Asymmetry in Cross-Sex Cross-Trait Genetic Covariances and the Evolvability of Sexual Dimorphism.

IF 2.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
American Naturalist Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-18 DOI:10.1086/737019
Mathieu Videlier, Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
{"title":"Asymmetry in Cross-Sex Cross-Trait Genetic Covariances and the Evolvability of Sexual Dimorphism.","authors":"Mathieu Videlier, Jacqueline L Sztepanacz","doi":"10.1086/737019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractThe evolution of sexual dimorphism is predicted to resolve conflict that can arise from divergent evolutionary interests between sexes, enabling each sex to reach its fitness optimum. However, most of the genome is shared between sexes, which can lead to a genetic constraint for dimorphism evolution. Most studies of intersexual genetic constraints have focused on the effect of genetic correlations, <i>r<sub>mf</sub></i>, for single traits. However, multivariate studies of the <b>B</b> matrix of intersexual genetic covariances suggest that sexual dimorphism may be more evolvable than inferred from <i>r<sub>mf</sub></i> because of the potential for indirect responses to selection from correlated traits. To comprehensively address this question, we collected and reanalyzed published estimates of <b>B</b> using a recently developed approach to quantify the evolvability of sexual monomorphism and dimorphism. We find that across the traits and species we study, the evolvability of dimorphism is lower than that of monomorphism, but also that sexually concordant and antagonistic selection are almost equally capable of producing dimorphism. We also find that asymmetry in <b>B</b> would affect the response to selection more in females than in males. Our results show that sexual dimorphism is more evolvable than studies of <i>r<sub>mf</sub></i> suggest and underscore that sexually antagonistic selection is not required for the evolution of sexual dimorphism.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"206 4","pages":"362-374"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/737019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe evolution of sexual dimorphism is predicted to resolve conflict that can arise from divergent evolutionary interests between sexes, enabling each sex to reach its fitness optimum. However, most of the genome is shared between sexes, which can lead to a genetic constraint for dimorphism evolution. Most studies of intersexual genetic constraints have focused on the effect of genetic correlations, rmf, for single traits. However, multivariate studies of the B matrix of intersexual genetic covariances suggest that sexual dimorphism may be more evolvable than inferred from rmf because of the potential for indirect responses to selection from correlated traits. To comprehensively address this question, we collected and reanalyzed published estimates of B using a recently developed approach to quantify the evolvability of sexual monomorphism and dimorphism. We find that across the traits and species we study, the evolvability of dimorphism is lower than that of monomorphism, but also that sexually concordant and antagonistic selection are almost equally capable of producing dimorphism. We also find that asymmetry in B would affect the response to selection more in females than in males. Our results show that sexual dimorphism is more evolvable than studies of rmf suggest and underscore that sexually antagonistic selection is not required for the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

跨性别、跨性状遗传协方差的不对称性及两性二态现象的可进化性。
摘要两性二态性的进化被认为是为了解决两性之间因进化利益不同而产生的冲突,使两性都能达到最适性。然而,大多数基因组在两性之间是共享的,这可能导致二态进化的遗传限制。大多数关于间性遗传约束的研究都集中在单个性状的遗传相关性(rmf)上。然而,对两性间遗传协方差B矩阵的多变量研究表明,两性二态性可能比rmf推断的更具可进化性,因为可能对相关性状的选择产生间接反应。为了全面解决这个问题,我们收集并重新分析了已发表的B估计,使用最近开发的方法来量化性单态和二态的可进化性。我们发现,在我们所研究的性状和物种中,二态性的进化能力低于单态性,但两性和谐选择和拮抗选择几乎同样能够产生二态性。我们还发现,B的不对称性对女性的选择反应的影响大于男性。我们的研究结果表明,两性二态现象比rmf研究表明的更具可进化性,并强调两性二态现象的进化不需要性别拮抗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Naturalist
American Naturalist 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信