Radiomics integrated with machine and deep learning analysis of T2-weighted and arterial-phase T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for non-invasive detection of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Roberta Fusco, Vincenza Granata, Mauro Mattace Raso, Igino Simonetti, Paolo Vallone, Davide Pupo, Filippo Tovecci, Maria Assunta Daniela Iasevoli, Francesca Maio, Paola Gargiulo, Giuditta Giannotti, Paolo Pariante, Saverio Simonelli, Gerardo Ferrara, Claudio Siani, Raimondo Di Giacomo, Sergio Venanzio Setola, Antonella Petrillo
{"title":"Radiomics integrated with machine and deep learning analysis of T2-weighted and arterial-phase T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for non-invasive detection of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.","authors":"Roberta Fusco, Vincenza Granata, Mauro Mattace Raso, Igino Simonetti, Paolo Vallone, Davide Pupo, Filippo Tovecci, Maria Assunta Daniela Iasevoli, Francesca Maio, Paola Gargiulo, Giuditta Giannotti, Paolo Pariante, Saverio Simonelli, Gerardo Ferrara, Claudio Siani, Raimondo Di Giacomo, Sergio Venanzio Setola, Antonella Petrillo","doi":"10.1007/s11547-025-02090-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the diagnostic performance of radiomic features extracted from T2-weighted and arterial-phase T1-weighted MRI sequences using univariate, machine and deep learning analysis and to assess their effectiveness in predicting axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed MRI data from 100 breast cancer patients, comprising 52 metastatic and 103 non-metastatic lymph nodes. Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted and subtracted arterial-phase T1-weighted images. Feature normalization and selection were performed. Various machine learning classifiers, including logistic regression, gradient boosting, random forest, and neural networks, were trained and evaluated. Diagnostic performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T2-weighted imaging provided strong performance in multivariate modeling, with the neural network achieving the highest AUC (0.978) and accuracy (91.1%), showing statistically significant differences over models. The stepwise logistic regression model also showed competitive results (AUC = 0.796; accuracy = 73.3%). In contrast, arterial-phase T1-weighted imaging features performed better when analyzed individually, with the best univariate AUC reaching 0.787. When multivariate modeling was applied to arterial-phase features, the best-performing logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.853 and accuracy of 77.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomic analysis of T2-weighted MRI, particularly through deep learning models like neural networks, demonstrated the highest overall diagnostic performance for predicting metastatic ALNs. In contrast, arterial-phase T1-weighted features showed better results in univariate analysis. These findings support the integration of radiomic features, especially from T2-weighted sequences, into multivariate models to enhance noninvasive preoperative assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02090-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of radiomic features extracted from T2-weighted and arterial-phase T1-weighted MRI sequences using univariate, machine and deep learning analysis and to assess their effectiveness in predicting axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in breast cancer patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed MRI data from 100 breast cancer patients, comprising 52 metastatic and 103 non-metastatic lymph nodes. Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted and subtracted arterial-phase T1-weighted images. Feature normalization and selection were performed. Various machine learning classifiers, including logistic regression, gradient boosting, random forest, and neural networks, were trained and evaluated. Diagnostic performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Results: T2-weighted imaging provided strong performance in multivariate modeling, with the neural network achieving the highest AUC (0.978) and accuracy (91.1%), showing statistically significant differences over models. The stepwise logistic regression model also showed competitive results (AUC = 0.796; accuracy = 73.3%). In contrast, arterial-phase T1-weighted imaging features performed better when analyzed individually, with the best univariate AUC reaching 0.787. When multivariate modeling was applied to arterial-phase features, the best-performing logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.853 and accuracy of 77.8%.

Conclusion: Radiomic analysis of T2-weighted MRI, particularly through deep learning models like neural networks, demonstrated the highest overall diagnostic performance for predicting metastatic ALNs. In contrast, arterial-phase T1-weighted features showed better results in univariate analysis. These findings support the integration of radiomic features, especially from T2-weighted sequences, into multivariate models to enhance noninvasive preoperative assessment.

放射组学结合机器和深度学习分析t2期和动脉期t1期磁共振成像对乳腺癌转移性腋窝淋巴结的无创检测。
目的:通过单变量分析、机器分析和深度学习分析,比较从t2加权和动脉t1加权MRI序列中提取的放射学特征的诊断性能,并评估其预测乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结(ALN)转移的有效性。方法:回顾性分析100例乳腺癌患者的MRI资料,其中包括52例转移性淋巴结和103例非转移性淋巴结。从t2加权和减去的动脉期t1加权图像中提取放射学特征。进行特征归一化和特征选择。各种机器学习分类器,包括逻辑回归、梯度增强、随机森林和神经网络,都进行了训练和评估。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性和准确性等指标评估诊断效果。结果:t2加权成像在多变量建模中表现较好,神经网络的AUC(0.978)和准确率(91.1%)最高,各模型间差异有统计学意义。逐步逻辑回归模型也显示出竞争结果(AUC = 0.796,准确率= 73.3%)。相比之下,动脉期t1加权成像特征在单独分析时表现更好,最佳单变量AUC达到0.787。将多变量建模应用于动脉期特征时,表现最好的logistic回归模型AUC为0.853,准确率为77.8%。结论:t2加权MRI放射组学分析,特别是通过神经网络等深度学习模型,在预测转移性aln方面表现出最高的总体诊断性能。相比之下,动脉期t1加权特征在单变量分析中显示更好的结果。这些发现支持将放射学特征(尤其是t2加权序列)整合到多变量模型中,以增强无创术前评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信