Disrupted Brain Connectivity in Newborns Following Antenatal Opioid Exposure.

IF 4.8
Josepheen De Asis-Cruz, Jung-Hoon Kim, Kushal Kapse, Yao Wu, Stephanie L Merhar, Carla M Bann, Jamie E Newman, Nicole Mack, Sara B DeMauro, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Scott A Lorch, Deanne Wilson-Costello, Brenda B Poindexter, Myriam Peralta-Carcelen, Jonathan M Davis, Catherine Limperopoulos
{"title":"Disrupted Brain Connectivity in Newborns Following Antenatal Opioid Exposure.","authors":"Josepheen De Asis-Cruz, Jung-Hoon Kim, Kushal Kapse, Yao Wu, Stephanie L Merhar, Carla M Bann, Jamie E Newman, Nicole Mack, Sara B DeMauro, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Scott A Lorch, Deanne Wilson-Costello, Brenda B Poindexter, Myriam Peralta-Carcelen, Jonathan M Davis, Catherine Limperopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The neural bases of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in antenatal opioid exposure are poorly understood. Very limited in vivo human newborn imaging studies have reported disrupted functional connectivity (FC) in limbic and reward-related brain regions, but these studies used small samples and lacked matched controls. Our objective was to compare brain FC in antenatal opioid-exposed and unexposed newborns to study the impact of opioid exposure on early brain development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Resting state functional MRI data were collected using 3T MRIs at four centers as part of the prospective, observational Outcomes of Babies with Opioid Exposure study. We used seed-based correlation analysis to estimate the FC of 93 brain regions. Voxel-wise linear regression with covariate adjustment and correction for multiple comparisons was used to determine significant between-group differences. FC differences based on opioid type were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed 248 scans (158 opioid-exposed/90 unexposed). Canonical sensorimotor and higher-order resting state network maps in exposed newborns (mean postmenstrual age at MRI±sd:42.80±1.9wks,52M) were comparable to controls (42.82±2.2, 88; Dice indices>0.9 across seven networks). Exposed newborns showed decreased FC from seeds in bilateral pre- and left postcentral gyri, bilateral orbitofrontal regions, and cerebellum, and increased FC from seeds in peri-opercular, subcortical (e.g., amygdala, hippocampus, and putamen), and mid-to-superior occipital regions (family-wise error rate,α<0.05). Connectivity from 23/93 (24.7%) seeds differed between groups. Methadone- and buprenorphine-exposed newborns showed disrupted regional FC compared to controls, but no FC differences between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large sample of antenatally opioid-exposed newborns, we report altered organization of brain functional networks, particularly in integrative sensorimotor-affective circuits.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.09.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The neural bases of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in antenatal opioid exposure are poorly understood. Very limited in vivo human newborn imaging studies have reported disrupted functional connectivity (FC) in limbic and reward-related brain regions, but these studies used small samples and lacked matched controls. Our objective was to compare brain FC in antenatal opioid-exposed and unexposed newborns to study the impact of opioid exposure on early brain development.

Methods: Resting state functional MRI data were collected using 3T MRIs at four centers as part of the prospective, observational Outcomes of Babies with Opioid Exposure study. We used seed-based correlation analysis to estimate the FC of 93 brain regions. Voxel-wise linear regression with covariate adjustment and correction for multiple comparisons was used to determine significant between-group differences. FC differences based on opioid type were also investigated.

Results: We performed 248 scans (158 opioid-exposed/90 unexposed). Canonical sensorimotor and higher-order resting state network maps in exposed newborns (mean postmenstrual age at MRI±sd:42.80±1.9wks,52M) were comparable to controls (42.82±2.2, 88; Dice indices>0.9 across seven networks). Exposed newborns showed decreased FC from seeds in bilateral pre- and left postcentral gyri, bilateral orbitofrontal regions, and cerebellum, and increased FC from seeds in peri-opercular, subcortical (e.g., amygdala, hippocampus, and putamen), and mid-to-superior occipital regions (family-wise error rate,α<0.05). Connectivity from 23/93 (24.7%) seeds differed between groups. Methadone- and buprenorphine-exposed newborns showed disrupted regional FC compared to controls, but no FC differences between them.

Conclusions: In a large sample of antenatally opioid-exposed newborns, we report altered organization of brain functional networks, particularly in integrative sensorimotor-affective circuits.

产前阿片类药物暴露后新生儿脑连接中断。
背景:产前阿片类药物暴露不良神经发育结果的神经基础尚不清楚。非常有限的人类新生儿体内成像研究报告了边缘和奖励相关脑区域功能连接(FC)的破坏,但这些研究使用的样本很小,缺乏匹配的对照。我们的目的是比较产前阿片类药物暴露和未暴露的新生儿的大脑FC,以研究阿片类药物暴露对早期大脑发育的影响。方法:在四个中心使用3T MRI收集静息状态功能MRI数据,作为阿片类药物暴露婴儿前瞻性观察结果研究的一部分。我们使用基于种子的相关分析估计了93个脑区的FC。采用协变量调整和多重比较校正的体素线性回归来确定组间显著差异。基于阿片类型的FC差异也进行了研究。结果:我们进行了248次扫描(158次阿片类药物暴露/90次未暴露)。暴露新生儿的典型感觉运动和高阶静息状态网络图(MRI±sd时平均经后年龄42.80±1.9周,52M)与对照组(42.82±2.2,88;Dice指数>.9)相当。暴露在阿片类药物下的新生儿在双侧前、左中央后脑回、双侧眶额区和小脑显示来自种子的FC减少,而在眼周、皮质下(如杏仁核、海马和壳核)和枕中上部区域显示来自种子的FC增加(家庭误差率,α)。结论:在大量产前暴露在阿片类药物下的新生儿样本中,我们报告了大脑功能网络组织的改变,特别是在综合感觉运动-情感回路中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信