Persistent Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of One-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Andrew Bertagna E, Frederic Van der Cruyssen, Michael Miloro
{"title":"Persistent Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of One-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors.","authors":"Andrew Bertagna E, Frederic Van der Cruyssen, Michael Miloro","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) is widely performed for mandibular repositioning; however, inferior alveolar nerve injury may result in persistent neurosensory disturbance (NSD) that affects quality of life. The true 1-year incidence and associated risk factors remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study purpose was to estimate the 1-year incidence of persistent NSD after SSO and to evaluate risk factors.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed and Embase (1998 to February 2025). Eligible human studies (randomized, prospective, retrospective) reporting NSD outcomes after SSO and possible risk factors in English language were included.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a minimum follow-up of 3 months, reporting NSD incidence and potential predictors, were included. Nonhuman studies, case reports, and studies with alternative osteotomy techniques or incomplete NSD assessment were excluded. Study selection was performed by 2 independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Following PRISMA, we extracted study characteristics, variable definitions, NSD assessment methods, and 1-year outcomes. \"Persistent NSD\" was defined as any NSD reported or assessed at 12 months postoperatively. Random- and fixed-effects models estimated pooled 1-year incidence; heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>) and small-study effects were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample comprised 47 studies (5,406 patients). The pooled 1-year incidence of persistent NSD was 21% (95% CI, 13%-32%). Older age (statistically significant in 5 out of 9 studies), greater mandibular advancement (significant in 2 out of 2 studies), and intraoperative nerve exposure/manipulation (significant in 2 out of 3 studies) were statistically significantly associated with a higher risk of persistent NSD across contributing adequately powered studies. Across the available evidence, persistent NSD was not significantly associated with sex (8/9 studies), skeletal class (4/5), fixation method (1/2), third molar presence (1/1), or concomitant genioplasty (3/5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>NSD following SSO persists in 1 in 5 patients at 1 year. Larger mandibular advancements and nerve manipulation increase persistent NSD risk. Standardized NSD assessments and adequately powered studies are essential to refine risk stratification and optimize surgical techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2025.08.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) is widely performed for mandibular repositioning; however, inferior alveolar nerve injury may result in persistent neurosensory disturbance (NSD) that affects quality of life. The true 1-year incidence and associated risk factors remain uncertain.

Purpose: The study purpose was to estimate the 1-year incidence of persistent NSD after SSO and to evaluate risk factors.

Data sources: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase (1998 to February 2025). Eligible human studies (randomized, prospective, retrospective) reporting NSD outcomes after SSO and possible risk factors in English language were included.

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a minimum follow-up of 3 months, reporting NSD incidence and potential predictors, were included. Nonhuman studies, case reports, and studies with alternative osteotomy techniques or incomplete NSD assessment were excluded. Study selection was performed by 2 independent reviewers.

Data extraction and synthesis: Following PRISMA, we extracted study characteristics, variable definitions, NSD assessment methods, and 1-year outcomes. "Persistent NSD" was defined as any NSD reported or assessed at 12 months postoperatively. Random- and fixed-effects models estimated pooled 1-year incidence; heterogeneity (I2) and small-study effects were assessed.

Results: The final sample comprised 47 studies (5,406 patients). The pooled 1-year incidence of persistent NSD was 21% (95% CI, 13%-32%). Older age (statistically significant in 5 out of 9 studies), greater mandibular advancement (significant in 2 out of 2 studies), and intraoperative nerve exposure/manipulation (significant in 2 out of 3 studies) were statistically significantly associated with a higher risk of persistent NSD across contributing adequately powered studies. Across the available evidence, persistent NSD was not significantly associated with sex (8/9 studies), skeletal class (4/5), fixation method (1/2), third molar presence (1/1), or concomitant genioplasty (3/5).

Conclusions and relevance: NSD following SSO persists in 1 in 5 patients at 1 year. Larger mandibular advancements and nerve manipulation increase persistent NSD risk. Standardized NSD assessments and adequately powered studies are essential to refine risk stratification and optimize surgical techniques.

矢状面劈开截骨术后持续性神经感觉障碍:1年预后和危险因素的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:矢状面劈开截骨术(SSO)被广泛应用于下颌复位;然而,下肺泡神经损伤可导致持续性神经感觉障碍(NSD),影响生活质量。真实的1年发病率和相关危险因素仍不确定。目的:研究目的是估计单点登录后1年持续NSD的发生率,并评估危险因素。数据来源:我们系统地检索了PubMed和Embase(1998 - 2025年2月)。纳入了符合条件的人类研究(随机、前瞻性、回顾性),报告了单点登录后的NSD结果和英语语言中可能的危险因素。研究选择:纳入随机对照试验、前瞻性和回顾性队列研究,至少随访3个月,报告NSD发病率和潜在预测因素。非人类研究、病例报告、替代截骨技术或不完整NSD评估的研究被排除在外。研究选择由2名独立审稿人进行。数据提取和综合:根据PRISMA,我们提取了研究特征、变量定义、NSD评估方法和1年结果。“持续性NSD”定义为术后12个月报告或评估的任何NSD。随机效应和固定效应模型估计了汇总的1年发病率;评估异质性(I2)和小研究效应。结果:最终样本包括47项研究(5406例患者)。1年持续NSD的总发生率为21% (95% CI, 13%-32%)。年龄较大(9项研究中有5项具有统计学意义)、下颌前移较大(2项研究中有2项具有统计学意义)和术中神经暴露/操作(3项研究中有2项具有统计学意义)与持续性NSD的高风险具有统计学意义。在现有的证据中,持续性NSD与性别(8/9)、骨骼类别(4/5)、固定方法(1/2)、第三磨牙存在(1/1)或伴随的生殖器成形术(3/5)无关。结论和相关性:1 / 5的患者在1年内仍存在SSO后的NSD。较大的下颌骨进展和神经操作增加了持续性NSD的风险。标准化的NSD评估和充分有力的研究对于完善风险分层和优化手术技术至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: This monthly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments and diagnostic equipment and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信