Cancer decentralized clinical trials in the veterans health administration.

Daphne R Friedman,Shannon L Elam,Sarah Bloemers,Zachary Burningham,Jacqueline Boreland,Ashlyn M Press,Jennifer Ordman,Crystal Okeke,Jo Martinez,Tiffany Stewart,Shelby Schoenborn,Perri Pepperman,Holly Morris,Bethany Oberg,Michael J Kelley
{"title":"Cancer decentralized clinical trials in the veterans health administration.","authors":"Daphne R Friedman,Shannon L Elam,Sarah Bloemers,Zachary Burningham,Jacqueline Boreland,Ashlyn M Press,Jennifer Ordman,Crystal Okeke,Jo Martinez,Tiffany Stewart,Shelby Schoenborn,Perri Pepperman,Holly Morris,Bethany Oberg,Michael J Kelley","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDespite the importance of clinical trials (CTs) in the advancement of cancer treatments, there are barriers to subject enrollment. Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) are conducted at a different physical location than where patients receive medical care and can address patient- and institutional-level barriers that impact subject enrollment.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe Veterans Health Administration (VA) created a cancer DCT program, with a dedicated research team, operational manual, and other standardized operational protocols to support DCT conduct. The DCT program works closely with the VA Office of Research and Development and VA central institutional review board.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTen cancer DCTs have been implemented two observational, five non-therapeutic interventional, and three therapeutic interventional. Eight were implemented as fully remote DCTs and two were hybrid DCTs, with hybrid requiring collaboration with local clinicians for non-research activities. Across 47 VA Medical Centers, 134 Veterans enrolled: 31 (23%) in observational, 99 (74%) in non-therapeutic interventional, and 4 (3%) in therapeutic interventional DCTs. Demographic characteristics of enrolled subjects mirror that of Veterans receiving cancer care through the VA the National TeleOncology service, including rurality (31%) and non-White minority status (19%). Examples of the methods for research conduct that have been used across these DCTs are included.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nCancer DCTs can address barriers to subject enrollment, but not every CT is appropriate to be conducted as a DCT. By sharing experiences regarding the conduct of cancer DCTs in the VA, research sponsors, regulatory authorities, and other research groups can more readily and widely implement DCTs.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Despite the importance of clinical trials (CTs) in the advancement of cancer treatments, there are barriers to subject enrollment. Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) are conducted at a different physical location than where patients receive medical care and can address patient- and institutional-level barriers that impact subject enrollment. METHODS The Veterans Health Administration (VA) created a cancer DCT program, with a dedicated research team, operational manual, and other standardized operational protocols to support DCT conduct. The DCT program works closely with the VA Office of Research and Development and VA central institutional review board. RESULTS Ten cancer DCTs have been implemented two observational, five non-therapeutic interventional, and three therapeutic interventional. Eight were implemented as fully remote DCTs and two were hybrid DCTs, with hybrid requiring collaboration with local clinicians for non-research activities. Across 47 VA Medical Centers, 134 Veterans enrolled: 31 (23%) in observational, 99 (74%) in non-therapeutic interventional, and 4 (3%) in therapeutic interventional DCTs. Demographic characteristics of enrolled subjects mirror that of Veterans receiving cancer care through the VA the National TeleOncology service, including rurality (31%) and non-White minority status (19%). Examples of the methods for research conduct that have been used across these DCTs are included. CONCLUSIONS Cancer DCTs can address barriers to subject enrollment, but not every CT is appropriate to be conducted as a DCT. By sharing experiences regarding the conduct of cancer DCTs in the VA, research sponsors, regulatory authorities, and other research groups can more readily and widely implement DCTs.
癌症分散临床试验在退伍军人健康管理局。
尽管临床试验(ct)在癌症治疗的进展中具有重要意义,但在受试者入组方面存在障碍。分散临床试验(dct)在不同于患者接受医疗护理的物理位置进行,可以解决影响受试者入组的患者和机构层面的障碍。方法退伍军人健康管理局(VA)创建了一个癌症DCT项目,有专门的研究团队、操作手册和其他标准化操作协议来支持DCT的实施。DCT项目与退伍军人事务部研究与发展办公室和退伍军人事务部中央机构审查委员会密切合作。结果10例肿瘤dct实施了2例观察性、5例非治疗性介入、3例治疗性介入。其中8项为完全远程dct, 2项为混合型dct,混合型dct需要与当地临床医生合作进行非研究活动。在47个VA医疗中心,134名退伍军人入组:观察性dct 31人(23%),非治疗性介入99人(74%),治疗性介入4人(3%)。登记受试者的人口统计学特征反映了通过VA(国家肿瘤电视服务)接受癌症治疗的退伍军人,包括农村(31%)和非白人少数民族(19%)。包括在这些dct中使用的研究行为方法的示例。结论肿瘤CT可以解决受试者入组的障碍,但并非所有CT都适合作为DCT进行。通过分享弗吉尼亚州开展癌症dct的经验,研究发起人、监管机构和其他研究小组可以更容易、更广泛地实施dct。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信