Sebastian Johannes Bauer, Moritz Benjamin Immohr, Friederike Irmgard Schoettler, Yukiharu Sugimura, Arash Mehdiani, Matthias Thielmann, Ajay Moza, Anna Fischbach, Michael Knapen, Evangelos Karasimos, Georg Eberhardt, Gereon Schaelte, Rolf Rossaint, Gernot Marx, Payam Akhyari
{"title":"Fast-track extubation in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: limits and lessons of a 4-year single-center analysis.","authors":"Sebastian Johannes Bauer, Moritz Benjamin Immohr, Friederike Irmgard Schoettler, Yukiharu Sugimura, Arash Mehdiani, Matthias Thielmann, Ajay Moza, Anna Fischbach, Michael Knapen, Evangelos Karasimos, Georg Eberhardt, Gereon Schaelte, Rolf Rossaint, Gernot Marx, Payam Akhyari","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1567533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fast-track extubation is a key component of the interdisciplinary treatment concept Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). In preparation for implementing ERAS as a comprehensive approach, we aimed to analyze the current state of fast-track extubation in the operating room, focusing on Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS). Specifically, we assessed the potential benefits of immediate on-table extubation compared to extubation within six hours after the completion of MICS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During a 4-year period from 2019-2023, a total of <i>n</i> = 146 patients underwent MICS at our institution. Surgical aspects were retrospectively analysed along with patients' risk profiles and relevant comorbidities. After 1:1 best neighbor propensity score matching, patients who were admitted to intensive care unit intubated but were extubated within six hours after surgery (fast-track, FT) were compared to those who were extubated in the operating room (extubation in tabula, EIT). The primary endpoint was fast-track failure (FTF), a composite of setbacks in the postoperative course: revision surgery, re-intubation, and readmission to ICU or intermediate care unit (IMC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients had a median age of 61 years (IQR: 51.3-67.8) and were predominantly male (76.7%). The primary study endpoint occurred in 20.0% of all matched patients (FT: 26.7%, EIT: 13.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.289). FT patients had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times [FT 165.0 min (146.5-217.5); EIT 158.5 min (128.0-189.5); <i>p</i> = 0.047], but the duration of surgery was comparable. Additionally, the average length of hospital stay did not differ. A multivariate analysis was conducted and identified preoperative atrial fibrillation and intraoperative hypothermia as predictive risk factors for FTF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our retrospective single-center analysis, extubation in the operating room is feasible and safe even outside of a structured ERAS program. However, as itself it does not impact the further hospital stay, if there is no action thereafter, e.g., same day physiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1567533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1567533","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fast-track extubation is a key component of the interdisciplinary treatment concept Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). In preparation for implementing ERAS as a comprehensive approach, we aimed to analyze the current state of fast-track extubation in the operating room, focusing on Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS). Specifically, we assessed the potential benefits of immediate on-table extubation compared to extubation within six hours after the completion of MICS.
Methods: During a 4-year period from 2019-2023, a total of n = 146 patients underwent MICS at our institution. Surgical aspects were retrospectively analysed along with patients' risk profiles and relevant comorbidities. After 1:1 best neighbor propensity score matching, patients who were admitted to intensive care unit intubated but were extubated within six hours after surgery (fast-track, FT) were compared to those who were extubated in the operating room (extubation in tabula, EIT). The primary endpoint was fast-track failure (FTF), a composite of setbacks in the postoperative course: revision surgery, re-intubation, and readmission to ICU or intermediate care unit (IMC).
Results: Patients had a median age of 61 years (IQR: 51.3-67.8) and were predominantly male (76.7%). The primary study endpoint occurred in 20.0% of all matched patients (FT: 26.7%, EIT: 13.3%; p = 0.289). FT patients had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times [FT 165.0 min (146.5-217.5); EIT 158.5 min (128.0-189.5); p = 0.047], but the duration of surgery was comparable. Additionally, the average length of hospital stay did not differ. A multivariate analysis was conducted and identified preoperative atrial fibrillation and intraoperative hypothermia as predictive risk factors for FTF.
Conclusions: According to our retrospective single-center analysis, extubation in the operating room is feasible and safe even outside of a structured ERAS program. However, as itself it does not impact the further hospital stay, if there is no action thereafter, e.g., same day physiotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers?
At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.