Community Practices and Perceptions Regarding Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Mingjuan Zeng, Eleanor Clapham, Dean Picone, Sonali R Gnanenthiran, Ruth Griffiths, Niamh Chapman, Aletta E Schutte
{"title":"Community Practices and Perceptions Regarding Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques.","authors":"Mingjuan Zeng, Eleanor Clapham, Dean Picone, Sonali R Gnanenthiran, Ruth Griffiths, Niamh Chapman, Aletta E Schutte","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite various blood pressure (BP) measurement methods being available, many people report never or infrequently having their BP measured. There is a gap between clinical guidelines and the implementation of BP monitoring. To bridge that gap, we interviewed community members to understand their practices and perceptions regarding various measurement methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Australian adults who participated in a home BP measurement study were purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews (2023-2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 29) were middle-aged (mean 61 ± 12.8 years, 55% female), and most (79%) had diagnosed hypertension. All participants had real-world experience with both clinic and home BP measurements; 15 with 24-hour ambulatory monitoring (24h ABPM); 10 with kiosks; and three used cuffless BP devices. Participants described clinic BP as routine and highly valued direct feedback from doctors. Participants valued home BP due to convenience and the number of measurements they could take. Most participants reported no issues with 24h ABPM, although three experienced severe discomfort or dislike. Concerns about measurement accuracy and privacy were raised by four participants regarding kiosk BP, as devices were sometimes non-standardized and located in open areas. Most participants expressed interest in cuffless BP devices but had limited experience using them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have identified barriers associated with clinic, 24-hour ABPM, HBPM, and kiosk BP that need to be addressed to enhance consumer satisfaction and increase monitoring rates, highlighting the need for a coordinated approach involving key health organizations and healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf195","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite various blood pressure (BP) measurement methods being available, many people report never or infrequently having their BP measured. There is a gap between clinical guidelines and the implementation of BP monitoring. To bridge that gap, we interviewed community members to understand their practices and perceptions regarding various measurement methods.

Methods: Australian adults who participated in a home BP measurement study were purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews (2023-2024).

Results: Participants (n = 29) were middle-aged (mean 61 ± 12.8 years, 55% female), and most (79%) had diagnosed hypertension. All participants had real-world experience with both clinic and home BP measurements; 15 with 24-hour ambulatory monitoring (24h ABPM); 10 with kiosks; and three used cuffless BP devices. Participants described clinic BP as routine and highly valued direct feedback from doctors. Participants valued home BP due to convenience and the number of measurements they could take. Most participants reported no issues with 24h ABPM, although three experienced severe discomfort or dislike. Concerns about measurement accuracy and privacy were raised by four participants regarding kiosk BP, as devices were sometimes non-standardized and located in open areas. Most participants expressed interest in cuffless BP devices but had limited experience using them.

Conclusions: We have identified barriers associated with clinic, 24-hour ABPM, HBPM, and kiosk BP that need to be addressed to enhance consumer satisfaction and increase monitoring rates, highlighting the need for a coordinated approach involving key health organizations and healthcare professionals.

关于血压测量技术的社区实践和认知。
背景:尽管有各种各样的血压测量方法可用,但许多人报告从未或很少测量血压。临床指南与血压监测的实施之间存在差距。为了弥合这一差距,我们采访了社区成员,以了解他们对各种测量方法的实践和看法。方法:有目的地对参加家庭血压测量研究的澳大利亚成年人进行半结构化访谈(2023-2024)。结果:参与者(n = 29)为中年人(平均61±12.8岁,55%为女性),大多数(79%)诊断为高血压。所有参与者都有临床和家庭血压测量的实际经验;15例24小时动态监测(24h ABPM);10个设有售货亭;3台使用无套管BP装置。参与者将临床血压描述为常规的,并且高度重视医生的直接反馈。由于方便和可以测量的次数,参与者重视家庭BP。大多数参与者报告说24小时ABPM没有问题,尽管有三个人经历了严重的不适或厌恶。四名与会者就kiosk BP提出了对测量准确性和隐私的担忧,因为设备有时未标准化且位于开放区域。大多数参与者表示对无袖带BP设备感兴趣,但使用经验有限。结论:我们已经确定了与诊所、24小时ABPM、HBPM和kiosk BP相关的障碍,需要解决这些障碍,以提高消费者满意度和提高监测率,强调需要一个涉及关键卫生组织和卫生保健专业人员的协调方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信