The AI inflection point in clinical neuropsychology: a call to action.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anastasia Serafimovska, Kirsten L Challinor, Tony Florio
{"title":"The AI inflection point in clinical neuropsychology: a call to action.","authors":"Anastasia Serafimovska, Kirsten L Challinor, Tony Florio","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2561162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary explores the rapidly evolving role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in clinical neuropsychology, offering a critical framework for its responsible integration. Drawing on recent work that used AI to automate a neuropsychological screening tool; the article discusses key fears about AI and its more tangible risks, across safety, privacy, diagnostic bias, \"erosion\" of clinical judgment, and a lack of transparency. Rather than a disruptive or displacing force, this commentary argues that it represents a natural evolution of the historical shared commitment within neuropsychology and AI research to understand learning and adaptation. Key ideas are explored that highlight the value of AI as a powerful augmentative tool that automates discrete tasks, freeing neuropsychologists to focus on higher-level clinical and ethical duties. It concludes that whilst AI will not replace neuropsychologists, it is already permanently reshaping clinical workflows, decision-making and the broader contours of practice, as other key technological advances have historically achieved. Therefore, cultivating AI literacy is a fundamental step in effectively responding as opposed to reacting to these global changes. It dually challenges and positions our professional community to actively define sound ethical parameters, uphold scientific rigor, and ultimately leverage automation to enhance equitable access to high quality care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2561162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary explores the rapidly evolving role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in clinical neuropsychology, offering a critical framework for its responsible integration. Drawing on recent work that used AI to automate a neuropsychological screening tool; the article discusses key fears about AI and its more tangible risks, across safety, privacy, diagnostic bias, "erosion" of clinical judgment, and a lack of transparency. Rather than a disruptive or displacing force, this commentary argues that it represents a natural evolution of the historical shared commitment within neuropsychology and AI research to understand learning and adaptation. Key ideas are explored that highlight the value of AI as a powerful augmentative tool that automates discrete tasks, freeing neuropsychologists to focus on higher-level clinical and ethical duties. It concludes that whilst AI will not replace neuropsychologists, it is already permanently reshaping clinical workflows, decision-making and the broader contours of practice, as other key technological advances have historically achieved. Therefore, cultivating AI literacy is a fundamental step in effectively responding as opposed to reacting to these global changes. It dually challenges and positions our professional community to actively define sound ethical parameters, uphold scientific rigor, and ultimately leverage automation to enhance equitable access to high quality care.

临床神经心理学中的人工智能拐点:行动的呼唤。
这篇评论探讨了人工智能(AI)在临床神经心理学中迅速发展的作用,为其负责任的整合提供了一个关键框架。借鉴最近使用人工智能自动化神经心理学筛查工具的工作;这篇文章讨论了对人工智能的主要担忧及其更切实的风险,包括安全、隐私、诊断偏见、临床判断的“侵蚀”以及缺乏透明度。这篇评论认为,它不是一种破坏性或取代性的力量,而是神经心理学和人工智能研究中理解学习和适应的历史共同承诺的自然演变。重点探讨了人工智能作为一种强大的辅助工具的价值,它可以自动完成离散的任务,使神经心理学家能够专注于更高层次的临床和道德职责。报告的结论是,虽然人工智能不会取代神经心理学家,但它已经永久性地重塑了临床工作流程、决策和更广泛的实践轮廓,就像其他关键技术进步在历史上所取得的成就一样。因此,培养人工智能素养是有效应对这些全球变化的基本步骤。它对我们的专业社区提出了双重挑战,要求我们积极定义合理的道德参数,坚持科学的严密性,并最终利用自动化来提高公平获得高质量护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信