Advances in Determining the Flammability Limits of Combustible Gases: Standard Methods, Temperature–Pressure Effects, Emerging Fuels, and Outlook

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Chang Qi*, , , Yujie Lin, , , Guanlin Peng, , , Yi Liu, , , Anfeng Yu*, , and , Jianwei Cheng, 
{"title":"Advances in Determining the Flammability Limits of Combustible Gases: Standard Methods, Temperature–Pressure Effects, Emerging Fuels, and Outlook","authors":"Chang Qi*,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Yujie Lin,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Guanlin Peng,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Yi Liu,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Anfeng Yu*,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Jianwei Cheng,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The flammability limits (FLs) of combustible gases are critical parameters for assessing fire and explosion risks in industrial processes. This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date synthesis of recent advances in the determination and interpretation of FL, with a particular focus on conditions of elevated temperature and pressure that are increasingly relevant in emerging energy systems. Compared to previous reviews, this paper offers three key contributions: (1) it compiles the latest experimental data and methods for FL determination under nonambient conditions, highlighting methodological differences across international standards (e.g., ASTM, EN, GB) and their implications for reproducibility; (2) it critically examines the flammability behavior of next-generation fuels─including hydrogen, ammonia, and their mixtures─while identifying the limitations of conventional predictive tools such as Le Chatelier’s law; (3) it proposes prioritized future research directions based on the urgency of addressing experimental, regulatory, and kinetic knowledge gaps. By bridging experimental findings, standardization challenges, and industrial safety needs, this review aims to guide future efforts in developing safer, more accurate, and application-driven approaches to FL evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 38","pages":"18218–18250"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The flammability limits (FLs) of combustible gases are critical parameters for assessing fire and explosion risks in industrial processes. This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date synthesis of recent advances in the determination and interpretation of FL, with a particular focus on conditions of elevated temperature and pressure that are increasingly relevant in emerging energy systems. Compared to previous reviews, this paper offers three key contributions: (1) it compiles the latest experimental data and methods for FL determination under nonambient conditions, highlighting methodological differences across international standards (e.g., ASTM, EN, GB) and their implications for reproducibility; (2) it critically examines the flammability behavior of next-generation fuels─including hydrogen, ammonia, and their mixtures─while identifying the limitations of conventional predictive tools such as Le Chatelier’s law; (3) it proposes prioritized future research directions based on the urgency of addressing experimental, regulatory, and kinetic knowledge gaps. By bridging experimental findings, standardization challenges, and industrial safety needs, this review aims to guide future efforts in developing safer, more accurate, and application-driven approaches to FL evaluation.

Abstract Image

测定可燃气体可燃性极限的进展:标准方法、温度-压力效应、新兴燃料和展望
可燃性限值(FLs)是评估工业过程中火灾和爆炸风险的关键参数。这篇综述对FL的测定和解释方面的最新进展进行了全面的综合,特别关注在新兴能源系统中日益相关的温度和压力升高的条件。与以往的综述相比,本文提供了三个关键贡献:(1)汇编了非环境条件下测定FL的最新实验数据和方法,突出了国际标准(如ASTM, EN, GB)的方法差异及其对可重复性的影响;(2)批判性地考察下一代燃料──包括氢、氨及其混合物──的可燃性行为,同时发现勒夏特列定律等传统预测工具的局限性;(3)基于解决实验、监管和动力学知识缺口的紧迫性,提出了未来的优先研究方向。通过结合实验结果、标准化挑战和工业安全需求,本综述旨在指导未来开发更安全、更准确和应用驱动的FL评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信