Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Respiratory Allergy: Monocentric Reevaluation of the GA2LEN Panel in Germany

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Caroline Beutner, Christian Meyer, Moritz Maximilian Hollstein, Katharina Klara Hahn, Michael Peter Schön, Timo Buhl
{"title":"Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Respiratory Allergy: Monocentric Reevaluation of the GA2LEN Panel in Germany","authors":"Caroline Beutner,&nbsp;Christian Meyer,&nbsp;Moritz Maximilian Hollstein,&nbsp;Katharina Klara Hahn,&nbsp;Michael Peter Schön,&nbsp;Timo Buhl","doi":"10.1002/clt2.70102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>European guidelines recommend using a standardized baseline series of skin prick test (SPT) allergens for the diagnosis of airway allergies. In addition, local adaptation and/or extension of test panels according to regional exposure and sensitization patterns are increasingly being discussed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Regional sensitization rates according to SPTs based on the most recent GA<sup>2</sup>LEN baseline series in Central Germany were retrospectively analyzed for 960 consecutive patients with respiratory symptoms at our university outpatient clinic. Additional SPT allergens of interest were further analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>High sensitization rates to the baseline SPT series were observed in our highly selected study cohort. The positivity rates were particularly high for olive pollen (30.8%) and plantain pollen (33.4%). Positive olive and birch pollen SPTs were found in 98.5% of olive-ash-birch pollen tested patients. High SPT positivity rates (98.1%) for plane tree and olive tree pollen were found, whereas only six patients (1.9%) were diagnosed with exclusive cypress pollen sensitization. Subgroup analysis of SPTs for palm tree pollen revealed that 92% of patients with palm tree positivity showed polysensitization, and all but one patient had concomitant grass pollen sensitization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Regular evaluations of SPT series may be necessary because of climate change, extract production, and increasing population mobility. Ash and cypress pollen extracts could currently be removed from the baseline SPT panel without significantly decreasing diagnostic accuracy. Positive SPTs to non-native palm tree pollen may indicate the presence of IgE to cross-reacting panallergens, which may help to differentiate primary sensitization from cross-reactivity directly. Limitations include the retrospective monocentric design and lack of molecular IgE confirmation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10334,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clt2.70102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.70102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

European guidelines recommend using a standardized baseline series of skin prick test (SPT) allergens for the diagnosis of airway allergies. In addition, local adaptation and/or extension of test panels according to regional exposure and sensitization patterns are increasingly being discussed.

Methods

Regional sensitization rates according to SPTs based on the most recent GA2LEN baseline series in Central Germany were retrospectively analyzed for 960 consecutive patients with respiratory symptoms at our university outpatient clinic. Additional SPT allergens of interest were further analyzed.

Results

High sensitization rates to the baseline SPT series were observed in our highly selected study cohort. The positivity rates were particularly high for olive pollen (30.8%) and plantain pollen (33.4%). Positive olive and birch pollen SPTs were found in 98.5% of olive-ash-birch pollen tested patients. High SPT positivity rates (98.1%) for plane tree and olive tree pollen were found, whereas only six patients (1.9%) were diagnosed with exclusive cypress pollen sensitization. Subgroup analysis of SPTs for palm tree pollen revealed that 92% of patients with palm tree positivity showed polysensitization, and all but one patient had concomitant grass pollen sensitization.

Conclusion

Regular evaluations of SPT series may be necessary because of climate change, extract production, and increasing population mobility. Ash and cypress pollen extracts could currently be removed from the baseline SPT panel without significantly decreasing diagnostic accuracy. Positive SPTs to non-native palm tree pollen may indicate the presence of IgE to cross-reacting panallergens, which may help to differentiate primary sensitization from cross-reactivity directly. Limitations include the retrospective monocentric design and lack of molecular IgE confirmation.

Abstract Image

提高呼吸道过敏的诊断准确性:德国GA2LEN小组的单中心重新评估
背景:欧洲指南推荐使用标准化基线系列皮肤点刺试验(SPT)过敏原来诊断气道过敏。此外,正在越来越多地讨论根据区域暴露和敏化模式进行局部调整和/或扩展试验小组。方法回顾性分析德国中部地区以最新GA2LEN基线系列为基础的spt区域致敏率,对我院门诊960例连续出现呼吸道症状的患者进行分析。进一步分析其他感兴趣的SPT过敏原。结果在我们精心挑选的研究队列中观察到对基线SPT系列的高敏化率。橄榄花粉(30.8%)和车前草花粉(33.4%)的阳性率最高。98.5%的橄榄灰桦树花粉检测患者发现橄榄和桦树花粉SPTs阳性。梧桐树和橄榄树花粉的SPT阳性率高达98.1%,而柏树花粉仅为6例(1.9%)。棕榈树花粉的SPTs亚组分析显示,92%的棕榈树阳性患者表现为多敏化,除1例患者外,其余患者均伴有草花粉敏化。结论由于气候变化、提取物生产和人口流动的增加,定期评估SPT系列可能是必要的。目前可以从基线SPT面板中去除白蜡树和柏树花粉提取物,而不会显著降低诊断准确性。对非本地棕榈树花粉的阳性SPTs可能表明存在对交叉反应的泛过敏原的IgE,这可能有助于直接区分原发性致敏性和交叉反应性。局限性包括回顾性单中心设计和缺乏分子IgE确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Allergy
Clinical and Translational Allergy Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Allergy, one of several journals in the portfolio of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy research and reviews, as well as EAACI position papers, task force reports and guidelines, amongst an international scientific audience. Clinical and Translational Allergy accepts clinical and translational research in the following areas and other related topics: asthma, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic skin diseases, atopic eczema, urticaria, angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis, food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, animal models of allergic disease, immune mechanisms, or any other topic related to allergic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信