The cost of dengue shock and septic shock in Vietnam: a patient-centred economic analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Angela McBride, Nguyen Van Hao, Phan Vinh Tho, Luong Thi Hue Tai, Nguyen Thanh Phong, Nguyen Thanh Ngoc, Nguyen Anh Huyen, Trinh Manh Hung, Martin J Llewelyn, Sophie Yacoub, Louise Thwaites, Hugo C Turner
{"title":"The cost of dengue shock and septic shock in Vietnam: a patient-centred economic analysis.","authors":"Angela McBride, Nguyen Van Hao, Phan Vinh Tho, Luong Thi Hue Tai, Nguyen Thanh Phong, Nguyen Thanh Ngoc, Nguyen Anh Huyen, Trinh Manh Hung, Martin J Llewelyn, Sophie Yacoub, Louise Thwaites, Hugo C Turner","doi":"10.1093/inthealth/ihaf105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dengue shock (DS) and septic shock (SS) are the most common infectious causes of shock in Vietnam. Little is known about the cost of an episode of DS or SS from the patient perspective. We aimed to describe the direct medical, non-medical and productivity costs associated with DS and SS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited adults with DS and SS to a prospective observational study at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, from 2019 to 2021. We collected hospital bills, insurance status and out of pocket payments, and conducted an economic questionnaire at discharge, 1, 3 and 6 mo later. We calculated the proportion incurring catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and catastrophic costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 127 adults with DS, of whom 118 survived, and 35 with SS, of whom 24 survived; 18.9% and 71.4% with DS and SS, respectively, incurred CHE. When non-medical and productivity costs were considered, the true cost of illness was 6.3 and 6.7 times higher than the hospital bill for DS and SS, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Productivity costs must be counted when assessing the cost of critical illness in low- and lower-middle income countries. It is vital that financial protection systems are extended to cover patients requiring high-cost critical care in Vietnam.</p>","PeriodicalId":49060,"journal":{"name":"International Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaf105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dengue shock (DS) and septic shock (SS) are the most common infectious causes of shock in Vietnam. Little is known about the cost of an episode of DS or SS from the patient perspective. We aimed to describe the direct medical, non-medical and productivity costs associated with DS and SS.

Methods: We recruited adults with DS and SS to a prospective observational study at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, from 2019 to 2021. We collected hospital bills, insurance status and out of pocket payments, and conducted an economic questionnaire at discharge, 1, 3 and 6 mo later. We calculated the proportion incurring catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and catastrophic costs.

Results: We recruited 127 adults with DS, of whom 118 survived, and 35 with SS, of whom 24 survived; 18.9% and 71.4% with DS and SS, respectively, incurred CHE. When non-medical and productivity costs were considered, the true cost of illness was 6.3 and 6.7 times higher than the hospital bill for DS and SS, respectively.

Conclusions: Productivity costs must be counted when assessing the cost of critical illness in low- and lower-middle income countries. It is vital that financial protection systems are extended to cover patients requiring high-cost critical care in Vietnam.

越南登革热休克和败血性休克的成本:以患者为中心的经济分析。
背景:登革热休克(DS)和脓毒性休克(SS)是越南最常见的感染性休克原因。从患者的角度来看,我们对退行性椎体滑移或退行性椎体滑移的成本知之甚少。我们的目的是描述与DS和SS相关的直接医疗、非医疗和生产力成本。方法:我们招募了患有DS和SS的成年人,于2019年至2021年在胡志明市热带病医院进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。我们收集医院账单、保险状况和自付费用,并在出院、1、3和6个月后进行经济问卷调查。我们计算了发生灾难性卫生支出(CHE)和灾难性成本的比例。结果:我们招募了127名成人DS患者,其中118人存活,35名SS患者,其中24人存活;DS和SS分别为18.9%和71.4%。如果考虑到非医疗成本和生产力成本,患病的真实成本分别是DS和SS住院费用的6.3倍和6.7倍。结论:在评估低收入和中低收入国家的危重疾病成本时,必须将生产力成本计算在内。至关重要的是,在越南,经济保护制度应扩大到涵盖需要高费用重症护理的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Health
International Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Health is an official journal of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It publishes original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of global health including the social and economic aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases, health systems research, policy and implementation, and the evaluation of disease control programmes and healthcare delivery solutions. It aims to stimulate scientific and policy debate and provide a forum for analysis and opinion sharing for individuals and organisations engaged in all areas of global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信