Retrospective evaluation of a funnel-shaped mesh for the prevention of parastomal hernias in patients with permanent end colostomy.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03481-x
Francesco Brucchi, Maria Rennis, Pietro Achilli, Lorenzo Morini, Pietro Carnevali, Matteo Origi, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Giovanni Ferrari
{"title":"Retrospective evaluation of a funnel-shaped mesh for the prevention of parastomal hernias in patients with permanent end colostomy.","authors":"Francesco Brucchi, Maria Rennis, Pietro Achilli, Lorenzo Morini, Pietro Carnevali, Matteo Origi, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Giovanni Ferrari","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03481-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common long-term complication after abdominoperineal resection (APR) with permanent end colostomy. Although prophylactic mesh placement has been suggested to reduce the rate of PSH, the optimal mesh type and surgical technique remain unclear. Recently, three-dimensional funnel-shaped meshes have been introduced to stabilize the bowel loop and minimize stoma-related mechanical stress, potentially reducing the incidence of PSH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study, reported in accordance with STROBE guidelines, included consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic permanent end colostomy (PEC) between 2011 and 2019 at a single institution. Patients were assigned to either a group without mesh or a group that received prophylactic intraperitoneal funnel-shaped mesh. The primary endpoint was radiologically confirmed PSH incidence. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess differences in cumulative PSH risk over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were included (mesh group: 37; no-mesh group: 38), with a median follow-up of 46 and 43 months, respectively. The mesh group had a lower, but not statistically significant, absolute incidence of PSH (21.6% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.094). Importantly, the Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly lower cumulative incidence of PSH in the mesh group over time (p= 0.033). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conusions: </strong>Prophylactic placement of a funnel-shaped mesh during PEC was associated with a reduced cumulative incidence of PSH over long-term followup without increasing surgical morbidity. These results underline the potential benefit of funnel-shaped meshes in PSH prevention and highlight the need for prospective randomized studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03481-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common long-term complication after abdominoperineal resection (APR) with permanent end colostomy. Although prophylactic mesh placement has been suggested to reduce the rate of PSH, the optimal mesh type and surgical technique remain unclear. Recently, three-dimensional funnel-shaped meshes have been introduced to stabilize the bowel loop and minimize stoma-related mechanical stress, potentially reducing the incidence of PSH.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study, reported in accordance with STROBE guidelines, included consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic permanent end colostomy (PEC) between 2011 and 2019 at a single institution. Patients were assigned to either a group without mesh or a group that received prophylactic intraperitoneal funnel-shaped mesh. The primary endpoint was radiologically confirmed PSH incidence. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess differences in cumulative PSH risk over time.

Results: Seventy-five patients were included (mesh group: 37; no-mesh group: 38), with a median follow-up of 46 and 43 months, respectively. The mesh group had a lower, but not statistically significant, absolute incidence of PSH (21.6% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.094). Importantly, the Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly lower cumulative incidence of PSH in the mesh group over time (p= 0.033). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the groups.

Conusions: Prophylactic placement of a funnel-shaped mesh during PEC was associated with a reduced cumulative incidence of PSH over long-term followup without increasing surgical morbidity. These results underline the potential benefit of funnel-shaped meshes in PSH prevention and highlight the need for prospective randomized studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

漏斗形补片预防永久性末端结肠造口患者造口旁疝的回顾性评价。
背景:造口旁疝(PSH)是腹会阴切除术(APR)合并永久性末端结肠造口术后最常见的长期并发症。虽然预防性补片放置已被建议降低PSH的发生率,但最佳补片类型和手术技术仍不清楚。最近,三维漏斗状网状物被用于稳定肠袢,并将与造口相关的机械应力降至最低,从而有可能降低PSH的发病率。方法:本回顾性队列研究根据STROBE指南报道,纳入2011年至2019年在单一机构连续接受选择性腹腔镜永久性末端结肠造口术(PEC)的患者。患者被分为无补片组和接受预防性漏斗形腹腔补片组。主要终点是放射学证实的PSH发病率。Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox回归用于评估随时间累积PSH风险的差异。结果:纳入75例患者(补片组37例,无补片组38例),中位随访时间分别为46个月和43个月。补片组PSH的绝对发生率较低,但无统计学意义(21.6%比39.5%,p = 0.094)。重要的是,Kaplan-Meier分析显示,随着时间的推移,补片组PSH的累积发病率显著降低(p= 0.033)。两组间术后并发症发生率比较。结论:在PEC期间预防性放置漏斗状网状物与长期随访中PSH的累积发病率降低有关,而不会增加手术发病率。这些结果强调了漏斗状网在预防PSH方面的潜在益处,并强调了前瞻性随机研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信