Bilal Irfan, Ibrahim Omeish, Abdulwhhab Abu Alamrain, Belal Aldabbour, Arham Ali, Yassar Arain, Abeerah Muhammad, Khansa Irfan, Mohamed Fawaz, Yousef Barakat, Ruba Musallam, Osaama Khan, Karim Fikry, Muhammad Hamza Shah, Mohammed Halimy, Izzeddin Lulu, Tamer Alkurd, Hadeel Obeid, Roberto Sirvent, James Smith
{"title":"The Political Determination of Gaza's Health System Destruction and Reconstruction and the Limitations of International Medical Deployments.","authors":"Bilal Irfan, Ibrahim Omeish, Abdulwhhab Abu Alamrain, Belal Aldabbour, Arham Ali, Yassar Arain, Abeerah Muhammad, Khansa Irfan, Mohamed Fawaz, Yousef Barakat, Ruba Musallam, Osaama Khan, Karim Fikry, Muhammad Hamza Shah, Mohammed Halimy, Izzeddin Lulu, Tamer Alkurd, Hadeel Obeid, Roberto Sirvent, James Smith","doi":"10.1002/hpm.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gaza's health system has been devastated by a confluence of political determinants that long predated the 2023-25 Israeli military assault and were dramatically intensified during it. Using historical, political economy, ethical, and health systems lenses, this article argues that settler colonialism, military occupation, and a protracted blockade created chronic shortages, workforce erosion, and institutional fragility, leaving services acutely vulnerable to targeted destruction of facilities and personnel. We examine the role and limitations of international medical deployments and field hospitals, which provided lifesaving care but operated under stringent access controls, supply interdictions, and security risks. Short rotations, poor continuity of care, and donor restrictions that discourage engagement with local authorities contributed to parallel systems, fragmentation, and dependency. We then identify four intersecting barriers to reconstruction: ongoing blockade and humanitarian access denials; lack of protection and accountability for attacks on health; governance fragmentation and the sidelining of Palestinian leadership; and donor fatigue amid politicised aid. The article proposes a justice-centred pathway for recovery that prioritises accountability and reparations, an end to the blockade and occupation, inclusive Palestinian-led governance, alignment of aid with national plans, avoidance of parallel structures through early transition to local ownership, workforce stabilisation, and long-term partnerships. Without these political preconditions, reconstruction efforts will remain fragile and inequitable.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gaza's health system has been devastated by a confluence of political determinants that long predated the 2023-25 Israeli military assault and were dramatically intensified during it. Using historical, political economy, ethical, and health systems lenses, this article argues that settler colonialism, military occupation, and a protracted blockade created chronic shortages, workforce erosion, and institutional fragility, leaving services acutely vulnerable to targeted destruction of facilities and personnel. We examine the role and limitations of international medical deployments and field hospitals, which provided lifesaving care but operated under stringent access controls, supply interdictions, and security risks. Short rotations, poor continuity of care, and donor restrictions that discourage engagement with local authorities contributed to parallel systems, fragmentation, and dependency. We then identify four intersecting barriers to reconstruction: ongoing blockade and humanitarian access denials; lack of protection and accountability for attacks on health; governance fragmentation and the sidelining of Palestinian leadership; and donor fatigue amid politicised aid. The article proposes a justice-centred pathway for recovery that prioritises accountability and reparations, an end to the blockade and occupation, inclusive Palestinian-led governance, alignment of aid with national plans, avoidance of parallel structures through early transition to local ownership, workforce stabilisation, and long-term partnerships. Without these political preconditions, reconstruction efforts will remain fragile and inequitable.
期刊介绍:
Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.