Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Versus Topiramate Versus Naltrexone/Bupropion in Individuals With Binge Eating Disorder: A Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Tamer Hodrob, Ibrahim Ismail, Alaaeddin Abusalameh, Celina R Andonie, Omar Ayesh, Hazem Ayesh
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Versus Topiramate Versus Naltrexone/Bupropion in Individuals With Binge Eating Disorder: A Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Tamer Hodrob, Ibrahim Ismail, Alaaeddin Abusalameh, Celina R Andonie, Omar Ayesh, Hazem Ayesh","doi":"10.1002/erv.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine, topiramate, and naltrexone/bupropion for treating binge eating disorder (BED) using network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central up to February 2025 for randomized controlled trials evaluating these medications versus placebo in adults with BED. Primary outcomes were changes in binge eating frequency and body weight; secondary outcomes included serious adverse events, discontinuation rates, and common side effects. A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve trials (n = 1988) met inclusion criteria. Both lisdexamfetamine (MD -1.61, 95% CI: -2.41 to -0.81) and topiramate (MD -1.63, 95% CI: -2.53 to -0.74) significantly reduced binge eating frequency versus placebo, with comparable efficacy. Topiramate produced the greatest weight loss (MD -5.5 kg), followed by lisdexamfetamine (-4.6 kg). Naltrexone/bupropion did not significantly reduce binge frequency (MD -2.07, 95% CI: -4.45 to 0.31). Lisdexamfetamine was associated with higher risks of dry mouth and gastrointestinal events. No significant increase in serious adverse events was observed for any medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Topiramate and lisdexamfetamine are effective for reducing binge episodes and weight in BED. Naltrexone/bupropion showed modest weight effects but lacked clear efficacy for binge reduction. These findings support topiramate and lisdexamfetamine as primary pharmacologic options for BED.</p>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.70035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine, topiramate, and naltrexone/bupropion for treating binge eating disorder (BED) using network meta-analysis.

Method: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central up to February 2025 for randomized controlled trials evaluating these medications versus placebo in adults with BED. Primary outcomes were changes in binge eating frequency and body weight; secondary outcomes included serious adverse events, discontinuation rates, and common side effects. A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was performed.

Results: Twelve trials (n = 1988) met inclusion criteria. Both lisdexamfetamine (MD -1.61, 95% CI: -2.41 to -0.81) and topiramate (MD -1.63, 95% CI: -2.53 to -0.74) significantly reduced binge eating frequency versus placebo, with comparable efficacy. Topiramate produced the greatest weight loss (MD -5.5 kg), followed by lisdexamfetamine (-4.6 kg). Naltrexone/bupropion did not significantly reduce binge frequency (MD -2.07, 95% CI: -4.45 to 0.31). Lisdexamfetamine was associated with higher risks of dry mouth and gastrointestinal events. No significant increase in serious adverse events was observed for any medication.

Conclusions: Topiramate and lisdexamfetamine are effective for reducing binge episodes and weight in BED. Naltrexone/bupropion showed modest weight effects but lacked clear efficacy for binge reduction. These findings support topiramate and lisdexamfetamine as primary pharmacologic options for BED.

利地胺非他明、托吡酯、纳曲酮/安非他酮对暴食症患者的疗效和安全性:一项网络荟萃分析
目的:采用网络meta分析比较利地胺非他明、托吡酯和纳曲酮/安非他酮治疗暴食症(BED)的疗效和安全性。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov和Cochrane Central,检索截至2025年2月的随机对照试验,评估这些药物与安慰剂在成人BED中的疗效。主要结局是暴食频率和体重的变化;次要结局包括严重不良事件、停药率和常见副作用。进行了频率随机效应网络元分析。结果:12项试验(n = 1988)符合纳入标准。与安慰剂相比,利地安非他明(MD -1.61, 95% CI: -2.41至-0.81)和托吡酯(MD -1.63, 95% CI: -2.53至-0.74)均显著降低暴食频率,疗效相当。托吡酯产生最大的体重减轻(MD -5.5 kg),其次是利地安非他明(-4.6 kg)。纳曲酮/安非他酮没有显著降低暴食频率(MD: -2.07, 95% CI: -4.45至0.31)。利地安非他明与口干和胃肠道事件的高风险相关。没有观察到任何药物的严重不良事件显著增加。结论:托吡酯和利地苯他明可有效减少BED患者暴食发作次数和体重。纳曲酮/安非他酮显示适度的体重影响,但缺乏明确的减少暴食的功效。这些发现支持托吡酯和利地塞米明作为BED的主要药物选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信