An evidence-based pulsatile tinnitus clinical workflow: A systematic review of literature.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
João Victor Sanders, Kiffon Keigher, Marion Oliver, Demetrius Lopes, Krishna Joshi
{"title":"An evidence-based pulsatile tinnitus clinical workflow: A systematic review of literature.","authors":"João Victor Sanders, Kiffon Keigher, Marion Oliver, Demetrius Lopes, Krishna Joshi","doi":"10.1177/15910199251380393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionEndovascular management options for pulsatile tinnitus (PT) patients have increased in recent years with promising results. However, standardized endovascular team referral criteria remain limited. We conducted a systematic review and suggested an evidence-based referral protocol for PT patients to the neuroendovascular team.MethodsA literature review was conducted in February 2025 using the PubMed/MEDLINE database. We included English-written studies published in the last 5 years, focusing on PT diagnosis and management. Exclusion criteria included: (1) in vitro or animal studies, (2) studies focused on open surgery approaches, (3) studies addressing only non-PT, and (4) case reports, case series (3-10 cases), commentaries, letters to the editor, editorials, and book chapters.ResultsOur initial search retrieved 257 papers. Of these, 219 were excluded after reading the title and abstract, and an additional 12 were excluded after full-text review. A total of 26 papers were eligible for inclusion in this review and in developing our protocol. After PT diagnosis and imaging, our protocol consists of the following three questions: (1) Is non-invasive imaging suspicious for a dural arteriovenous fistula, high-risk vascular lesions, or idiopathic intracranial hypertension? (2) Despite normal neuroimaging, is there clinical suspicion of a high-risk vascular lesion? (3) Although a low-risk lesion is diagnosed, is PT debilitating? If there is a \"yes\" to any of these questions, referral to the endovascular team is recommended.ConclusionWe suggested an evidence-based referral protocol for PT patients to the neuroendovascular team.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251380393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251380393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionEndovascular management options for pulsatile tinnitus (PT) patients have increased in recent years with promising results. However, standardized endovascular team referral criteria remain limited. We conducted a systematic review and suggested an evidence-based referral protocol for PT patients to the neuroendovascular team.MethodsA literature review was conducted in February 2025 using the PubMed/MEDLINE database. We included English-written studies published in the last 5 years, focusing on PT diagnosis and management. Exclusion criteria included: (1) in vitro or animal studies, (2) studies focused on open surgery approaches, (3) studies addressing only non-PT, and (4) case reports, case series (3-10 cases), commentaries, letters to the editor, editorials, and book chapters.ResultsOur initial search retrieved 257 papers. Of these, 219 were excluded after reading the title and abstract, and an additional 12 were excluded after full-text review. A total of 26 papers were eligible for inclusion in this review and in developing our protocol. After PT diagnosis and imaging, our protocol consists of the following three questions: (1) Is non-invasive imaging suspicious for a dural arteriovenous fistula, high-risk vascular lesions, or idiopathic intracranial hypertension? (2) Despite normal neuroimaging, is there clinical suspicion of a high-risk vascular lesion? (3) Although a low-risk lesion is diagnosed, is PT debilitating? If there is a "yes" to any of these questions, referral to the endovascular team is recommended.ConclusionWe suggested an evidence-based referral protocol for PT patients to the neuroendovascular team.

循证搏动性耳鸣临床工作流程:文献系统综述。
近年来,脉冲性耳鸣(PT)患者的血管内治疗选择有所增加,结果令人鼓舞。然而,标准化的血管内小组转诊标准仍然有限。我们进行了一项系统的回顾,并提出了一个以证据为基础的PT患者转介到神经血管内小组的方案。方法于2025年2月使用PubMed/MEDLINE数据库进行文献综述。我们收录了近5年发表的关于PT诊断和治疗的英文论文。排除标准包括:(1)体外或动物研究,(2)关注开放手术入路的研究,(3)仅针对非pt的研究,以及(4)病例报告、病例系列(3-10例)、评论、给编辑的信、社论和书籍章节。结果初步检索到257篇论文。其中219人在阅读标题和摘要后被排除,另外12人在全文审阅后被排除。共有26篇论文符合纳入本综述和制定我们的方案的条件。在PT诊断和成像后,我们的方案包括以下三个问题:(1)无创成像是否怀疑硬脑膜动静脉瘘、高危血管病变或特发性颅内高压?(2)尽管神经影像学正常,临床是否怀疑存在高危血管病变?(3)虽然诊断为低风险病变,但PT会使人衰弱吗?如果以上任何一个问题的回答是肯定的,建议转到血管内组。结论我们建议为PT患者提供循证转诊方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信