Illustrations of the cerebrovascular system in Florentius Schuyl's Latin editions (1662, 1664) of René Descartes' Treatise on Man.

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Douglas J Lanska
{"title":"Illustrations of the cerebrovascular system in Florentius Schuyl's Latin editions (1662, 1664) of René Descartes' <i>Treatise on Man</i>.","authors":"Douglas J Lanska","doi":"10.1080/0964704X.2025.2557331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>Treatise on Man</i> (1662, 1664) by French philosopher René Descartes (1596-1650) is the primary source for Cartesian physiology, but the accompanying illustrations were created <i>after</i> Descartes' death by a group of Descartes' disciples who were forced to create illustrations for Descartes' unfinished, and often vague and confusing, text. The iconographic tradition originating in the French edition (<i>L'Homme</i>, 1664) has predominated since the 17th century, whereas the Latin editions (<i>De Homine</i>, 1662, 1664) and their illustrations remain little known. Dutch physician and botanist Florentius Schuyl (1619-1669) both edited and illustrated the Latin editions with woodcuts and copperplate engravings. Although Schuyl faithfully illustrated Descartes' mistaken notions concerning the location and motility of the pineal gland, other mistakes and innovations were due to Schuyl rather than Descartes. These include (1) the mistake of illustrating the mythical human rete mirabile more than a century after Jacopo Berengario da Carpi (1460-1530) and Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) had denied its existence in humans; (2) the mistake of illustrating an ungulate aortic arch as that of a human; and (3) the insight and courage to modify a Vesalian diagram to show a pre-Willisian circle of Willis, following Giulio Casseri (1552-1616) and Johann Vesling (1598-1649).</p>","PeriodicalId":49997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2025.2557331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Treatise on Man (1662, 1664) by French philosopher René Descartes (1596-1650) is the primary source for Cartesian physiology, but the accompanying illustrations were created after Descartes' death by a group of Descartes' disciples who were forced to create illustrations for Descartes' unfinished, and often vague and confusing, text. The iconographic tradition originating in the French edition (L'Homme, 1664) has predominated since the 17th century, whereas the Latin editions (De Homine, 1662, 1664) and their illustrations remain little known. Dutch physician and botanist Florentius Schuyl (1619-1669) both edited and illustrated the Latin editions with woodcuts and copperplate engravings. Although Schuyl faithfully illustrated Descartes' mistaken notions concerning the location and motility of the pineal gland, other mistakes and innovations were due to Schuyl rather than Descartes. These include (1) the mistake of illustrating the mythical human rete mirabile more than a century after Jacopo Berengario da Carpi (1460-1530) and Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) had denied its existence in humans; (2) the mistake of illustrating an ungulate aortic arch as that of a human; and (3) the insight and courage to modify a Vesalian diagram to show a pre-Willisian circle of Willis, following Giulio Casseri (1552-1616) and Johann Vesling (1598-1649).

弗洛伦提乌斯·舒尔(Florentius Schuyl) 1662年、1664年拉丁文版《笛卡尔人性论》中的脑血管系统插图。
法国哲学家笛卡尔(ren Descartes, 1596-1650)的《人论》(Treatise on Man, 1662 - 1664)是笛卡尔生理学的主要来源,但随附的插图是在笛卡尔死后由他的一群门徒创作的,他们被迫为笛卡尔未完成的、往往含糊不清、令人困惑的文本创作插图。自17世纪以来,源自法语版本(L'Homme, 1664)的肖像传统一直占据主导地位,而拉丁语版本(De Homine, 1662, 1664)及其插图则鲜为人知。荷兰内科医生和植物学家Florentius Schuyl(1619-1669)用木刻和铜版雕刻编辑和配图拉丁文版本。虽然Schuyl忠实地说明了笛卡尔关于松果体的位置和运动的错误观念,但其他错误和创新是由于Schuyl而不是笛卡尔。这些错误包括:(1)在雅各布·贝伦加里奥·达·卡尔皮(1460-1530)和安德烈亚斯·维萨里乌斯(1514-1564)否认人类中存在神话般的人类奇迹一个多世纪之后,错误地描绘了神话中的人类奇迹;(2)错误地将有蹄类主动脉弓描绘成人类的;(3)继朱利奥·卡塞里(1552-1616)和约翰·维斯林(1598-1649)之后,有洞察力和勇气修改维萨里图解,以显示威利斯之前的圆圈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the History of the Neurosciences
Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the History of the Neurosciences is the leading communication platform dealing with the historical roots of the basic and applied neurosciences. Its domains cover historical perspectives and developments, including biographical studies, disorders, institutions, documents, and instrumentation in neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropsychology, and the behavioral neurosciences. The history of ideas, changes in society and medicine, and the connections with other disciplines (e.g., the arts, philosophy, psychology) are welcome. In addition to original, full-length papers, the journal welcomes informative short communications, letters to the editors, book reviews, and contributions to its NeuroWords and Neurognostics columns. All manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by an Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, full- and short-length papers are subject to peer review (double blind, if requested) by at least 2 anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信