女腹肌厚度和腰骨盆控制的比较。
简介与假设:压力性尿失禁(SUI)可能与核心稳定系统功能障碍有关。我们假设患有更严重SUI的女性会表现出腹部肌肉厚度减少和腰盆腔控制能力下降。本研究调查了不同SUI严重程度女性与大陆女性在腹部肌肉厚度和腰骨盆控制方面的差异。方法:本横断面研究纳入54名女性:21名轻度SUI女性,12名中度SUI女性和21名健康对照。采用超声测量腹部肌肉厚度。采用单下肢和双下肢下放试验评估腰骨盆控制。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和事后检验。结果:患有轻度和中度SUI的女性表现出明显的腹横肌厚度减少(p结论:患有SUI的女性表现出明显的腹部肌肉厚度减少,在腰盆腔控制测试中的表现低于大陆女性,中度SUI的缺陷更明显。这些发现强调了与SUI严重程度相关的核心稳定系统的改变。针对骨盆底和核心肌肉功能的综合康复方法可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信