Investigation of Q Angle and Related Factors in Osteoporosis Patients.

IF 1.2 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nurseda Başgün, Muhammet Şahin Elbastı, Songül Bağlan Yentü
{"title":"Investigation of Q Angle and Related Factors in Osteoporosis Patients.","authors":"Nurseda Başgün, Muhammet Şahin Elbastı, Songül Bağlan Yentü","doi":"10.5152/eurasianjmed.2025.25946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background: The aim of this study was to examine the Q angle in patients diagnosed with osteoporosis, osteopenia, and osteoarthritis and to compare the groups with each other. Methods: This study included 22 female patients diagnosed with osteoporosis, 22 female patients diagnosed with osteopenia, and 22 female patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis, aged 40-65 years. Q angle, pain, lower extremity muscle strength, foot posture, and pes planus were assessed using a goniometer, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale, Foot Posture Index (FPI), and Navicular Drop Test (NDT), respectively. Results: There was a statistical difference in both right and left Q angle in osteoporosis compared to osteoarthritis (P=.009, P=.002, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in both right and left Q angle between osteoporosis and osteopenia (P=.730, P=.491, respectively), and osteopenia and osteoarthritis (P=.022, P=.017, respectively). However, a statistically significant difference was found between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis in the right (P=.009) and left (P=.002) sides. In addition, a significant negative correlation was found between Q angle and FPI and NDT in all patients in this study (P < .01). Conclusion: Patients with osteoporosis were found to have a higher Q angle than osteoarthritis and osteopenia patients. In addition, foot posture and pes planus were found to be associated with the Q angle. Osteoporosis patients may have a tendency to valgum.</p>","PeriodicalId":53592,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine","volume":"57 2","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2025.25946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the Q angle in patients diagnosed with osteoporosis, osteopenia, and osteoarthritis and to compare the groups with each other. Methods: This study included 22 female patients diagnosed with osteoporosis, 22 female patients diagnosed with osteopenia, and 22 female patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis, aged 40-65 years. Q angle, pain, lower extremity muscle strength, foot posture, and pes planus were assessed using a goniometer, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale, Foot Posture Index (FPI), and Navicular Drop Test (NDT), respectively. Results: There was a statistical difference in both right and left Q angle in osteoporosis compared to osteoarthritis (P=.009, P=.002, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in both right and left Q angle between osteoporosis and osteopenia (P=.730, P=.491, respectively), and osteopenia and osteoarthritis (P=.022, P=.017, respectively). However, a statistically significant difference was found between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis in the right (P=.009) and left (P=.002) sides. In addition, a significant negative correlation was found between Q angle and FPI and NDT in all patients in this study (P < .01). Conclusion: Patients with osteoporosis were found to have a higher Q angle than osteoarthritis and osteopenia patients. In addition, foot posture and pes planus were found to be associated with the Q angle. Osteoporosis patients may have a tendency to valgum.

骨质疏松症患者Q角及相关因素的调查。
背景:本研究的目的是研究骨质疏松症、骨质减少症和骨关节炎患者的Q角,并进行组间比较。方法:本研究纳入22例女性骨质疏松症患者、22例女性骨质减少症患者和22例女性骨关节炎患者,年龄40 ~ 65岁。分别使用测角仪、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、医学研究委员会量表(MRC)、足部姿势指数(FPI)和舟状落差试验(NDT)评估Q角、疼痛、下肢肌肉力量、足部姿势和平足。结果:骨质疏松与骨关节炎的左、右Q角比较,差异均有统计学意义(P= 0.009, P= 0.002)。骨质疏松与骨质减少(P= 0.730, P= 0.491)、骨质减少与骨关节炎(P= 0.022, P= 0.017)的左、右Q角差异均无统计学意义。然而,骨质疏松症和骨关节炎在右侧(P= 0.009)和左侧(P= 0.002)之间存在统计学差异。此外,本研究中所有患者的Q角与FPI和NDT呈显著负相关(P < 0.01)。结论:骨质疏松患者的Q角高于骨关节炎和骨质减少患者。此外,足部姿势和平足与Q角有关。骨质疏松症患者可能有外翻的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurasian Journal of Medicine
Eurasian Journal of Medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
59
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Eurasian Journal of Medicine (Eurasian J Med) is an international, scientific, open access periodical published by independent, unbiased, and triple-blinded peer-review principles. The journal is the official publication of Atatürk University School of Medicine and published triannually in February, June, and October. The publication language of the journal is English. The aim of the Eurasian Journal of Medicine is to publish original research papers of the highest scientific and clinical value in all medical fields. The Eurasian J Med also includes reviews, editorial short notes and letters to the editor that either as a comment related to recently published articles in our journal or as a case report. The target audience of the journal includes researchers, physicians and healthcare professionals who are interested or working in in all medical disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信