Video-based physiotherapy assessment of knee osteoarthritis in patients with knee pain: a validity and reliability pilot study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Christin Heina, Susanne Beischer, Chan-Mei Ho-Henriksson, Elvira Lange
{"title":"Video-based physiotherapy assessment of knee osteoarthritis in patients with knee pain: a validity and reliability pilot study.","authors":"Christin Heina, Susanne Beischer, Chan-Mei Ho-Henriksson, Elvira Lange","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-09201-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health technologies are advancing rapidly, with an increasing number of physiotherapists favoring real-time, video-based platforms over telephone-based modalities. Osteoarthritis affects an estimated 595 million individuals worldwide, with approximately 62% of cases involving the knee joint. However, evidence regarding the validity and reliability of video-based assessments for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) remains scarce. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility of video-based physiotherapy assessment of KOA in patients with knee pain. Additionally, we aimed to provide preliminary data on its concurrent validity and interrater reliability compared with conventional face-to-face assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional validity and reliability pilot study was conducted in June 2024. Participants were recruited through public advertisements. Eligible individuals were aged 45 years or older and reported knee pain. Each participant underwent both a real-time video-based physiotherapy assessment and a conventional, face-to-face assessment. The video-based assessments were recorded for later analysis. Concurrent validity was examined by determining the exact or potential agreement between the video-based and face-to-face assessments. Interrater reliability was evaluated by comparing the live video-based assessments with those obtained from the recorded video-based assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For concurrent validity, exact agreement was observed in 28 of 35 cases (80%; κ = 0.35), indicating fair agreement. Potential agreement was achieved in 33 of 35 cases (94%; κ = 0.64), indicating substantial agreement. Interrater reliability demonstrated exact agreement in 25 of 29 cases (86%; κ = 0.52), corresponding to moderate agreement. Potential agreement for interrater reliability was observed in 27 of 29 cases (93%; κ = 0.63), corresponding to substantial agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Video-based physiotherapy assessment appears feasible and may provide preliminary indications of validity for diagnosing KOA in individuals with nontraumatic knee pain. The results suggest acceptable interrater agreement and highlight the need for more standardized digital assessment protocols to ensure consistent and reliable use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN41057250), 09/05/2025. Retrospectively registered. Prospectively registered in FoU in VGR (researchweb.org) 282608, Date of registration 26/03/2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"853"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09201-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital health technologies are advancing rapidly, with an increasing number of physiotherapists favoring real-time, video-based platforms over telephone-based modalities. Osteoarthritis affects an estimated 595 million individuals worldwide, with approximately 62% of cases involving the knee joint. However, evidence regarding the validity and reliability of video-based assessments for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) remains scarce. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility of video-based physiotherapy assessment of KOA in patients with knee pain. Additionally, we aimed to provide preliminary data on its concurrent validity and interrater reliability compared with conventional face-to-face assessment.

Methods: A cross-sectional validity and reliability pilot study was conducted in June 2024. Participants were recruited through public advertisements. Eligible individuals were aged 45 years or older and reported knee pain. Each participant underwent both a real-time video-based physiotherapy assessment and a conventional, face-to-face assessment. The video-based assessments were recorded for later analysis. Concurrent validity was examined by determining the exact or potential agreement between the video-based and face-to-face assessments. Interrater reliability was evaluated by comparing the live video-based assessments with those obtained from the recorded video-based assessments.

Results: For concurrent validity, exact agreement was observed in 28 of 35 cases (80%; κ = 0.35), indicating fair agreement. Potential agreement was achieved in 33 of 35 cases (94%; κ = 0.64), indicating substantial agreement. Interrater reliability demonstrated exact agreement in 25 of 29 cases (86%; κ = 0.52), corresponding to moderate agreement. Potential agreement for interrater reliability was observed in 27 of 29 cases (93%; κ = 0.63), corresponding to substantial agreement.

Conclusions: Video-based physiotherapy assessment appears feasible and may provide preliminary indications of validity for diagnosing KOA in individuals with nontraumatic knee pain. The results suggest acceptable interrater agreement and highlight the need for more standardized digital assessment protocols to ensure consistent and reliable use in clinical practice.

Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN41057250), 09/05/2025. Retrospectively registered. Prospectively registered in FoU in VGR (researchweb.org) 282608, Date of registration 26/03/2024.

Abstract Image

基于视频的膝骨关节炎膝痛患者物理治疗评估:有效性和可靠性的初步研究。
背景:数字健康技术正在迅速发展,越来越多的物理治疗师倾向于实时、基于视频的平台,而不是基于电话的模式。全球约有5.95亿人患有骨关节炎,其中约62%的病例涉及膝关节。然而,关于基于视频评估膝骨关节炎(KOA)的有效性和可靠性的证据仍然很少。本初步研究的目的是探讨基于视频的物理治疗评估膝关节疼痛患者KOA的可行性。此外,我们的目的是提供初步的数据,比较其并发效度和互信度与传统的面对面评估。方法:于2024年6月进行横断面效度和信度初步研究。参与者是通过公共广告招募的。符合条件的受试者年龄在45岁或以上,并报告有膝关节疼痛。每位参与者都接受了实时视频物理治疗评估和传统的面对面评估。以视频为基础的评估被记录下来供以后分析。通过确定基于视频和面对面评估之间的确切或潜在的一致性来检查并发效度。通过比较基于实时视频的评估与从录制的基于视频的评估中获得的评估来评估互估器的可靠性。结果:35例并发效度中有28例完全一致(80%;κ = 0.35),一致性较好。35例中有33例(94%;κ = 0.64)达到潜在一致,表明基本一致。29例中有25例(86%;κ = 0.52)的判读信度完全一致,对应于中度一致。29例中有27例(93%;κ = 0.63)观察到潜在的一致性,对应于实质性的一致性。结论:基于视频的物理治疗评估似乎是可行的,并可能为诊断非外伤性膝关节疼痛患者的KOA提供初步的有效性指征。结果表明了可接受的互解释器协议,并强调需要更标准化的数字评估协议,以确保临床实践中一致和可靠的使用。试验注册:ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN41057250), 2025年9月5日。回顾注册。前瞻性注册VGR (researchweb.org) 282608,注册日期26/03/2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信