Do wrist anatomical differences predispose to scapholunate ligament injury? A case-control radiographic study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ebubekir Eravsar, Ali Gulec, Fatih Bilal Sezer, Ibrahim Ozkan, Ali Özdemir, Mehmet Ali Acar
{"title":"Do wrist anatomical differences predispose to scapholunate ligament injury? A case-control radiographic study.","authors":"Ebubekir Eravsar, Ali Gulec, Fatih Bilal Sezer, Ibrahim Ozkan, Ali Özdemir, Mehmet Ali Acar","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-06296-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injury is the most common cause of carpal instability and may lead to scapholunate advanced collapse if untreated. While several anatomical wrist variations have been implicated in other wrist pathologies, limited studies have explored their role in SLIL injuries. This study aimed to compare specific anatomical parameters on wrist radiographs between patients with arthroscopically confirmed SLIL injuries and healthy individuals to identify potential anatomical predispositions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed bilateral wrist radiographs of 87 patients who underwent arthroscopic dorsal capsulodesis for SLIL injuries between 2010 and 2023. A control group of 87 asymptomatic individuals with normal wrist radiographs was also included. Standardized anteroposterior and lateral wrist X-rays were collaboratively evaluated by three orthopedic surgeons. Parameters measured included radial inclination (RI), lunate fossa inclination (LFI), ulnar variance (UV), lunate tilting angle (LTA), lunate uncovering index (LUCI), carpal height ratio (CHR), palmar tilting angle (PTA), and lunate morphology. Group comparisons were performed, and a multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted using variables found to be significant in univariate analysis to identify independent anatomical predictors of SLIL injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the SLIL-injured patient group and the control group in terms of gender, age, and side (p > 0.05). RI (p < 0.001) and LFI (p = 0.016) were significantly lower, while LTA (p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the SLIL-injured patient group. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that lower RI (OR: 0.853, 95% CI: 0.769-0.946; p = 0.003) and higher LTA (OR: 1.126, 95% CI: 1.052-1.204; p = 0.001) were independently associated with SLIL injury. LFI did not remain significant in the final model. No significant differences were observed in UV, LUCI, PTA, CHR, or lunate type between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low RI and increased LTA may represent anatomical risk factors for SLIL injury. Other parameters were not associated with an increased risk of injury. This study was not designed to establish a radiological diagnosis of SLIL injury; rather, it demonstrates that SLIL injuries may be influenced by individual anatomical variations. Further large scale studies are needed to validate these findings and to better understand the anatomical contributions to SLIL injury susceptibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"823"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06296-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injury is the most common cause of carpal instability and may lead to scapholunate advanced collapse if untreated. While several anatomical wrist variations have been implicated in other wrist pathologies, limited studies have explored their role in SLIL injuries. This study aimed to compare specific anatomical parameters on wrist radiographs between patients with arthroscopically confirmed SLIL injuries and healthy individuals to identify potential anatomical predispositions.

Methods: This study analyzed bilateral wrist radiographs of 87 patients who underwent arthroscopic dorsal capsulodesis for SLIL injuries between 2010 and 2023. A control group of 87 asymptomatic individuals with normal wrist radiographs was also included. Standardized anteroposterior and lateral wrist X-rays were collaboratively evaluated by three orthopedic surgeons. Parameters measured included radial inclination (RI), lunate fossa inclination (LFI), ulnar variance (UV), lunate tilting angle (LTA), lunate uncovering index (LUCI), carpal height ratio (CHR), palmar tilting angle (PTA), and lunate morphology. Group comparisons were performed, and a multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted using variables found to be significant in univariate analysis to identify independent anatomical predictors of SLIL injury.

Results: There were no significant differences between the SLIL-injured patient group and the control group in terms of gender, age, and side (p > 0.05). RI (p < 0.001) and LFI (p = 0.016) were significantly lower, while LTA (p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the SLIL-injured patient group. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that lower RI (OR: 0.853, 95% CI: 0.769-0.946; p = 0.003) and higher LTA (OR: 1.126, 95% CI: 1.052-1.204; p = 0.001) were independently associated with SLIL injury. LFI did not remain significant in the final model. No significant differences were observed in UV, LUCI, PTA, CHR, or lunate type between groups.

Conclusion: Low RI and increased LTA may represent anatomical risk factors for SLIL injury. Other parameters were not associated with an increased risk of injury. This study was not designed to establish a radiological diagnosis of SLIL injury; rather, it demonstrates that SLIL injuries may be influenced by individual anatomical variations. Further large scale studies are needed to validate these findings and to better understand the anatomical contributions to SLIL injury susceptibility.

腕部解剖差异易导致舟月骨韧带损伤吗?病例对照放射学研究。
目的:舟月骨骨间韧带(SLIL)损伤是腕关节不稳定的最常见原因,如果不治疗可能导致舟月骨晚期塌陷。虽然一些腕部解剖变异与其他腕部病变有关,但有限的研究探讨了它们在SLIL损伤中的作用。本研究旨在比较关节镜下确认的SLIL损伤患者和健康个体腕部x线片上的特定解剖参数,以确定潜在的解剖倾向。方法:本研究分析了2010年至2023年间接受关节镜下背囊置换术治疗sll损伤的87例患者的双侧腕关节x线片。对照组为87名无症状且腕部x线片正常的患者。标准化的腕关节正位和侧位x光片由三位骨科医生共同评估。测量参数包括桡侧倾角(RI)、月骨窝倾角(LFI)、尺侧方差(UV)、月骨倾斜角(LTA)、月骨显露指数(LUCI)、腕高比(CHR)、掌侧倾斜角(PTA)和月骨形态。进行组间比较,并使用在单变量分析中发现显著的变量进行多元逻辑回归分析,以确定SLIL损伤的独立解剖学预测因素。结果:slil损伤患者组与对照组在性别、年龄、侧位上差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:低RI和LTA升高可能是SLIL损伤的解剖学危险因素。其他参数与损伤风险增加无关。本研究的目的不是建立SLIL损伤的影像学诊断;相反,它表明SLIL损伤可能受到个体解剖变异的影响。需要进一步的大规模研究来验证这些发现,并更好地了解sll损伤易感性的解剖学贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信