{"title":"Wearable technologies to predict and prevent and heart failure hospitalizations: a systematic review.","authors":"Francesca Noci, Angelo Capodici, Sabina Nuti, Claudio Passino, Michele Emdin, Alberto Giannoni","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart failure (HF) is a global pandemic and accounts for substantial morbidity and healthcare expenditure, largely due to frequent hospitalizations. While traditionally HF patients are followed with intermittent clinical assessments, wearable technologies offer continuous, real-time monitoring, potentially enabling earlier detection and tailored interventions to prevent hospitalization. This systematic review evaluates the impact of non-invasive wearable devices on hospitalizations in HF. Following PRISMA guidelines, literature searches were conducted in PubMed and Scopus using keywords related to HF, hospitalization, and wearable technology on 1 March 2024, and re-run on 3 December 2024. Studies assessing the link between wearable devices and HF-related hospitalization rates were included. Data extraction covered population characteristics, study design, type of device, and hospitalization rates. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and ROB-2 tools. Meta-analysis was attempted but not performed due to significant heterogeneity (<i>I</i>²>90%). From 2247 records, eight studies involving 1823 patients were finally analysed. Devices included ReDS, VitalPatch, ZOLL LifeVest, and ZOLL-HFMS, with follow-up ranging from 30 to 646 days. Wearable devices allowed prediction of HF hospitalization within 6.5-32 days in advance. Wearable-guided therapy compared to traditional assessment showed an 89% relative reduction at 30 days in a single-blind randomized-controlled trial, and 78% and 87% reductions in 30-day and 90-day hospitalization rates in observational studies. Although these data highlight the potential of wearable devices in HF management, future research should test predefined wearable-guided treatment algorithms on strong endpoints and address cost-effectiveness and data security in large randomized-controlled trials with longer follow-up. <b>Registration</b> This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024519282).</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"868-877"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a global pandemic and accounts for substantial morbidity and healthcare expenditure, largely due to frequent hospitalizations. While traditionally HF patients are followed with intermittent clinical assessments, wearable technologies offer continuous, real-time monitoring, potentially enabling earlier detection and tailored interventions to prevent hospitalization. This systematic review evaluates the impact of non-invasive wearable devices on hospitalizations in HF. Following PRISMA guidelines, literature searches were conducted in PubMed and Scopus using keywords related to HF, hospitalization, and wearable technology on 1 March 2024, and re-run on 3 December 2024. Studies assessing the link between wearable devices and HF-related hospitalization rates were included. Data extraction covered population characteristics, study design, type of device, and hospitalization rates. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and ROB-2 tools. Meta-analysis was attempted but not performed due to significant heterogeneity (I²>90%). From 2247 records, eight studies involving 1823 patients were finally analysed. Devices included ReDS, VitalPatch, ZOLL LifeVest, and ZOLL-HFMS, with follow-up ranging from 30 to 646 days. Wearable devices allowed prediction of HF hospitalization within 6.5-32 days in advance. Wearable-guided therapy compared to traditional assessment showed an 89% relative reduction at 30 days in a single-blind randomized-controlled trial, and 78% and 87% reductions in 30-day and 90-day hospitalization rates in observational studies. Although these data highlight the potential of wearable devices in HF management, future research should test predefined wearable-guided treatment algorithms on strong endpoints and address cost-effectiveness and data security in large randomized-controlled trials with longer follow-up. Registration This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024519282).