Developing and piloting an intervention to increase adolescent access to sexual and reproductive healthcare: a mixed-methods study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M K Miller, R Barral, J Noel-Macdonnell, K Goggin, C N Hays, A McNeill-Johnson, E A Hurley
{"title":"Developing and piloting an intervention to increase adolescent access to sexual and reproductive healthcare: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"M K Miller, R Barral, J Noel-Macdonnell, K Goggin, C N Hays, A McNeill-Johnson, E A Hurley","doi":"10.1093/her/cyaf036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This mixed-methods study describes the development and pilot testing of AccessKCTeen, an intervention to improve sexual and reproductive health (SRH) access for marginalized youth. Community discussions guided development of an intervention featuring SRH outreach events to disseminate information, share resources, and connect teens to care via telemedicine and mobile health clinics. During eight outreach events, we recruited adolescent participants for baseline assessments (demographics, event satisfaction, and trust in the medical profession) and one-month follow-up (trust and SRH utilization). We documented feedback on SRH resources (e.g. condoms), telemedicine, and mobile care with field notes. Among 96 participants (46% Black; 23% Hispanic; 23% gender minority; 50% sexual minority), most were 'very' (76%) or 'somewhat' (9%) satisfied with the event; 15% were 'neutral'. At baseline, trust was moderate (16.4 ± 2.7; scale range 5-25). Many accepted SRH items for future use. Field notes documented adolescent comments regarding telemedicine as safe, private, and convenient, and the mobile clinic as private and trustworthy. At follow-up, 20% obtained healthcare; trust was 17.2 ± 2.8. Our findings indicate that a community-integrated, multi-component intervention is acceptable to adolescents and warrants further evaluation of its impact on SRH outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48236,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Research","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyaf036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mixed-methods study describes the development and pilot testing of AccessKCTeen, an intervention to improve sexual and reproductive health (SRH) access for marginalized youth. Community discussions guided development of an intervention featuring SRH outreach events to disseminate information, share resources, and connect teens to care via telemedicine and mobile health clinics. During eight outreach events, we recruited adolescent participants for baseline assessments (demographics, event satisfaction, and trust in the medical profession) and one-month follow-up (trust and SRH utilization). We documented feedback on SRH resources (e.g. condoms), telemedicine, and mobile care with field notes. Among 96 participants (46% Black; 23% Hispanic; 23% gender minority; 50% sexual minority), most were 'very' (76%) or 'somewhat' (9%) satisfied with the event; 15% were 'neutral'. At baseline, trust was moderate (16.4 ± 2.7; scale range 5-25). Many accepted SRH items for future use. Field notes documented adolescent comments regarding telemedicine as safe, private, and convenient, and the mobile clinic as private and trustworthy. At follow-up, 20% obtained healthcare; trust was 17.2 ± 2.8. Our findings indicate that a community-integrated, multi-component intervention is acceptable to adolescents and warrants further evaluation of its impact on SRH outcomes.

制定和试行一项干预措施,以增加青少年获得性保健和生殖保健的机会:一项混合方法研究。
这项混合方法研究描述了AccessKCTeen的开发和试点测试,这是一项旨在改善边缘化青年获得性健康和生殖健康(SRH)的干预措施。社区讨论指导了以性健康和生殖健康外展活动为特色的干预措施的发展,以传播信息、共享资源,并通过远程医疗和移动保健诊所将青少年与护理联系起来。在八次外展活动中,我们招募了青少年参与者进行基线评估(人口统计学、事件满意度和对医疗专业的信任)和一个月的随访(信任和SRH利用)。我们记录了对性生殖健康资源(如避孕套)、远程医疗和移动护理的反馈。在96名参与者中(黑人占46%,西班牙裔占23%,性别少数群体占23%,性少数群体占50%),大多数人对活动“非常”(76%)或“有些”(9%)满意;15%的人持“中立”态度。基线时,信任度为中等(16.4±2.7;量表范围5-25)。许多人接受SRH项目供将来使用。现场记录记录了青少年对远程医疗安全、私密和方便的评价,以及移动诊所私密和值得信赖的评价。在随访中,20%的人获得了医疗保健;信任度为17.2±2.8。我们的研究结果表明,社区综合、多成分干预对青少年来说是可以接受的,值得进一步评估其对性健康和生殖健康结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Publishing original, refereed papers, Health Education Research deals with all the vital issues involved in health education and promotion worldwide - providing a valuable link between the health education research and practice communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信