Influence of discordant tubal blockage on clinical pregnancy rates: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Franziska Elisabeth Bormann, Marlene Hager, Sophie Luise Thieme, John Preston Parry, Johannes Ott
{"title":"Influence of discordant tubal blockage on clinical pregnancy rates: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Franziska Elisabeth Bormann, Marlene Hager, Sophie Luise Thieme, John Preston Parry, Johannes Ott","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08186-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To present recent data on discordant tubal blockage (DTB), its influence on pregnancy rates and how women should gage their fertility when screening and diagnostic tests don't always agree.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 78 infertile women, who underwent tubal patency assessment between January 2016 and June 2024 at the Clinical Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University of Vienna. Tubal patency was assessed twice. Initial assessment of tubal patency had been performed by hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) or hysterosalpingography (HSG) and had suggested bilateral occlusion in the DTB group (n = 38) and bilateral patency in controls (n = 38). Bilateral patency was found in all patients during subsequent laparoscopic chromopertubation. The primary outcome parameter was the clinical pregnancy rate within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The basic patient characteristics showed no significant differences between the DTB and the control groups. Clinical pregnancy was found in 47.4% (18/38) of control patients (patent tubes) and in 21.1% (8/38) of DTB patients (p = 0.029) over 6 months of follow-ups. In a multivariate model, younger age [odds ratio (OR), 0.856, p = 0.013] and bilateral patency (OR 4.210, p = 0.010) in both examinations (control group) were associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DTB reflects lower fecundity even when subsequent patency is demonstrated. Tubal patency following prior occlusion should not be grounds for complete reassurance, and given lower odds of pregnancy, such patients may be warranted a faster transition to ART given the decreased efficacy of other methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08186-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To present recent data on discordant tubal blockage (DTB), its influence on pregnancy rates and how women should gage their fertility when screening and diagnostic tests don't always agree.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 78 infertile women, who underwent tubal patency assessment between January 2016 and June 2024 at the Clinical Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University of Vienna. Tubal patency was assessed twice. Initial assessment of tubal patency had been performed by hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) or hysterosalpingography (HSG) and had suggested bilateral occlusion in the DTB group (n = 38) and bilateral patency in controls (n = 38). Bilateral patency was found in all patients during subsequent laparoscopic chromopertubation. The primary outcome parameter was the clinical pregnancy rate within 6 months.

Results: The basic patient characteristics showed no significant differences between the DTB and the control groups. Clinical pregnancy was found in 47.4% (18/38) of control patients (patent tubes) and in 21.1% (8/38) of DTB patients (p = 0.029) over 6 months of follow-ups. In a multivariate model, younger age [odds ratio (OR), 0.856, p = 0.013] and bilateral patency (OR 4.210, p = 0.010) in both examinations (control group) were associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates.

Conclusion: DTB reflects lower fecundity even when subsequent patency is demonstrated. Tubal patency following prior occlusion should not be grounds for complete reassurance, and given lower odds of pregnancy, such patients may be warranted a faster transition to ART given the decreased efficacy of other methods.

不一致输卵管阻塞对临床妊娠率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:介绍不一致性输卵管阻塞(DTB)的最新数据,其对妊娠率的影响,以及当筛查和诊断测试不总是一致时,妇女应该如何衡量自己的生育能力。方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了78名不孕妇女,这些妇女于2016年1月至2024年6月在维也纳医科大学妇科内分泌与生殖医学临床科接受了输卵管通畅评估。评估输卵管通畅度2次。通过子宫输卵管造影(HyCoSy)或子宫输卵管造影(HSG)对输卵管通畅进行初步评估,发现DTB组双侧闭塞(n = 38),对照组双侧通畅(n = 38)。所有患者在随后的腹腔镜插管中均发现双侧通畅。主要结局参数为6个月内的临床妊娠率。结果:DTB患者基本特征与对照组无显著差异。随访6个月后,对照组(未插管)患者临床妊娠率为47.4% (18/38),DTB患者为21.1% (8/38)(p = 0.029)。在多变量模型中,两项检查中年龄较小[比值比(OR), 0.856, p = 0.013]和双侧通畅(OR 4.210, p = 0.010)(对照组)与较高的临床妊娠率相关。结论:DTB反映了较低的生育能力,即使随后显示通畅。先前阻断后输卵管通畅不应作为完全保证的依据,鉴于妊娠几率较低,鉴于其他方法的疗效下降,这类患者可能需要更快地过渡到ART。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信