Beta-Band Corticomuscular Coherence: A Novel Biomarker of Functional Corticospinal Tract Integrity and Motor Recovery After Stroke

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jingyao Sun;Qilu Zhang;Di Ma;Tianyu Jia;Shijie Jia;Xiaoxue Zhai;Ruimou Xie;Ping-Ju Lin;Zhibin Li;Yu Pan;Linhong Ji;Chong Li
{"title":"Beta-Band Corticomuscular Coherence: A Novel Biomarker of Functional Corticospinal Tract Integrity and Motor Recovery After Stroke","authors":"Jingyao Sun;Qilu Zhang;Di Ma;Tianyu Jia;Shijie Jia;Xiaoxue Zhai;Ruimou Xie;Ping-Ju Lin;Zhibin Li;Yu Pan;Linhong Ji;Chong Li","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3613417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Upper-limb motor impairment following stroke predominantly results from the damage to corticospinal tract (CST) integrity. Current clinical assessments of CST integrity face significant limitations, including high costs, specialized equipment, and inability to guide state-dependent closed-loop rehabilitation therapies. Corticomuscular coherence (CMC), which measures the functional coupling between sensorimotor cortical rhythms and muscular activity, represents a potentially accessible, and clinically feasible alternative for evaluating CST damage in stroke patients. However, it remains unclear whether CMC is a reliable biomarker of CST integrity and poststroke motor recovery. To address this issue, we measured electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG) and motor-evoked potential (MEP) status from subacute patients during grip and finger extension tasks performed with both affected and unaffected hands. Using a multivariate analysis approach, we identified abnormal modulations of CMC and event-related desynchronization (ERD), characterized by frequency-specific disruptions and distinctive spatial distributions. Crucially, our results also demonstrated that CMC reflects neurophysiological mechanisms distinct from cortical activation. Further analysis revealed significant CMC differences between patient groups stratified by MEP status, and confirmed the predictive value of CMC features for assessing functional CST integrity. Additionally, there existed significant associations between beta-band CMC and clinical motor assessments. These findings highlight the potential utility of CMC as a valuable tool for assessing functional CST integrity and motor recovery after stroke.","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"33 ","pages":"3856-3865"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11176878","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11176878/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Upper-limb motor impairment following stroke predominantly results from the damage to corticospinal tract (CST) integrity. Current clinical assessments of CST integrity face significant limitations, including high costs, specialized equipment, and inability to guide state-dependent closed-loop rehabilitation therapies. Corticomuscular coherence (CMC), which measures the functional coupling between sensorimotor cortical rhythms and muscular activity, represents a potentially accessible, and clinically feasible alternative for evaluating CST damage in stroke patients. However, it remains unclear whether CMC is a reliable biomarker of CST integrity and poststroke motor recovery. To address this issue, we measured electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG) and motor-evoked potential (MEP) status from subacute patients during grip and finger extension tasks performed with both affected and unaffected hands. Using a multivariate analysis approach, we identified abnormal modulations of CMC and event-related desynchronization (ERD), characterized by frequency-specific disruptions and distinctive spatial distributions. Crucially, our results also demonstrated that CMC reflects neurophysiological mechanisms distinct from cortical activation. Further analysis revealed significant CMC differences between patient groups stratified by MEP status, and confirmed the predictive value of CMC features for assessing functional CST integrity. Additionally, there existed significant associations between beta-band CMC and clinical motor assessments. These findings highlight the potential utility of CMC as a valuable tool for assessing functional CST integrity and motor recovery after stroke.
β带皮质肌肉一致性:脑卒中后皮质脊髓束功能完整性和运动恢复的新生物标志物。
中风后上肢运动障碍主要是由于皮质脊髓束(CST)完整性受损。目前对CST完整性的临床评估面临着很大的局限性,包括高成本、专用设备和无法指导依赖状态的闭环康复治疗。皮质肌肉一致性(CMC)测量感觉运动皮层节律和肌肉活动之间的功能耦合,是评估脑卒中患者CST损伤的一种潜在的、临床可行的替代方法。然而,CMC是否是CST完整性和脑卒中后运动恢复的可靠生物标志物尚不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们测量了亚急性患者在用受影响和未受影响的手进行握力和手指伸展任务时的脑电图(EEG)、肌电图(EMG)和运动诱发电位(MEP)状态。使用多变量分析方法,我们确定了CMC和事件相关不同步(ERD)的异常调制,其特征是频率特定的中断和独特的空间分布。至关重要的是,我们的结果还表明,CMC反映了不同于皮层激活的神经生理机制。进一步分析显示,按MEP状态分层的患者组间CMC差异显著,并证实了CMC特征对评估功能CST完整性的预测价值。此外,β -带CMC与临床运动评估之间存在显著关联。这些发现强调了CMC作为评估中风后CST功能完整性和运动恢复的有价值工具的潜在效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信