Neuroanatomical normative modelling in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: higher heterogeneity in the behavioural variant.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Srijan Konwar, Nikolett Hunyadvari, Annalena Venneri, James H Cole, Martina Bocchetta
{"title":"Neuroanatomical normative modelling in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: higher heterogeneity in the behavioural variant.","authors":"Srijan Konwar, Nikolett Hunyadvari, Annalena Venneri, James H Cole, Martina Bocchetta","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13378-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) includes heterogenous diseases: behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasias (PPA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS). We applied neuroanatomical normative modelling to quantify individual atrophy patterns and heterogeneity within and between FTLD forms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 160 participants across FTLDNI and 4RTNI studies: controls (n = 15), bvFTD (n = 22), nfvPPA (n = 14), svPPA (n = 21), CBS (n = 43) and PSP (n = 45). Using cortical thickness and subcortical volumes from 3T MRIs, we applied normative modelling with a large healthy reference dataset (n = 58,836), further accounting for age, sex, and scanner. Outlier regions (z < - 1.96) were used to compute total outlier counts (tOC) and Hamming distances, capturing individual atrophy patterns and inter-subject dissimilarity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>bvFTD, svPPA, CBS and PSP showed significantly higher cortical tOC than controls, with all groups showing higher subcortical tOC than controls, especially svPPA and PSP. bvFTD, svPPA, CBS and PSP had significantly higher cortical Hamming distance scores than controls, with higher scores in bvFTD and svPPA than nfvPPA and PSP. svPPA and PSP had significantly higher subcortical scores than controls and CBS. Greater disease severity (measured using the Clinical Dementia Rating-CDR for PSP and CBS, and the CDR® plus NACC-FTLD global scores for FTD variants) was associated with increased tOC and dissimilarity, highlighting the link between clinical progression and neuroanatomical heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pronounced heterogeneity within and between FTLD subtypes (particularly in bvFTD) increases with disease progression and may reflect distinct underlying pathologies. This supports the development of subtype-specific biomarkers and emphasize the need for personalized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 10","pages":"642"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13378-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) includes heterogenous diseases: behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasias (PPA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS). We applied neuroanatomical normative modelling to quantify individual atrophy patterns and heterogeneity within and between FTLD forms.

Methods: We included 160 participants across FTLDNI and 4RTNI studies: controls (n = 15), bvFTD (n = 22), nfvPPA (n = 14), svPPA (n = 21), CBS (n = 43) and PSP (n = 45). Using cortical thickness and subcortical volumes from 3T MRIs, we applied normative modelling with a large healthy reference dataset (n = 58,836), further accounting for age, sex, and scanner. Outlier regions (z < - 1.96) were used to compute total outlier counts (tOC) and Hamming distances, capturing individual atrophy patterns and inter-subject dissimilarity.

Results: bvFTD, svPPA, CBS and PSP showed significantly higher cortical tOC than controls, with all groups showing higher subcortical tOC than controls, especially svPPA and PSP. bvFTD, svPPA, CBS and PSP had significantly higher cortical Hamming distance scores than controls, with higher scores in bvFTD and svPPA than nfvPPA and PSP. svPPA and PSP had significantly higher subcortical scores than controls and CBS. Greater disease severity (measured using the Clinical Dementia Rating-CDR for PSP and CBS, and the CDR® plus NACC-FTLD global scores for FTD variants) was associated with increased tOC and dissimilarity, highlighting the link between clinical progression and neuroanatomical heterogeneity.

Conclusions: The pronounced heterogeneity within and between FTLD subtypes (particularly in bvFTD) increases with disease progression and may reflect distinct underlying pathologies. This supports the development of subtype-specific biomarkers and emphasize the need for personalized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

额颞叶变性的神经解剖学规范模型:行为变异的更高异质性。
简介:额颞叶变性(FTLD)包括异质性疾病:行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)、原发性进行性失语(PPA)、进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)和皮质基底综合征(CBS)。我们应用神经解剖学规范模型来量化个体萎缩模式和FTLD形式内部和之间的异质性。方法:我们纳入了160名FTLDNI和4RTNI研究的参与者:对照组(n = 15), bvFTD (n = 22), nfvPPA (n = 14), svPPA (n = 21), CBS (n = 43)和PSP (n = 45)。利用3T核磁共振成像的皮质厚度和皮质下体积,我们对一个大型健康参考数据集(n = 58,836)应用了规范模型,进一步考虑了年龄、性别和扫描仪的影响。结果:bvFTD、svPPA、CBS和PSP组的皮质tOC均显著高于对照组,且各组的皮质下tOC均显著高于对照组,其中svPPA和PSP组的tOC均显著高于对照组。bvFTD、svPPA、CBS和PSP的皮层汉明距离得分显著高于对照组,且bvFTD和svPPA得分高于nfvPPA和PSP。svPPA和PSP的皮质下评分明显高于对照组和CBS。更严重的疾病严重程度(使用PSP和CBS的临床痴呆评分-CDR以及FTD变体的CDR®加NACC-FTLD整体评分来测量)与tOC和差异性增加相关,突出了临床进展与神经解剖学异质性之间的联系。结论:FTLD亚型(特别是bvFTD)内部和之间明显的异质性随着疾病进展而增加,可能反映了不同的潜在病理。这支持了亚型特异性生物标志物的发展,并强调了个性化诊断和治疗策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信