Estimating the Photorespiratory CO2 Compensation Point and CO2 Release in the Light Using the Laisk Method Combined With Photosynthetic Theory.

IF 6.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Darwin L Moreno-Echeverry, Miko U F Kirschbaum, Margaret M Barbour, Lìyǐn L Liáng
{"title":"Estimating the Photorespiratory CO<sub>2</sub> Compensation Point and CO<sub>2</sub> Release in the Light Using the Laisk Method Combined With Photosynthetic Theory.","authors":"Darwin L Moreno-Echeverry, Miko U F Kirschbaum, Margaret M Barbour, Lìyǐn L Liáng","doi":"10.1111/pce.70195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The photorespiratory CO<sub>2</sub> compensation point (Γ*) and the rate of CO<sub>2</sub> release in the light (D<sub>L</sub>) are critical parameters for understanding the carbon dynamics of C<sub>3</sub> plants. These two parameters can be derived from the widely-used Laisk method as the intercept of linear regression lines fitted to net assimilation rates (A<sub>net</sub>) vs. chloroplast CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressures (C<sub>c</sub>) obtained at different low-irradiance levels. However, photosynthetic theory indicates curvature in the A<sub>net</sub>-C<sub>c</sub> relationship which conflicts with the use of linear relationships for analysis. We, therefore, systematically evaluated the limitations of the use of linear relationships across temperatures from 5°C to 40°C and quantified the sensitivity of errors in Γ* and D<sub>L</sub> estimates to the selected C<sub>c</sub> range. We found that wide CO<sub>2</sub> ranges, especially when they exclude the expected Γ*, can introduce substantial biases in parameter estimation with linear regressions, particularly at lower temperatures. This can lead to marked underestimates of Γ*, and biologically unrealistic D<sub>L</sub>. We propose refining the Laisk method by using a photosynthesis model to analyse data. The model better represents the nonlinear A<sub>net</sub>-C<sub>c</sub> relationship and yields consistent Γ* and D<sub>L</sub> estimates, regardless of the CO<sub>2</sub> range used.</p>","PeriodicalId":222,"journal":{"name":"Plant, Cell & Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant, Cell & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.70195","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The photorespiratory CO2 compensation point (Γ*) and the rate of CO2 release in the light (DL) are critical parameters for understanding the carbon dynamics of C3 plants. These two parameters can be derived from the widely-used Laisk method as the intercept of linear regression lines fitted to net assimilation rates (Anet) vs. chloroplast CO2 partial pressures (Cc) obtained at different low-irradiance levels. However, photosynthetic theory indicates curvature in the Anet-Cc relationship which conflicts with the use of linear relationships for analysis. We, therefore, systematically evaluated the limitations of the use of linear relationships across temperatures from 5°C to 40°C and quantified the sensitivity of errors in Γ* and DL estimates to the selected Cc range. We found that wide CO2 ranges, especially when they exclude the expected Γ*, can introduce substantial biases in parameter estimation with linear regressions, particularly at lower temperatures. This can lead to marked underestimates of Γ*, and biologically unrealistic DL. We propose refining the Laisk method by using a photosynthesis model to analyse data. The model better represents the nonlinear Anet-Cc relationship and yields consistent Γ* and DL estimates, regardless of the CO2 range used.

利用Laisk法结合光合理论估算光呼吸CO2补偿点和光释放CO2。
光呼吸CO2补偿点(Γ*)和CO2光释放速率(DL)是了解C3植物碳动态的关键参数。这两个参数可以从广泛使用的Laisk方法中得到,作为在不同低辐照水平下获得的净同化率(Anet)与叶绿体CO2分压(Cc)拟合的线性回归线的截距。然而,光合作用理论指出了Anet-Cc关系中的曲率,这与使用线性关系进行分析相冲突。因此,我们系统地评估了在5°C至40°C温度范围内使用线性关系的局限性,并量化了Γ*和DL估计误差对所选Cc范围的敏感性。我们发现,较宽的CO2范围,特别是当它们排除预期的Γ*时,可以在线性回归的参数估计中引入实质性偏差,特别是在较低温度下。这可能导致对Γ*的明显低估,以及生物学上不现实的DL。我们建议通过使用光合作用模型来分析数据来改进Laisk方法。该模型更好地代表了非线性的Anet-Cc关系,并产生了一致的Γ*和DL估计,无论使用的二氧化碳范围如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant, Cell & Environment
Plant, Cell & Environment 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
253
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Plant, Cell & Environment is a premier plant science journal, offering valuable insights into plant responses to their environment. Committed to publishing high-quality theoretical and experimental research, the journal covers a broad spectrum of factors, spanning from molecular to community levels. Researchers exploring various aspects of plant biology, physiology, and ecology contribute to the journal's comprehensive understanding of plant-environment interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信