Effectiveness and safety of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Che-Sheng Chu, Hsin-An Chang, Yu-Te Lin, Hsiu-Chu Shen, Chih-Kuang Liang, Ying-Hsin Hsu, Chih-Chuan Pan, Hsin-Ya Kuo, Wei-Zhe Liang, Shiou-Lan Chen, Cheng-Sheng Chen
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial.","authors":"Che-Sheng Chu, Hsin-An Chang, Yu-Te Lin, Hsiu-Chu Shen, Chih-Kuang Liang, Ying-Hsin Hsu, Chih-Chuan Pan, Hsin-Ya Kuo, Wei-Zhe Liang, Shiou-Lan Chen, Cheng-Sheng Chen","doi":"10.1177/13872877251376547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHigh-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has shown potential for improving cognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).ObjectiveTo evaluate whether HD-tDCS enhances cognitive function in individuals with MCI.MethodsThis was a triple-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study. The anodal electrode was placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and surrounded by four cathode electrodes (2 mA for 25 min, daily for 10 sessions). Tests were performed at baseline, after 2-week stimulation, at 1 month, and at 3 months. The primary outcome was global cognition measured by Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument and secondary outcomes included memory, language, executive function, and attention tests. Group differences were analyzed using linear mixed model (LMM).ResultsFifty patients with MCI were randomized to the sham (n = 25) and HD-tDCS groups (n = 25). No significant differences were observed between the HD-tDCS and sham groups in global cognition or other neuropsychological measures. However, subgroup analysis revealed a significant three-way interaction between apolipoprotein E (<i>APOE</i>) allele 4 status, tDCS condition, and time. <i>APOE4</i>-positive patients receiving HD-tDCS showed significantly greater improvement in language function, as measured by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition vocabulary, compared to <i>APOE4</i>-negative patients in the sham group (p = 0.028). Adverse effects were mild and comparable between groups.ConclusionsHD-tDCS did not enhance global cognition in MCI patients overall. Preliminary findings demonstrated a potential language benefit was observed in <i>APOE4</i>-postitive individuals. These exploratory findings warrant further investigation in larger, biomarker-stratified studies.<b>Trial registration</b>The study was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov under NCT04121156.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251376547"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251376547","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundHigh-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has shown potential for improving cognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).ObjectiveTo evaluate whether HD-tDCS enhances cognitive function in individuals with MCI.MethodsThis was a triple-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study. The anodal electrode was placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and surrounded by four cathode electrodes (2 mA for 25 min, daily for 10 sessions). Tests were performed at baseline, after 2-week stimulation, at 1 month, and at 3 months. The primary outcome was global cognition measured by Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument and secondary outcomes included memory, language, executive function, and attention tests. Group differences were analyzed using linear mixed model (LMM).ResultsFifty patients with MCI were randomized to the sham (n = 25) and HD-tDCS groups (n = 25). No significant differences were observed between the HD-tDCS and sham groups in global cognition or other neuropsychological measures. However, subgroup analysis revealed a significant three-way interaction between apolipoprotein E (APOE) allele 4 status, tDCS condition, and time. APOE4-positive patients receiving HD-tDCS showed significantly greater improvement in language function, as measured by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition vocabulary, compared to APOE4-negative patients in the sham group (p = 0.028). Adverse effects were mild and comparable between groups.ConclusionsHD-tDCS did not enhance global cognition in MCI patients overall. Preliminary findings demonstrated a potential language benefit was observed in APOE4-postitive individuals. These exploratory findings warrant further investigation in larger, biomarker-stratified studies.Trial registrationThe study was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov under NCT04121156.

高清晰度经颅直流电刺激治疗轻度认知障碍患者的有效性和安全性:一项随机、三盲、假对照试验
高清晰度经颅直流电刺激(HD-tDCS)是一种非侵入性脑刺激技术,已显示出改善轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者认知能力的潜力。目的评价HD-tDCS是否能增强轻度认知损伤患者的认知功能。方法:这是一项三盲、随机、假对照研究。阳极电极置于左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)上,周围有4个阴极电极(2 mA,每天25分钟,共10次)。分别在基线、刺激2周后、1个月和3个月时进行测试。主要结果是通过认知能力筛选仪器测量的整体认知,次要结果包括记忆、语言、执行功能和注意力测试。采用线性混合模型(LMM)分析组间差异。结果50例MCI患者随机分为假手术组(n = 25)和HD-tDCS组(n = 25)。在整体认知或其他神经心理学测量中,HD-tDCS组与假手术组之间没有显著差异。然而,亚组分析显示载脂蛋白E (APOE)等位基因4状态、tDCS状况和时间之间存在显著的三方相互作用。采用韦氏成人智力量表第四版词汇量测量,apoe4阳性接受HD-tDCS的患者与apoe4阴性假手术组相比,语言功能的改善明显更大(p = 0.028)。两组间不良反应轻微且具有可比性。结论shd - tdcs对MCI患者整体认知能力无增强作用。初步研究结果表明,apoe4阳性个体具有潜在的语言优势。这些探索性的发现值得在更大的生物标志物分层研究中进一步调查。试验注册该研究在ClinicalTrial.gov注册,编号NCT04121156。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信