Hospice Social Worker and Nurse Perceptions of the Usability of a Hospice Live Discharge Protocol (LDP).

IF 1.4
Stephanie P Wladkowski, Susan Enguídanos, Tracy A Schroepfer
{"title":"Hospice Social Worker and Nurse Perceptions of the Usability of a Hospice Live Discharge Protocol (LDP).","authors":"Stephanie P Wladkowski, Susan Enguídanos, Tracy A Schroepfer","doi":"10.1177/10499091251383107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundLive discharges from hospice are often distressing for patients, caregivers, and hospice providers alike, disrupting care continuity and leading to emotional and logistical challenges. Despite Medicare's discharge planning requirement, no standardized process currently exists for hospice-initiated discharges, resulting in variable quality of care transitions. In response, a Live Discharge Protocol (LDP) was developed; however, the usability of this protocol in practice has not been evaluated.MethodsPurposive, convenience sampling occurred over 1 month. Participants were hospice social workers (n = 10), and hospice nurses (n = 10) recruited through professional networks and social media. Open-ended survey questions were used, and data was analyzed using conventional content analysis.ResultsAcross all four steps of the LDP, no concerns with the clarity of language, instructions, and flow of the LDP were reported; however, challenges in implementation were noted across steps. Specifically, collaboration with team members and having clear roles, managing the logistics of discharge, supporting the patient/caregiver reactions to the discharge, and incorporating a new practice into existing work structure.ConclusionsAn explicit Live Discharge Protocol has strong potential to enhance the quality and consistency of a live discharge from hospice care. The LDP provides a framework to help smooth the transition from hospice care and provides patients and families with post-discharge support. Feedback from hospice professionals affirmed the relevance and usability of each step within the LDP, while also identifying opportunities for refinement for future implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"1290-1296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251383107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundLive discharges from hospice are often distressing for patients, caregivers, and hospice providers alike, disrupting care continuity and leading to emotional and logistical challenges. Despite Medicare's discharge planning requirement, no standardized process currently exists for hospice-initiated discharges, resulting in variable quality of care transitions. In response, a Live Discharge Protocol (LDP) was developed; however, the usability of this protocol in practice has not been evaluated.MethodsPurposive, convenience sampling occurred over 1 month. Participants were hospice social workers (n = 10), and hospice nurses (n = 10) recruited through professional networks and social media. Open-ended survey questions were used, and data was analyzed using conventional content analysis.ResultsAcross all four steps of the LDP, no concerns with the clarity of language, instructions, and flow of the LDP were reported; however, challenges in implementation were noted across steps. Specifically, collaboration with team members and having clear roles, managing the logistics of discharge, supporting the patient/caregiver reactions to the discharge, and incorporating a new practice into existing work structure.ConclusionsAn explicit Live Discharge Protocol has strong potential to enhance the quality and consistency of a live discharge from hospice care. The LDP provides a framework to help smooth the transition from hospice care and provides patients and families with post-discharge support. Feedback from hospice professionals affirmed the relevance and usability of each step within the LDP, while also identifying opportunities for refinement for future implementation.

安宁疗护社工与护士对安宁疗护出院协议可用性的看法。
临终关怀的现场出院对病人、照顾者和临终关怀提供者来说都是痛苦的,破坏了护理的连续性,并导致了情感和后勤方面的挑战。尽管医疗保险的出院计划的要求,没有标准化的程序目前存在的临终关怀发起的出院,导致护理质量的变化过渡。为此,制定了动态放电协议(LDP);然而,该协议在实践中的可用性尚未得到评估。方法1个月以上为阳性、方便抽样。参与者是通过专业网络和社交媒体招募的安宁疗护社工(n = 10)和安宁疗护护士(n = 10)。采用开放式调查问题,数据分析采用常规内容分析。结果:在自民党的所有四个步骤中,没有人担心自民党的语言清晰度、指示和流程;但是,各步骤都注意到执行方面的挑战。具体而言,与团队成员合作,明确角色,管理出院后勤,支持患者/护理人员对出院的反应,并将新的实践纳入现有的工作结构。结论明确的现场出院方案对提高安宁疗护现场出院的质量和一致性具有很大的潜力。自民党提供了一个框架,以帮助从临终关怀顺利过渡,并为病人和家属提供出院后的支持。来自临终关怀专业人员的反馈肯定了LDP中每个步骤的相关性和可用性,同时也确定了改进未来实施的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书