Experimentally Induced Knee Effusion Does Not Simulate Sustained Ground Reaction Force Profiles During Overground Walking.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Katherine Collins, Brian Pietrosimone, Timothy Lindsay, Heather Myers, Anthony S Ceraulo, Brian C Lau, Sergio A Lemus, Laura S Pietrosimone
{"title":"Experimentally Induced Knee Effusion Does Not Simulate Sustained Ground Reaction Force Profiles During Overground Walking.","authors":"Katherine Collins, Brian Pietrosimone, Timothy Lindsay, Heather Myers, Anthony S Ceraulo, Brian C Lau, Sergio A Lemus, Laura S Pietrosimone","doi":"10.1123/jab.2025-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Less dynamic limb-level loading is observed bilaterally in individuals who have undergone unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and is linked with the development and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Experimentally induced knee effusion (EIKE) models have been used to study biomechanical effects of knee injury, showing decreased quadriceps activation and lesser peak limb-level loading (ie, vertical ground reaction force [vGRF]) during stair descent and decreased knee extensor torque during overground walking. However, it is unknown whether EIKE acutely induces less dynamic limb-level loading during overground walking. Therefore, this study's purpose was to investigate bilateral effects of unilateral EIKE on limb-level loading throughout stance. Ten individuals completed 5 gait trials at their habitual walking speed pre-EIKE and post-EIKE. Functional waveform analyses compared time-normalized vGRFs, anteroposterior GRFs, and mediolateral GRFs normalized to body weight (BW) pre-EIKE and post-EIKE. EIKE resulted in less dynamic anteroposterior GRFs from 16% to 24% of stance (mean difference: 2%BW) and no change in vGRFs of the effused limb. The contralateral limb demonstrated greater vGRFs from 6% to 35% of stance (mean difference: 10%BW) and greater anteroposterior GRFs from 13% to 19% of stance (mean difference: -2%BW). Our results indicate that unilateral EIKE does not simulate bilateral sustained compressive loading profiles previously linked to knee osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2025-0013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Less dynamic limb-level loading is observed bilaterally in individuals who have undergone unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and is linked with the development and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Experimentally induced knee effusion (EIKE) models have been used to study biomechanical effects of knee injury, showing decreased quadriceps activation and lesser peak limb-level loading (ie, vertical ground reaction force [vGRF]) during stair descent and decreased knee extensor torque during overground walking. However, it is unknown whether EIKE acutely induces less dynamic limb-level loading during overground walking. Therefore, this study's purpose was to investigate bilateral effects of unilateral EIKE on limb-level loading throughout stance. Ten individuals completed 5 gait trials at their habitual walking speed pre-EIKE and post-EIKE. Functional waveform analyses compared time-normalized vGRFs, anteroposterior GRFs, and mediolateral GRFs normalized to body weight (BW) pre-EIKE and post-EIKE. EIKE resulted in less dynamic anteroposterior GRFs from 16% to 24% of stance (mean difference: 2%BW) and no change in vGRFs of the effused limb. The contralateral limb demonstrated greater vGRFs from 6% to 35% of stance (mean difference: 10%BW) and greater anteroposterior GRFs from 13% to 19% of stance (mean difference: -2%BW). Our results indicate that unilateral EIKE does not simulate bilateral sustained compressive loading profiles previously linked to knee osteoarthritis.

实验诱导的膝关节积液不能模拟地面行走过程中持续的地面反作用力。
在接受单侧前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)的个体中,双侧观察到较少的动态肢水平负荷,这与膝关节骨关节炎的发生和进展有关。实验诱导的膝关节积液(EIKE)模型被用于研究膝关节损伤的生物力学效应,结果显示,下楼梯时四头肌激活减少,四肢水平负荷峰值(即垂直地面反力[vGRF])减少,地上行走时膝关节伸肌扭矩减少。然而,尚不清楚EIKE是否会在地上行走时引起较少的动态肢水平负荷。因此,本研究的目的是研究单侧EIKE在整个站立过程中对四肢水平负荷的双边影响。10名受试者以他们的习惯步行速度完成了eike前后的5次步态试验。功能波形分析比较了时间归一化的vgrf、正位grf和中外侧grf在eike前和eike后的体重归一化。EIKE导致动态正位GRFs从16%减少到24%(平均差值:2%BW),积液肢体的vGRFs没有变化。对侧肢体表现出更高的vGRFs,从站立的6%到35%(平均差值:10%BW),从站立的13%到19%(平均差值:-2%BW)。我们的研究结果表明,单侧EIKE不能模拟以前与膝关节骨关节炎相关的双侧持续压缩负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Journal of Applied Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics (JAB) is to disseminate the highest quality peer-reviewed studies that utilize biomechanical strategies to advance the study of human movement. Areas of interest include clinical biomechanics, gait and posture mechanics, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular biomechanics, sport mechanics, and biomechanical modeling. Studies of sport performance that explicitly generalize to broader activities, contribute substantially to fundamental understanding of human motion, or are in a sport that enjoys wide participation, are welcome. Also within the scope of JAB are studies using biomechanical strategies to investigate the structure, control, function, and state (health and disease) of animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信