Flexural performance of RC slabs strengthened by UHTCC/CFRP hybrid materials considering PE debonding effects

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Hongwei Xie , Qinghua Li , Chaokun Hong , Zhibin Zhuang , Shilang Xu
{"title":"Flexural performance of RC slabs strengthened by UHTCC/CFRP hybrid materials considering PE debonding effects","authors":"Hongwei Xie ,&nbsp;Qinghua Li ,&nbsp;Chaokun Hong ,&nbsp;Zhibin Zhuang ,&nbsp;Shilang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flexural behavior of six reinforced concrete (RC) slabs was investigated. The slabs were strengthened by different lengths of externally bonded (EB) CFRP sheets using sprayed ultra-high toughness cementitious composite (UHTCC) as bonding layers to induce plate end (PE) debonding. The structural performances including failure mode, load-deflection/strain response, toughness, and interfacial stress were analyzed. A three-parameter elastic foundation model was proposed to quantify interfacial stresses and predict structural flexural behaviors. The results reveal that debonding substantially degrades load-bearing capacity (38.20–66.99 %), ultimate deflection (57.77–88.08 %), and toughness (73.50–96.24 %), and severely limits CFRP utilization ratio to only 12.35–40.29 %. For equal-length UHTCC/CFRP layers, Interface I (concrete-UHTCC) reaches maximum stress at the end, while Interface II (UHTCC-FRP) exhibits peak stress at locations between midspan and ends, with both interfacial stresses decreasing as strengthening length increases. When UHTCC length is larger than CFRP, both interfaces reach their peak stresses at the end. However, Interface I end stress becomes CFRP-length-independent, while Interface II peak stress reduces by 94.13 % as CFRP length increases from 100 mm to 400 mm. The theoretical model accurately predicts the debonding locations and provides reasonable estimations of initial stiffness and ultimate deflection. However, the elastic framework results in overestimated load-carrying capacity predictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 121369"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625017602","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flexural behavior of six reinforced concrete (RC) slabs was investigated. The slabs were strengthened by different lengths of externally bonded (EB) CFRP sheets using sprayed ultra-high toughness cementitious composite (UHTCC) as bonding layers to induce plate end (PE) debonding. The structural performances including failure mode, load-deflection/strain response, toughness, and interfacial stress were analyzed. A three-parameter elastic foundation model was proposed to quantify interfacial stresses and predict structural flexural behaviors. The results reveal that debonding substantially degrades load-bearing capacity (38.20–66.99 %), ultimate deflection (57.77–88.08 %), and toughness (73.50–96.24 %), and severely limits CFRP utilization ratio to only 12.35–40.29 %. For equal-length UHTCC/CFRP layers, Interface I (concrete-UHTCC) reaches maximum stress at the end, while Interface II (UHTCC-FRP) exhibits peak stress at locations between midspan and ends, with both interfacial stresses decreasing as strengthening length increases. When UHTCC length is larger than CFRP, both interfaces reach their peak stresses at the end. However, Interface I end stress becomes CFRP-length-independent, while Interface II peak stress reduces by 94.13 % as CFRP length increases from 100 mm to 400 mm. The theoretical model accurately predicts the debonding locations and provides reasonable estimations of initial stiffness and ultimate deflection. However, the elastic framework results in overestimated load-carrying capacity predictions.
考虑PE脱粘效应的UHTCC/CFRP复合材料加固RC板抗弯性能
对6块钢筋混凝土板的抗弯性能进行了研究。采用喷射超高韧性胶凝复合材料(UHTCC)作为粘结层,采用不同长度的外粘接(EB) CFRP片材对板进行加固,诱导板端(PE)脱粘。分析了结构的破坏模式、载荷-挠曲/应变响应、韧性和界面应力等性能。提出了一种三参数弹性基础模型,用于量化界面应力和预测结构弯曲行为。结果表明,脱粘严重降低了承载力(38.20 ~ 66.99 %)、极限挠度(57.77 ~ 88.08 %)和韧性(73.50 ~ 96.24 %),严重限制了CFRP利用率仅为12.35 ~ 40.29 %。对于等长UHTCC/CFRP层,界面I(混凝土-UHTCC)在末端应力最大,界面II (UHTCC- frp)应力峰值出现在跨中和端部之间,两者界面应力均随加固长度的增加而减小。当UHTCC长度大于CFRP时,两个界面最终均达到峰值应力。当CFRP长度从100 mm增加到400 mm时,界面I端应力与CFRP长度无关,界面II的峰值应力降低了94.13% %。该理论模型准确地预测了剥离位置,并提供了合理的初始刚度和极限挠度估计。然而,弹性框架会导致对承载能力预测的高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信