Clinical trials that could change the management of severe multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI:10.1097/QCO.0000000000001150
Matteo Bassetti, Antonio Vena, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
{"title":"Clinical trials that could change the management of severe multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections.","authors":"Matteo Bassetti, Antonio Vena, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe","doi":"10.1097/QCO.0000000000001150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This article reviews recent and ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating novel antibiotics and treatment strategies for severe Gram-negative infections, particularly those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. It discusses how these trials are reshaping clinical practice and outlines current limitations in their applicability to real-world scenarios.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several novel β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have shown efficacy in RCTs targeting infections like complicated urinary tract infections, intra-abdominal infections, and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Additional considerations on the results of recent RCTs challenge the necessity of combination regimens, and a growing body of evidence from other RCTs support shorter treatment durations for selected Gram-negative infections, overall potentially reinforcing antimicrobial stewardship. However, limitations include small sample sizes in pathogen-specific subgroups, frequent exclusion of critically ill or immunocompromised patients, and a focus on sites and types of infections within narrow regulatory definitions.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Current RCTs have enriched clinical management of severe Gram-negative infections by validating new agents and supporting more personalized, safer, and shorter treatments. Nevertheless, gaps persist regarding their generalizability to high-risk populations and real-world infections. Complementary pathogen-focused trials, adaptive designs, and observational studies are needed to expand the evidence base, also for treatment duration in MDR infections, combination regimens, and resistance development. Integrating trial data with clinical judgment remains essential in bridging the gap between trial conditions and bedside care in line with the principles of precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10880,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"616-623"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000001150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This article reviews recent and ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating novel antibiotics and treatment strategies for severe Gram-negative infections, particularly those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. It discusses how these trials are reshaping clinical practice and outlines current limitations in their applicability to real-world scenarios.

Recent findings: Several novel β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have shown efficacy in RCTs targeting infections like complicated urinary tract infections, intra-abdominal infections, and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Additional considerations on the results of recent RCTs challenge the necessity of combination regimens, and a growing body of evidence from other RCTs support shorter treatment durations for selected Gram-negative infections, overall potentially reinforcing antimicrobial stewardship. However, limitations include small sample sizes in pathogen-specific subgroups, frequent exclusion of critically ill or immunocompromised patients, and a focus on sites and types of infections within narrow regulatory definitions.

Summary: Current RCTs have enriched clinical management of severe Gram-negative infections by validating new agents and supporting more personalized, safer, and shorter treatments. Nevertheless, gaps persist regarding their generalizability to high-risk populations and real-world infections. Complementary pathogen-focused trials, adaptive designs, and observational studies are needed to expand the evidence base, also for treatment duration in MDR infections, combination regimens, and resistance development. Integrating trial data with clinical judgment remains essential in bridging the gap between trial conditions and bedside care in line with the principles of precision medicine.

可能改变严重耐多药革兰氏阴性感染管理的临床试验。
综述目的:本文综述了近期和正在进行的随机对照试验(rct),这些试验研究了严重革兰氏阴性感染的新型抗生素和治疗策略,特别是那些由多重耐药(MDR)细菌引起的感染。它讨论了这些试验是如何重塑临床实践的,并概述了目前它们在现实世界场景中的适用性的局限性。最近的发现:几种新型β-内酰胺和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合在随机对照试验中显示出针对复杂尿路感染、腹腔感染和医院获得性肺炎等感染的疗效。对近期随机对照试验结果的进一步考虑挑战了联合方案的必要性,并且来自其他随机对照试验的越来越多的证据支持缩短选定革兰氏阴性感染的治疗持续时间,总体上可能加强抗菌药物管理。然而,局限性包括病原体特异性亚组的样本量小,经常排除危重患者或免疫功能低下患者,以及在狭窄的监管定义中关注感染的部位和类型。摘要:目前的随机对照试验通过验证新药和支持更个性化、更安全、更短的治疗,丰富了严重革兰氏阴性感染的临床管理。然而,在对高危人群和现实世界感染的推广方面,差距仍然存在。需要补充性的以病原体为重点的试验、适应性设计和观察性研究来扩大证据基础,也需要对耐多药感染的治疗时间、联合方案和耐药性发展进行研究。将试验数据与临床判断相结合对于弥合试验条件与床边护理之间的差距仍然是至关重要的,符合精准医学的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This reader-friendly, bimonthly resource provides a powerful, broad-based perspective on the most important advances from throughout the world literature. Featuring renowned guest editors and focusing exclusively on two topics, every issue of Current Opinion in Infectious Disease delivers unvarnished, expert assessments of developments from the previous year. Insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews cover key subjects such as HIV infection and AIDS; skin and soft tissue infections; respiratory infections; paediatric and neonatal infections; gastrointestinal infections; tropical and travel-associated diseases; and antimicrobial agents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书