Visual and Anatomic Outcomes of Vitrectomy for Myopic Maculoschisis with and without Macular Detachment: A Case-Control Study.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jun Li, Chonglin Chen, Sufen Lu, Xiaoyang Ding, Chun Zhang
{"title":"Visual and Anatomic Outcomes of Vitrectomy for Myopic Maculoschisis with and without Macular Detachment: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Jun Li, Chonglin Chen, Sufen Lu, Xiaoyang Ding, Chun Zhang","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the visual and anatomic outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) between myopic maculoschisis with and without macular detachment (MD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study included 38 eyes of 38 patients who received PPV for myopic maculoschisis between July 2021 and July 2022. Two groups were identified based on whether preoperative MD was detected via optical coherence tomography (OCT): 16 eyes with MD and 22 eyes without MD. Surgical effects were assessed by the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ellipsoid zone (EZ) state, and the rate of complete fovea relief.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The postoperative follow-up were 15.25 ± 3.70 and 15.55 ± 3.39 months in the groups with and without MD, respectively ( P = 0.800). The preoperative logMAR BCVA was 1.21 ± 0.65 and 0.55 ± 0.37 in the groups with and without MD, respectively ( P = 0.001). Nevertheless, no difference existed in the postoperative BCVA at final visit between the groups with and without MD (0.51 ± 0.29 logMAR, ∼20/64 VS . 0.40 ± 0.41 logMAR, ∼20/50, P = 0.345). During the follow-up period, the rates of EZ band reconstruction were 40.00% (6/15) and 33.33% (2/6) in the groups with and without MD, respectively ( P = 0.590). Finally, a total of 33 eyes achieved complete fovea relief, including 13 eyes (81.25%) in the group with MD and 20 eyes (90.91%) in the group without MD ( P = 0.701).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In myopic maculoschisis eyes, the presence of MD did not significantly affect postoperative visual or anatomical outcomes in our cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the visual and anatomic outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) between myopic maculoschisis with and without macular detachment (MD).

Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 38 eyes of 38 patients who received PPV for myopic maculoschisis between July 2021 and July 2022. Two groups were identified based on whether preoperative MD was detected via optical coherence tomography (OCT): 16 eyes with MD and 22 eyes without MD. Surgical effects were assessed by the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ellipsoid zone (EZ) state, and the rate of complete fovea relief.

Results: The postoperative follow-up were 15.25 ± 3.70 and 15.55 ± 3.39 months in the groups with and without MD, respectively ( P = 0.800). The preoperative logMAR BCVA was 1.21 ± 0.65 and 0.55 ± 0.37 in the groups with and without MD, respectively ( P = 0.001). Nevertheless, no difference existed in the postoperative BCVA at final visit between the groups with and without MD (0.51 ± 0.29 logMAR, ∼20/64 VS . 0.40 ± 0.41 logMAR, ∼20/50, P = 0.345). During the follow-up period, the rates of EZ band reconstruction were 40.00% (6/15) and 33.33% (2/6) in the groups with and without MD, respectively ( P = 0.590). Finally, a total of 33 eyes achieved complete fovea relief, including 13 eyes (81.25%) in the group with MD and 20 eyes (90.91%) in the group without MD ( P = 0.701).

Conclusion: In myopic maculoschisis eyes, the presence of MD did not significantly affect postoperative visual or anatomical outcomes in our cohort.

伴有和不伴有黄斑脱离的近视黄斑裂玻璃体切除术的视觉和解剖结果:一项病例对照研究。
目的:比较伴和不伴黄斑脱离(MD)的近视黄斑裂玻璃体切除术(PPV)的视觉和解剖效果。方法:本回顾性比较研究包括在2021年7月至2022年7月期间接受PPV治疗的38例近视黄斑裂患者的38只眼。根据术前是否通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检测到MD分为两组:16只眼有MD, 22只眼无MD。通过最终最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、椭球区(EZ)状态和中央凹完全缓解率来评估手术效果。结果:有MD组术后随访15.25±3.70个月,无MD组术后随访15.55±3.39个月(P = 0.800)。MD组和非MD组术前logMAR BCVA分别为1.21±0.65和0.55±0.37 (P = 0.001)。然而,有MD组和没有MD组在最后一次就诊时的BCVA没有差异(0.51±0.29 logMAR, ~ 20/64 VS. 0.40±0.41 logMAR, ~ 20/50, P = 0.345)。随访期间,有无MD组EZ波段重建率分别为40.00%(6/15)和33.33%(2/6),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.590)。最终33只眼获得完全的中央凹缓解,其中MD组13只眼(81.25%),非MD组20只眼(90.91%)(P = 0.701)。结论:在近视黄斑裂眼中,MD的存在并没有显著影响术后视力或解剖结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信