Transvaginal Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy vs. abdominal laparoscopic approach in real-life practices: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ala Aiob, Yara Nakhleh Francis, Haya Hebi, Saaed Awwad, Susana Mustafa Mikhail, Avishalom Sharon, Inshirah Sgayer, Lior Lowenstein
{"title":"Transvaginal Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy vs. abdominal laparoscopic approach in real-life practices: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Ala Aiob, Yara Nakhleh Francis, Haya Hebi, Saaed Awwad, Susana Mustafa Mikhail, Avishalom Sharon, Inshirah Sgayer, Lior Lowenstein","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08195-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the surgical outcomes of total hysterectomy performed via Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy (LAP) in treating benign gynecologic conditions in a real-world clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Galilee Medical Center, Israel, between March 2021 and 2023. A total of 133 women were included in the study. The vNOTES group comprised 58 women, while 75 women underwent LAP. All women eligible for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign conditions were offered the vNOTES approach. Exclusion criteria included prior pelvic radiation, active genital infections, rectovaginal endometriosis, or the need for oncogynecologic surgery related to malignancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vNOTES group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (69.5 vs. 117.4 min, p < 0.001) and anesthesia durations (102 vs. 146.3 min, p < 0.001), as well as reduced blood loss (108.6 mL vs. 237.9 mL, p < 0.001) compared to the LAP group. Postoperative pain, assessed by VAS scores, was significantly lower in the vNOTES group than in the LAP group (2.33 vs. 3.11, p = 0.013), with fewer requests for intravenous analgesics. No significant differences were observed between the groups in complication rates, conversion to laparotomy, or postoperative hospital stays.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The vNOTES hysterectomy demonstrated shorter operative and anesthesia times, reduced blood loss, lower postoperative pain, and intravenous analgesic requirements compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy, without increasing complication rates. These findings suggest that vNOTES offers a viable, minimally invasive alternative to conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of benign gynecologic conditions. Further prospective studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes and the impact on quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08195-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the surgical outcomes of total hysterectomy performed via Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy (LAP) in treating benign gynecologic conditions in a real-world clinical setting.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Galilee Medical Center, Israel, between March 2021 and 2023. A total of 133 women were included in the study. The vNOTES group comprised 58 women, while 75 women underwent LAP. All women eligible for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign conditions were offered the vNOTES approach. Exclusion criteria included prior pelvic radiation, active genital infections, rectovaginal endometriosis, or the need for oncogynecologic surgery related to malignancy.

Results: The vNOTES group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (69.5 vs. 117.4 min, p < 0.001) and anesthesia durations (102 vs. 146.3 min, p < 0.001), as well as reduced blood loss (108.6 mL vs. 237.9 mL, p < 0.001) compared to the LAP group. Postoperative pain, assessed by VAS scores, was significantly lower in the vNOTES group than in the LAP group (2.33 vs. 3.11, p = 0.013), with fewer requests for intravenous analgesics. No significant differences were observed between the groups in complication rates, conversion to laparotomy, or postoperative hospital stays.

Conclusion: The vNOTES hysterectomy demonstrated shorter operative and anesthesia times, reduced blood loss, lower postoperative pain, and intravenous analgesic requirements compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy, without increasing complication rates. These findings suggest that vNOTES offers a viable, minimally invasive alternative to conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of benign gynecologic conditions. Further prospective studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes and the impact on quality of life.

经阴道自然孔腔内窥镜子宫切除术与腹部腹腔镜在现实生活中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:本研究旨在回顾性评价阴道自然口腔内窥镜手术(vNOTES)与腹腔镜子宫切除术(LAP)在治疗妇科良性疾病中的临床效果。方法:这项回顾性队列研究于2021年3月至2023年3月在以色列加利利医学中心进行。共有133名女性参与了这项研究。vNOTES组包括58名妇女,而75名妇女接受了LAP。所有符合良性条件的妇女均采用vNOTES方法进行腹腔镜子宫切除术。排除标准包括既往盆腔放疗,活动性生殖器感染,直肠阴道子宫内膜异位症,或需要恶性肿瘤相关的妇科手术。结果:vNOTES组的手术时间明显缩短(69.5分钟vs. 117.4分钟)。结论:与腹腔镜子宫切除术相比,vNOTES子宫切除术的手术和麻醉时间更短,出血量更少,术后疼痛更轻,静脉镇痛需求更低,并发症发生率不增加。这些发现表明,vNOTES提供了一种可行的,微创替代传统腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来评估长期结果和对生活质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信