{"title":"Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Enhances Postoperative Microcirculation and Reduces Acute Kidney Injury in Cardiac Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial.","authors":"Po-Yuan Shih, Tsung-Ta Wu, Kuang-Cheng Chan, Ron-Bin Hsu, Ching-Tao Chang, Wei-Han Chou, Chun-Yu Wu","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S541433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, has shown potential benefits in various surgical settings, but its impact on microcirculation and renal function in cardiac surgery patients remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at a single university hospital. Seventy patients undergoing non-emergency cardiac and aortic surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled, and 68 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg loading dose, followed by 0.5 mcg/kg/h) or saline. The infusion of dexmedetomidine or saline began at anesthesia induction and continued until the end of surgery. Key microcirculatory variables-total vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels, perfused vessel density, De Backer's score, microvascular flow index, and heterogeneity index-were measured at five time points: baseline, 1 hour after cardiopulmonary bypass, 1 hour after arrival in the intensive care unit, 24 hours after surgery, and 48 hours after surgery. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effects model with Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference correction. Intraoperative urine output, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury, and other postoperative complications were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the dexmedetomidine group maintained higher postoperative proportion of perfused vessels and perfused vessel density compared to the saline group, with a significant interaction effect for perfused vessel density. Baseline perfused vessel density was comparable between the two study groups (17.5 [15.9-18.6] vs 18.0 [16.1-19.8] mm/mm², p = 0.540). At 48 hours postoperatively, patients in the dexmedetomidine group had significantly higher PVD values than those in the saline group (17.0 [15.0-19.0] vs 15.6 [13.7-16.9] mm/mm²; P = 0.041). The dexmedetomidine group also had significantly higher intraoperative urine output (950 vs 605 mL, p = 0.002). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (11.8% vs 50%, p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion during cardiac surgery is associated with higher postoperative microcirculatory state and a reduced incidence of acute kidney injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"8451-8462"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S541433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, has shown potential benefits in various surgical settings, but its impact on microcirculation and renal function in cardiac surgery patients remains unclear.
Patients and methods: This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at a single university hospital. Seventy patients undergoing non-emergency cardiac and aortic surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled, and 68 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg loading dose, followed by 0.5 mcg/kg/h) or saline. The infusion of dexmedetomidine or saline began at anesthesia induction and continued until the end of surgery. Key microcirculatory variables-total vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels, perfused vessel density, De Backer's score, microvascular flow index, and heterogeneity index-were measured at five time points: baseline, 1 hour after cardiopulmonary bypass, 1 hour after arrival in the intensive care unit, 24 hours after surgery, and 48 hours after surgery. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effects model with Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference correction. Intraoperative urine output, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury, and other postoperative complications were also compared.
Results: Patients in the dexmedetomidine group maintained higher postoperative proportion of perfused vessels and perfused vessel density compared to the saline group, with a significant interaction effect for perfused vessel density. Baseline perfused vessel density was comparable between the two study groups (17.5 [15.9-18.6] vs 18.0 [16.1-19.8] mm/mm², p = 0.540). At 48 hours postoperatively, patients in the dexmedetomidine group had significantly higher PVD values than those in the saline group (17.0 [15.0-19.0] vs 15.6 [13.7-16.9] mm/mm²; P = 0.041). The dexmedetomidine group also had significantly higher intraoperative urine output (950 vs 605 mL, p = 0.002). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (11.8% vs 50%, p = 0.001).
Conclusion: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion during cardiac surgery is associated with higher postoperative microcirculatory state and a reduced incidence of acute kidney injury.
期刊介绍:
Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications.
The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas.
Specific topics covered by the journal include:
Drug target identification and validation
Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution
Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways
New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery*
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes)
Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes
Fragment-based drug discovery
Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology
Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products**
Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development
Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing)
Preclinical development studies
Translational animal models
Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways
Toxicology
Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy
Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics
Clinical drug evaluation
Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.