Repurposing rupatadine as topical treatment against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Asmaa Farag, Dalia El-Damasy, Dalia Soliman, Galal Yahya, Kareem Ibrahim
{"title":"Repurposing rupatadine as topical treatment against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.","authors":"Asmaa Farag, Dalia El-Damasy, Dalia Soliman, Galal Yahya, Kareem Ibrahim","doi":"10.1186/s13568-025-01947-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the potential of repurposed non-antibiotic drugs as possible treatments for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin infection, through a comprehensive approach combining in silico, in vitro, and in vivo methodologies. From 198 protein targets previously identified through multi-omics analysis, 10 essential, druggable, broad-spectrum targets were selected. Three promising non-antibiotic ligands (rupatadine, orlistat, and citric acid) were evaluated through minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), molecular docking, cytotoxicity testing, and a murine model of MRSA skin infection. Rupatadine, orlistat, and citric acid showed MICs of 0.031 mg/mL, 1.5 mg/mL, and 2.5 mg/mL, respectively. Rupatadine demonstrated the most potent anti-MRSA activity, with molecular docking revealing favorable binding energy (- 3.45 kcal/mol) to Aminoacyl transferase (FemA). Serial passage experiments over eight passages showed no resistance development against rupatadine in one MRSA strain and only twofold increase in another, compared to 8-13 fold increases observed with conventional antibiotics. Checkerboard assays revealed synergistic effects between rupatadine and β-lactam antibiotics (cefazolin and cefotaxime, FICI = 0.3). FemA is essential in cell wall biosynthesis and represents an essential target for anti-MRSA agents. Functional enrichment and pathway network analyses revealed significant disruption of biological processes governing peptidoglycan biosynthesis and cell wall biogenesis, which indicates the possibility of rupatadine compromising S. aureus cell wall integrity through interference with peptidoglycan assembly pathways, supporting its potential as a repurposed anti-MRSA agent. Rupatadine showed favorable tolerance on human skin fibroblast cells (IC<sub>50</sub>: 1150 µg/mL), and significantly reduced bacterial count in a murine model.</p>","PeriodicalId":7537,"journal":{"name":"AMB Express","volume":"15 1","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMB Express","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-025-01947-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the potential of repurposed non-antibiotic drugs as possible treatments for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin infection, through a comprehensive approach combining in silico, in vitro, and in vivo methodologies. From 198 protein targets previously identified through multi-omics analysis, 10 essential, druggable, broad-spectrum targets were selected. Three promising non-antibiotic ligands (rupatadine, orlistat, and citric acid) were evaluated through minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), molecular docking, cytotoxicity testing, and a murine model of MRSA skin infection. Rupatadine, orlistat, and citric acid showed MICs of 0.031 mg/mL, 1.5 mg/mL, and 2.5 mg/mL, respectively. Rupatadine demonstrated the most potent anti-MRSA activity, with molecular docking revealing favorable binding energy (- 3.45 kcal/mol) to Aminoacyl transferase (FemA). Serial passage experiments over eight passages showed no resistance development against rupatadine in one MRSA strain and only twofold increase in another, compared to 8-13 fold increases observed with conventional antibiotics. Checkerboard assays revealed synergistic effects between rupatadine and β-lactam antibiotics (cefazolin and cefotaxime, FICI = 0.3). FemA is essential in cell wall biosynthesis and represents an essential target for anti-MRSA agents. Functional enrichment and pathway network analyses revealed significant disruption of biological processes governing peptidoglycan biosynthesis and cell wall biogenesis, which indicates the possibility of rupatadine compromising S. aureus cell wall integrity through interference with peptidoglycan assembly pathways, supporting its potential as a repurposed anti-MRSA agent. Rupatadine showed favorable tolerance on human skin fibroblast cells (IC50: 1150 µg/mL), and significantly reduced bacterial count in a murine model.

重新利用鲁帕他定作为局部治疗抗甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌。
本研究通过计算机、体外和体内的综合方法,评估了非抗生素药物作为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)皮肤感染的可能治疗方法的潜力。从先前通过多组学分析确定的198个蛋白靶点中,选择了10个必需的、可药物的、广谱的靶点。通过最小抑制浓度(MIC)、最小杀菌浓度(MBC)、分子对接、细胞毒性测试和MRSA皮肤感染小鼠模型,对三种有前景的非抗生素配体(鲁帕他定、奥利司他和柠檬酸)进行了评估。鲁帕他定、奥利司他和柠檬酸的mic分别为0.031 mg/mL、1.5 mg/mL和2.5 mg/mL。鲁帕他定显示出最有效的抗mrsa活性,分子对接显示出良好的结合能(- 3.45 kcal/mol)到氨基酰基转移酶(FemA)。8代的连续传代实验显示,一株MRSA菌株对鲁帕他定没有产生耐药性,而另一株MRSA菌株对鲁帕他定的耐药性仅增加了两倍,而传统抗生素的耐药性增加了8-13倍。棋盘格试验显示鲁帕他定与β-内酰胺类抗生素(头孢唑林和头孢噻肟,FICI = 0.3)具有协同效应。FemA在细胞壁生物合成中是必不可少的,是抗mrsa药物的重要靶点。功能富集和途径网络分析显示,控制肽聚糖生物合成和细胞壁生物发生的生物过程明显中断,这表明鲁帕他定可能通过干扰肽聚糖组装途径损害金黄色葡萄球菌细胞壁完整性,支持其作为一种重新用途的抗mrsa药物的潜力。鲁帕他定对人皮肤成纤维细胞表现出良好的耐受性(IC50: 1150µg/mL),并在小鼠模型中显著减少细菌计数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AMB Express
AMB Express BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: AMB Express is a high quality journal that brings together research in the area of Applied and Industrial Microbiology with a particular interest in ''White Biotechnology'' and ''Red Biotechnology''. The emphasis is on processes employing microorganisms, eukaryotic cell cultures or enzymes for the biosynthesis, transformation and degradation of compounds. This includes fine and bulk chemicals, polymeric compounds and enzymes or other proteins. Downstream processes are also considered. Integrated processes combining biochemical and chemical processes are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信