Corneal Biomechanical Alterations in Eyes After Radial Keratotomy Compared With Keratoconus.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yuri Iwamoto, Shizuka Koh, Ryota Inoue, Renato Ambrósio, Naoyuki Maeda, Kohji Nishida
{"title":"Corneal Biomechanical Alterations in Eyes After Radial Keratotomy Compared With Keratoconus.","authors":"Yuri Iwamoto, Shizuka Koh, Ryota Inoue, Renato Ambrósio, Naoyuki Maeda, Kohji Nishida","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250922-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the corneal biomechanical characteristics of eyes after radial keratotomy (RK) versus eyes with keratoconus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective case-control study, 15 eyes of 8 post-RK patients, 20 eyes of 20 age-matched patients with keratoconus, and 20 eyes of 20 normal control participants were assessed. Using an air pulse device with dynamic Scheimpflug imaging, corneal biomechanical parameters, including time, velocity, deformation amplitude, and deflection amplitude/length/area, were measured during deformation. Parameters for comprehensive biomechanical screening and ectasia detection were also recorded. In total, 27 corneal biomechanical parameters among the post-RK, keratoconus, and control groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant differences in 21 parameters between the post-RK and keratoconus groups and 18 parameters between the post-RK and control groups (<i>P</i> < .05, all). Seventeen of the 21 parameters, including deflection amplitude/length/area, were significantly greater in the post-RK group than in both the keratoconus and control groups (<i>P</i> < .05). Eight parameters in both the post-RK and keratoconus groups were significantly different from those in the control group (<i>P</i> < .05, all). Although less corneal stiffness was observed in the post-RK and keratoconus groups than in the control group, radius-related parameters, the ratio between the deformation amplitude at the apex and at 2 mm, and the difference in corneal thickness from the center to the periphery differed between the post-RK and keratoconus groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dynamic Scheimpflug imaging quantitatively demonstrated that the mechanism of decreased corneal biomechanical characteristics in post-RK eyes differs from that in eyes with keratoconus, which generally causes localized corneal thinning and protrusion around the corneal apex.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 8","pages":"e822-e830"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250922-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the corneal biomechanical characteristics of eyes after radial keratotomy (RK) versus eyes with keratoconus.

Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 15 eyes of 8 post-RK patients, 20 eyes of 20 age-matched patients with keratoconus, and 20 eyes of 20 normal control participants were assessed. Using an air pulse device with dynamic Scheimpflug imaging, corneal biomechanical parameters, including time, velocity, deformation amplitude, and deflection amplitude/length/area, were measured during deformation. Parameters for comprehensive biomechanical screening and ectasia detection were also recorded. In total, 27 corneal biomechanical parameters among the post-RK, keratoconus, and control groups were compared.

Results: There were statistically significant differences in 21 parameters between the post-RK and keratoconus groups and 18 parameters between the post-RK and control groups (P < .05, all). Seventeen of the 21 parameters, including deflection amplitude/length/area, were significantly greater in the post-RK group than in both the keratoconus and control groups (P < .05). Eight parameters in both the post-RK and keratoconus groups were significantly different from those in the control group (P < .05, all). Although less corneal stiffness was observed in the post-RK and keratoconus groups than in the control group, radius-related parameters, the ratio between the deformation amplitude at the apex and at 2 mm, and the difference in corneal thickness from the center to the periphery differed between the post-RK and keratoconus groups.

Conclusions: Dynamic Scheimpflug imaging quantitatively demonstrated that the mechanism of decreased corneal biomechanical characteristics in post-RK eyes differs from that in eyes with keratoconus, which generally causes localized corneal thinning and protrusion around the corneal apex.

桡骨角膜切开术与圆锥角膜术后角膜生物力学变化的比较。
目的:比较桡骨角膜切开术(RK)与圆锥角膜的生物力学特征。方法:采用回顾性病例对照研究,对8例rk术后患者的15只眼、20例年龄匹配的圆锥角膜患者的20只眼和20例正常对照者的20只眼进行评估。采用动态Scheimpflug成像的空气脉冲装置,测量角膜在变形过程中的生物力学参数,包括时间、速度、变形幅度和变形幅度/长度/面积。同时记录综合生物力学筛选和扩张检测的参数。比较rk术后、圆锥角膜组和对照组的27个角膜生物力学参数。结果:rk术后21项指标与圆锥角膜组比较,18项指标与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在21个参数中,rk后组有17个参数(包括挠度振幅/长度/面积)显著高于圆锥角膜组和对照组(P < 0.05)。rk术后组和圆锥角膜组8项指标与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。虽然rk后组和圆锥角膜组的角膜僵硬度低于对照组,但rk后组和圆锥角膜组的半径相关参数、顶点变形幅度与2mm变形幅度之比以及从中心到周围的角膜厚度差异存在差异。结论:动态Scheimpflug成像定量显示rk后角膜生物力学特征下降的机制与圆锥角膜不同,通常会导致角膜局部变薄和角膜尖周围突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信