Hongwei Xie , Qinghua Li , Chaokun Hong , Zhibin Zhuang , Shilang Xu
{"title":"Flexural performance of RC slabs strengthened by UHTCC/CFRP hybrid materials considering PE debonding effects","authors":"Hongwei Xie , Qinghua Li , Chaokun Hong , Zhibin Zhuang , Shilang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flexural behavior of six reinforced concrete (RC) slabs was investigated. The slabs were strengthened by different lengths of externally bonded (EB) CFRP sheets using sprayed ultra-high toughness cementitious composite (UHTCC) as bonding layers to induce plate end (PE) debonding. The structural performances including failure mode, load-deflection/strain response, toughness, and interfacial stress were analyzed. A three-parameter elastic foundation model was proposed to quantify interfacial stresses and predict structural flexural behaviors. The results reveal that debonding substantially degrades load-bearing capacity (38.20–66.99 %), ultimate deflection (57.77–88.08 %), and toughness (73.50–96.24 %), and severely limits CFRP utilization ratio to only 12.35–40.29 %. For equal-length UHTCC/CFRP layers, Interface I (concrete-UHTCC) reaches maximum stress at the end, while Interface II (UHTCC-FRP) exhibits peak stress at locations between midspan and ends, with both interfacial stresses decreasing as strengthening length increases. When UHTCC length is larger than CFRP, both interfaces reach their peak stresses at the end. However, Interface I end stress becomes CFRP-length-independent, while Interface II peak stress reduces by 94.13 % as CFRP length increases from 100 mm to 400 mm. The theoretical model accurately predicts the debonding locations and provides reasonable estimations of initial stiffness and ultimate deflection. However, the elastic framework results in overestimated load-carrying capacity predictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 121369"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625017602","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flexural behavior of six reinforced concrete (RC) slabs was investigated. The slabs were strengthened by different lengths of externally bonded (EB) CFRP sheets using sprayed ultra-high toughness cementitious composite (UHTCC) as bonding layers to induce plate end (PE) debonding. The structural performances including failure mode, load-deflection/strain response, toughness, and interfacial stress were analyzed. A three-parameter elastic foundation model was proposed to quantify interfacial stresses and predict structural flexural behaviors. The results reveal that debonding substantially degrades load-bearing capacity (38.20–66.99 %), ultimate deflection (57.77–88.08 %), and toughness (73.50–96.24 %), and severely limits CFRP utilization ratio to only 12.35–40.29 %. For equal-length UHTCC/CFRP layers, Interface I (concrete-UHTCC) reaches maximum stress at the end, while Interface II (UHTCC-FRP) exhibits peak stress at locations between midspan and ends, with both interfacial stresses decreasing as strengthening length increases. When UHTCC length is larger than CFRP, both interfaces reach their peak stresses at the end. However, Interface I end stress becomes CFRP-length-independent, while Interface II peak stress reduces by 94.13 % as CFRP length increases from 100 mm to 400 mm. The theoretical model accurately predicts the debonding locations and provides reasonable estimations of initial stiffness and ultimate deflection. However, the elastic framework results in overestimated load-carrying capacity predictions.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.