Darwin L Moreno-Echeverry, Miko U F Kirschbaum, Margaret M Barbour, Lìyǐn L Liáng
{"title":"Estimating the Photorespiratory CO<sub>2</sub> Compensation Point and CO<sub>2</sub> Release in the Light Using the Laisk Method Combined With Photosynthetic Theory.","authors":"Darwin L Moreno-Echeverry, Miko U F Kirschbaum, Margaret M Barbour, Lìyǐn L Liáng","doi":"10.1111/pce.70195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The photorespiratory CO<sub>2</sub> compensation point (Γ*) and the rate of CO<sub>2</sub> release in the light (D<sub>L</sub>) are critical parameters for understanding the carbon dynamics of C<sub>3</sub> plants. These two parameters can be derived from the widely-used Laisk method as the intercept of linear regression lines fitted to net assimilation rates (A<sub>net</sub>) vs. chloroplast CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressures (C<sub>c</sub>) obtained at different low-irradiance levels. However, photosynthetic theory indicates curvature in the A<sub>net</sub>-C<sub>c</sub> relationship which conflicts with the use of linear relationships for analysis. We, therefore, systematically evaluated the limitations of the use of linear relationships across temperatures from 5°C to 40°C and quantified the sensitivity of errors in Γ* and D<sub>L</sub> estimates to the selected C<sub>c</sub> range. We found that wide CO<sub>2</sub> ranges, especially when they exclude the expected Γ*, can introduce substantial biases in parameter estimation with linear regressions, particularly at lower temperatures. This can lead to marked underestimates of Γ*, and biologically unrealistic D<sub>L</sub>. We propose refining the Laisk method by using a photosynthesis model to analyse data. The model better represents the nonlinear A<sub>net</sub>-C<sub>c</sub> relationship and yields consistent Γ* and D<sub>L</sub> estimates, regardless of the CO<sub>2</sub> range used.</p>","PeriodicalId":222,"journal":{"name":"Plant, Cell & Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant, Cell & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.70195","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The photorespiratory CO2 compensation point (Γ*) and the rate of CO2 release in the light (DL) are critical parameters for understanding the carbon dynamics of C3 plants. These two parameters can be derived from the widely-used Laisk method as the intercept of linear regression lines fitted to net assimilation rates (Anet) vs. chloroplast CO2 partial pressures (Cc) obtained at different low-irradiance levels. However, photosynthetic theory indicates curvature in the Anet-Cc relationship which conflicts with the use of linear relationships for analysis. We, therefore, systematically evaluated the limitations of the use of linear relationships across temperatures from 5°C to 40°C and quantified the sensitivity of errors in Γ* and DL estimates to the selected Cc range. We found that wide CO2 ranges, especially when they exclude the expected Γ*, can introduce substantial biases in parameter estimation with linear regressions, particularly at lower temperatures. This can lead to marked underestimates of Γ*, and biologically unrealistic DL. We propose refining the Laisk method by using a photosynthesis model to analyse data. The model better represents the nonlinear Anet-Cc relationship and yields consistent Γ* and DL estimates, regardless of the CO2 range used.
期刊介绍:
Plant, Cell & Environment is a premier plant science journal, offering valuable insights into plant responses to their environment. Committed to publishing high-quality theoretical and experimental research, the journal covers a broad spectrum of factors, spanning from molecular to community levels. Researchers exploring various aspects of plant biology, physiology, and ecology contribute to the journal's comprehensive understanding of plant-environment interactions.