Are Assisted Dying and Palliative Care Intersecting in Australian Clinical Practice? A Case Series.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julia Corfield, Hannah Gooiker, Melanie Benson, Sandeep Bhagat
{"title":"Are Assisted Dying and Palliative Care Intersecting in Australian Clinical Practice? A Case Series.","authors":"Julia Corfield, Hannah Gooiker, Melanie Benson, Sandeep Bhagat","doi":"10.1177/08258597251380354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesAssisted dying and palliative care represent distinct approaches to addressing the needs of patients with advanced, progressive, and life-limiting illness. Although 5 years have passed since the Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) Act was passed in Victoria (Australia), little is known about the VAD and palliative care interface in clinical practice. This retrospective case series examined patients who requested VAD and received inpatient specialist palliative care (SPC).MethodsRetrospective case series of patients admitted to a single-site public palliative care unit (PCU) between June 2019 and June 2024, who had enquired about or requested VAD at any point in time.Results6% of patients admitted to the PCU enquired about or requested VAD at any point in time; 2% raised VAD during their PCU admission, while the remaining patients were admitted with existing requests made in other healthcare settings. A small proportion of patients had VAD requests made by caregivers or had statements misinterpreted as VAD requests. Requests for VAD were made to palliative care professionals (50%) across multiple settings where palliative care is delivered. Most patients (44%) did not progress past an initial request for VAD, and 32% made requests in their final 2 weeks of life. Four patients administered the VAD substance and died while in the PCU. In the PCU, patients discussed VAD with their treating team (number of documented conversations ranging from 0 to 25 during admission).ConclusionsThis case series highlights a tangible intersection between SPC and VAD in that patients enquired about and requested VAD to palliative care teams, and in the PCU, they discussed and completed VAD. Implications for SPC will be discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"8258597251380354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597251380354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesAssisted dying and palliative care represent distinct approaches to addressing the needs of patients with advanced, progressive, and life-limiting illness. Although 5 years have passed since the Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) Act was passed in Victoria (Australia), little is known about the VAD and palliative care interface in clinical practice. This retrospective case series examined patients who requested VAD and received inpatient specialist palliative care (SPC).MethodsRetrospective case series of patients admitted to a single-site public palliative care unit (PCU) between June 2019 and June 2024, who had enquired about or requested VAD at any point in time.Results6% of patients admitted to the PCU enquired about or requested VAD at any point in time; 2% raised VAD during their PCU admission, while the remaining patients were admitted with existing requests made in other healthcare settings. A small proportion of patients had VAD requests made by caregivers or had statements misinterpreted as VAD requests. Requests for VAD were made to palliative care professionals (50%) across multiple settings where palliative care is delivered. Most patients (44%) did not progress past an initial request for VAD, and 32% made requests in their final 2 weeks of life. Four patients administered the VAD substance and died while in the PCU. In the PCU, patients discussed VAD with their treating team (number of documented conversations ranging from 0 to 25 during admission).ConclusionsThis case series highlights a tangible intersection between SPC and VAD in that patients enquired about and requested VAD to palliative care teams, and in the PCU, they discussed and completed VAD. Implications for SPC will be discussed.

辅助死亡和姑息治疗在澳大利亚临床实践中交叉吗?案例系列。
目的:辅助死亡和姑息治疗是解决晚期、进展性和生命受限疾病患者需求的不同方法。尽管自澳大利亚维多利亚州通过自愿协助死亡法案(VAD)以来已经过去了5年,但在临床实践中,人们对VAD与姑息治疗的结合知之甚少。本回顾性病例系列研究了要求VAD并接受住院专科姑息治疗(SPC)的患者。方法回顾性分析2019年6月至2024年6月在单一地点公共姑息治疗单位(PCU)就诊的患者,这些患者在任何时间点都曾询问或要求过VAD。结果在PCU就诊的患者中,有6%的患者在任何时间点询问或要求VAD;2%的患者在PCU入院期间VAD升高,而其余患者则在其他医疗机构提出现有请求。一小部分患者有由护理人员提出的VAD请求,或者有被误解为VAD请求的陈述。在提供姑息治疗的多个环境中,向姑息治疗专业人员提出了VAD请求(50%)。大多数患者(44%)在最初的VAD请求后没有进展,32%的患者在生命的最后2周提出了请求。四名患者服用了VAD物质,并在PCU中死亡。在PCU中,患者与治疗小组讨论VAD(入院期间记录的谈话次数从0到25次不等)。本病例系列强调了SPC和VAD之间的实际交集,因为患者向姑息治疗团队询问并要求VAD,并且在PCU中,他们讨论并完成VAD。对SPC的影响将被讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信