Long lives, poor health? A comprehensive review of the evidence among international migrants.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Matthew Wallace, Courtney Franklin, Joseph Harrison
{"title":"Long lives, poor health? A comprehensive review of the evidence among international migrants.","authors":"Matthew Wallace, Courtney Franklin, Joseph Harrison","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldaf014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Empirical evidence on migrant morbidity suggests that migrant populations have a higher burden of disease compared to non-migrants in high-income destination countries. Yet, empirical evidence on migrant mortality typically shows a lower risk of death compared to non-migrants. Migrants might be living longer lives in worse health-a 'migrant \"morbidity-mortality\" paradox'.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>Peer-reviewed, English-language publications.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>The paradox has been reported in different destinations, across different migrant groups, and across different health outcomes. It presents most consistently among migrants and women born in low and middle-income countries, and/or when morbidity is self-reported.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The majority of the evidence is based upon unlinked, aggregated, cross-sectional prevalence data that has well-known limitations. Nearly all the studies to date have been descriptive, and there is a lack of understanding concerning what might explain this paradox among migrants.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>That migrants are living longer subject to a higher burden of diseases is a social and public health concern that needs to be further explored and understood through more research.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>We need more evidence of the paradox based upon linked individual-level, incidence-based data that compares the morbidity and mortality risks of the same migrant and non-migrant populations using objective data on morbidity from primary care (general practitioners) or secondary care (hospitalizations). We need to know how widespread the paradox is, which migrant populations are most affected by it, and the potential mechanisms responsible for it.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"156 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaf014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Empirical evidence on migrant morbidity suggests that migrant populations have a higher burden of disease compared to non-migrants in high-income destination countries. Yet, empirical evidence on migrant mortality typically shows a lower risk of death compared to non-migrants. Migrants might be living longer lives in worse health-a 'migrant "morbidity-mortality" paradox'.

Sources of data: Peer-reviewed, English-language publications.

Areas of agreement: The paradox has been reported in different destinations, across different migrant groups, and across different health outcomes. It presents most consistently among migrants and women born in low and middle-income countries, and/or when morbidity is self-reported.

Areas of controversy: The majority of the evidence is based upon unlinked, aggregated, cross-sectional prevalence data that has well-known limitations. Nearly all the studies to date have been descriptive, and there is a lack of understanding concerning what might explain this paradox among migrants.

Growing points: That migrants are living longer subject to a higher burden of diseases is a social and public health concern that needs to be further explored and understood through more research.

Areas timely for developing research: We need more evidence of the paradox based upon linked individual-level, incidence-based data that compares the morbidity and mortality risks of the same migrant and non-migrant populations using objective data on morbidity from primary care (general practitioners) or secondary care (hospitalizations). We need to know how widespread the paradox is, which migrant populations are most affected by it, and the potential mechanisms responsible for it.

长寿,健康不佳?对国际移民证据的全面审查。
导言:关于移民发病率的经验证据表明,与高收入目的地国的非移民相比,移民人口的疾病负担更高。然而,关于移民死亡率的经验证据通常表明,与非移民相比,移民的死亡风险较低。移民的寿命可能更长,但健康状况更差——这是一个“移民发病率-死亡率悖论”。数据来源:同行评审的英文出版物。一致的领域:在不同的目的地、不同的移徙群体和不同的健康结果中报告了这种矛盾。在低收入和中等收入国家出生的移徙者和妇女以及(或)自我报告发病率时,这种情况最为普遍。争议领域:大多数证据是基于无关联的、汇总的、横断面的流行率数据,这些数据具有众所周知的局限性。迄今为止,几乎所有的研究都是描述性的,对于如何解释移民之间的这种悖论,人们缺乏理解。要点:移徙者寿命更长,疾病负担更重,这是一个社会和公共卫生问题,需要通过更多的研究进一步探索和了解。及时开展研究的领域:我们需要更多的证据来证明这一悖论,这些证据基于相关的个人层面、基于发病率的数据,这些数据使用初级保健(全科医生)或二级保健(住院)发病率的客观数据来比较相同的移民和非移民人口的发病率和死亡率风险。我们需要知道这种悖论有多普遍,哪些移民人口受其影响最大,以及造成这种悖论的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British medical bulletin
British medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信