Generative AI for learning languages other than English: L2 writers' current uses and perceptions of ethics

IF 1.5 1区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Matt Kessler, Juan M. Rostrán Valle, Kübra Çekmegeli, Sean Farrell
{"title":"Generative AI for learning languages other than English: L2 writers' current uses and perceptions of ethics","authors":"Matt Kessler,&nbsp;Juan M. Rostrán Valle,&nbsp;Kübra Çekmegeli,&nbsp;Sean Farrell","doi":"10.1111/flan.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots has created opportunities and challenges for higher education. Extant scholarship has explored GenAI's capabilities and topics involving teachers' and students' perceptions of these tools. However, there is limited research exploring (1) whether second language (L2) learners actively leverage GenAI tools on their own for writing purposes in languages other than English (LOTEs), and (2) whether learners believe GenAI tools are ethical for L2 writing in educational settings. This study explores these gaps by adopting a sequential mixed methods design. First, a survey examined L2 learners (<i>N</i> = 287) of five LOTEs, exploring students' uses of GenAI tools for L2 writing and their beliefs about its ethicality. Second, a case study was conducted with three learners, in which interviews and video screen capture were leveraged to further understand issues of usage and ethics. The findings suggest that although many students have used GenAI tools, only 14.6% actively reported using them for L2 writing purposes. Still, such writers reported using GenAI in 12 distinct ways. Finally, 82.2% of students believed GenAI tools are ethical for different purposes. These findings are discussed with an eye toward future writing research and pedagogy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47560,"journal":{"name":"Foreign Language Annals","volume":"58 3","pages":"508-531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foreign Language Annals","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/flan.70005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots has created opportunities and challenges for higher education. Extant scholarship has explored GenAI's capabilities and topics involving teachers' and students' perceptions of these tools. However, there is limited research exploring (1) whether second language (L2) learners actively leverage GenAI tools on their own for writing purposes in languages other than English (LOTEs), and (2) whether learners believe GenAI tools are ethical for L2 writing in educational settings. This study explores these gaps by adopting a sequential mixed methods design. First, a survey examined L2 learners (N = 287) of five LOTEs, exploring students' uses of GenAI tools for L2 writing and their beliefs about its ethicality. Second, a case study was conducted with three learners, in which interviews and video screen capture were leveraged to further understand issues of usage and ethics. The findings suggest that although many students have used GenAI tools, only 14.6% actively reported using them for L2 writing purposes. Still, such writers reported using GenAI in 12 distinct ways. Finally, 82.2% of students believed GenAI tools are ethical for different purposes. These findings are discussed with an eye toward future writing research and pedagogy.

Abstract Image

用于学习英语以外语言的生成式人工智能:第二语言作者当前的使用和道德观念
生成式人工智能(GenAI)聊天机器人的出现为高等教育创造了机遇和挑战。现有的学术研究已经探索了GenAI的能力和主题,涉及教师和学生对这些工具的看法。然而,关于(1)第二语言(L2)学习者是否主动利用GenAI工具以英语以外的语言(LOTEs)进行写作目的的研究有限,以及(2)学习者是否认为GenAI工具在教育环境中用于第二语言写作是合乎道德的。本研究通过采用顺序混合方法设计来探索这些差距。首先,一项调查调查了五个lote的二语学习者(N = 287),探讨了学生在二语写作中使用GenAI工具的情况,以及他们对其伦理性的看法。其次,对三名学习者进行了案例研究,其中利用访谈和视频屏幕捕捉来进一步了解使用和道德问题。研究结果表明,尽管许多学生使用过GenAI工具,但只有14.6%的学生主动报告将其用于第二语言写作目的。尽管如此,这些作者还是以12种不同的方式使用了GenAI。最后,82.2%的学生认为基因人工智能工具出于不同目的是合乎道德的。这些发现将着眼于未来的写作研究和教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Dedicated to the advancement of language teaching and learning, Foreign Language Annals (FLA) seeks to serve the professional interests of classroom instructors, researchers, and administrators concerned with the learning and teaching of languages at all levels of instruction. The journal welcomes submissions of the highest quality that report empirical or theoretical research on language learning or teaching, that describe innovative and successful practice and methods, and/or that are relevant to the concerns and issues of the profession. FLA focuses primarily on language education for languages other than English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信