Supply Chain Assessment of Water Scarcity and Management Measures in Chinese Cities Based on Water Quantity and Quality.

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Yunlei She,Jiayang Chen,Qi Zhou,Siyi Wei,Mimi Gong,Qianzi Wang,Ke Yu,Yuanzhen Li,Yong Zhao,Shen Qu
{"title":"Supply Chain Assessment of Water Scarcity and Management Measures in Chinese Cities Based on Water Quantity and Quality.","authors":"Yunlei She,Jiayang Chen,Qi Zhou,Siyi Wei,Mimi Gong,Qianzi Wang,Ke Yu,Yuanzhen Li,Yong Zhao,Shen Qu","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c07293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China is facing the dual pressure of water scarcity, in terms of both quantity and quality. Existing studies often ignore the monthly variation in water quality and lack an integrated prefectural-level assessment of quantity-quality-environmental flow requirement (EFR) water scarcity. Moreover, conventional methods for estimating water scarcity risk depend on subjective assumptions and ignore adaptive behaviors, limiting accuracy. This study developed a multiagent complex network model integrating monthly data on water quality from 3,646 national monitoring stations, municipal water use inventories, and EFR constraints to assess water scarcity-induced supply chain losses. Findings show that incorporating water quality restrictions increases water-scarce cities from 81 to 89, the shortage volume by 17.7%, and losses by 5%. Several cities, such as Lanzhou, Shanghai, Zhengzhou, and Taiyuan, have experienced a localized water scarcity with significant impacts. Water quality-related losses are concentrated in the industrialized northern plains. We evaluated three management strategies: water quality improvement, reclaimed water use, and the Water Diversion Project. Their combined implementation reduced water scarcity in 62 cities and generated benefits of 39-40.7 billion Chinese Yuan. This study quantifies the impacts of water scarcity on cross-regional and cross-sectoral supply chains and provides essential evidence for guiding sustainable and resilient water management.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c07293","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China is facing the dual pressure of water scarcity, in terms of both quantity and quality. Existing studies often ignore the monthly variation in water quality and lack an integrated prefectural-level assessment of quantity-quality-environmental flow requirement (EFR) water scarcity. Moreover, conventional methods for estimating water scarcity risk depend on subjective assumptions and ignore adaptive behaviors, limiting accuracy. This study developed a multiagent complex network model integrating monthly data on water quality from 3,646 national monitoring stations, municipal water use inventories, and EFR constraints to assess water scarcity-induced supply chain losses. Findings show that incorporating water quality restrictions increases water-scarce cities from 81 to 89, the shortage volume by 17.7%, and losses by 5%. Several cities, such as Lanzhou, Shanghai, Zhengzhou, and Taiyuan, have experienced a localized water scarcity with significant impacts. Water quality-related losses are concentrated in the industrialized northern plains. We evaluated three management strategies: water quality improvement, reclaimed water use, and the Water Diversion Project. Their combined implementation reduced water scarcity in 62 cities and generated benefits of 39-40.7 billion Chinese Yuan. This study quantifies the impacts of water scarcity on cross-regional and cross-sectoral supply chains and provides essential evidence for guiding sustainable and resilient water management.
基于水量和水质的中国城市水资源短缺供应链评价及管理对策
中国正面临着水资源数量和质量短缺的双重压力。现有的研究往往忽略了水质的月度变化,缺乏对数量-质量-环境流量需求(EFR)缺水的综合地级评估。此外,传统的水资源短缺风险评估方法依赖于主观假设,忽略了适应性行为,限制了准确性。本研究开发了一个多智能体复杂网络模型,整合了来自3,646个国家监测站、市政用水清单和EFR约束的月度水质数据,以评估水资源短缺导致的供应链损失。研究结果表明,纳入水质限制措施后,缺水城市从81个增加到89个,缺水量增加17.7%,损失增加5%。一些城市,如兰州、上海、郑州和太原,已经经历了严重的局部缺水问题。与水质有关的损失集中在工业化的北部平原。我们评估了三种管理策略:水质改善、中水利用和调水工程。他们的联合实施减少了62个城市的水资源短缺,产生了390 - 407亿元人民币的效益。本研究量化了水资源短缺对跨区域和跨部门供应链的影响,为指导可持续和有弹性的水资源管理提供了重要证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信