Title: Prescription Trends of Hydrochlorothiazide vs. Chlorthalidone in the United States (2019-2024).

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
R Asante, Z Yao, O Dzaye, P Berning, Y Jelwan, S Burka, R S Blumenthal, M J Blaha
{"title":"Title: Prescription Trends of Hydrochlorothiazide vs. Chlorthalidone in the United States (2019-2024).","authors":"R Asante, Z Yao, O Dzaye, P Berning, Y Jelwan, S Burka, R S Blumenthal, M J Blaha","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone have been cornerstones of hypertension management for decades. Given the historical debate about their comparative effectiveness and cardiovascular outcomes, as well as recent clinical trial evidence, we studied prescription trends to assess the association of prescribing patterns with evolving knowledge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed prescriptions of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone from January 2019 to December 2024 using IQVIA's National Prescription Audit (NPA). Interrupted Time Series (ITS) analysis assessed inflections in prescribing practice around the December 2022 Diuretic Comparison Project (DCP) findings and the August 2020 hydrochlorothiazide US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) non-melanoma skin cancer warning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, 3,734,790 hydrochlorothiazide and 543,402 chlorthalidone prescriptions were dispensed, a 7:1 ratio. A drop of 503,367 hydrochlorothiazide prescriptions (14%; 95% CI: -673,109 to -333,624) was observed in the first month after the FDA's warning, and the pre-warning 43,913 (95% CI: 31,701 to 56,125) monthly increase reversed to a monthly decline of 13,546 (95% CI: -16,137 to -10,954) prescriptions post-warning. After the DCP report, a slowdown of 2,738 (95% CI: -4,472 to -1,004) monthly prescriptions for chlorthalidone was seen, reducing the rate of monthly increase from 3,602 (95% CI: 1916 to 5289) to 864 (95% CI: 431 to 1298). Monthly hydrochlorothiazide prescriptions declined to -20,124 (95% CI: -26285 to -13962) post DCP report.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FDA warning and DCP report were associated with a decline in hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone prescriptions, while the DCP report slowed chlorthalidone prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone have been cornerstones of hypertension management for decades. Given the historical debate about their comparative effectiveness and cardiovascular outcomes, as well as recent clinical trial evidence, we studied prescription trends to assess the association of prescribing patterns with evolving knowledge.

Methods: We analyzed prescriptions of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone from January 2019 to December 2024 using IQVIA's National Prescription Audit (NPA). Interrupted Time Series (ITS) analysis assessed inflections in prescribing practice around the December 2022 Diuretic Comparison Project (DCP) findings and the August 2020 hydrochlorothiazide US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) non-melanoma skin cancer warning.

Results: On average, 3,734,790 hydrochlorothiazide and 543,402 chlorthalidone prescriptions were dispensed, a 7:1 ratio. A drop of 503,367 hydrochlorothiazide prescriptions (14%; 95% CI: -673,109 to -333,624) was observed in the first month after the FDA's warning, and the pre-warning 43,913 (95% CI: 31,701 to 56,125) monthly increase reversed to a monthly decline of 13,546 (95% CI: -16,137 to -10,954) prescriptions post-warning. After the DCP report, a slowdown of 2,738 (95% CI: -4,472 to -1,004) monthly prescriptions for chlorthalidone was seen, reducing the rate of monthly increase from 3,602 (95% CI: 1916 to 5289) to 864 (95% CI: 431 to 1298). Monthly hydrochlorothiazide prescriptions declined to -20,124 (95% CI: -26285 to -13962) post DCP report.

Conclusion: The FDA warning and DCP report were associated with a decline in hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone prescriptions, while the DCP report slowed chlorthalidone prescribing.

标题:美国氢氯噻嗪与氯噻酮的处方趋势(2019-2024)。
背景:几十年来,氢氯噻嗪和氯噻酮一直是高血压治疗的基石。鉴于关于它们的比较有效性和心血管结果的历史争论,以及最近的临床试验证据,我们研究了处方趋势,以评估处方模式与不断发展的知识之间的关系。方法:利用IQVIA国家处方审计(NPA)对2019年1月至2024年12月的氢氯噻嗪和氯噻酮处方进行分析。中断时间序列(ITS)分析评估了2022年12月利尿剂比较项目(DCP)发现和2020年8月氢氯噻嗪美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)非黑色素瘤皮肤癌警告前后处方实践的变化。结果:平均发放氢氯噻嗪处方3734790张,氯噻酮处方543402张,比例为7:1。在FDA发出警告后的第一个月,观察到氢氯噻嗪处方减少了503,367张(14%;95% CI: -673,109至-333,624),预警前每月增加43,913张(95% CI: 31,701至56,125),预警后每月减少13,546张(95% CI: -16,137至-10,954)。在DCP报告之后,氯噻酮的每月处方减少了2,738张(95% CI: -4,472至-1,004),使每月的增长率从3,602张(95% CI: 1916至5289)减少到864张(95% CI: 431至1298)。DCP报告后,每月氢氯噻嗪处方下降至- 20124 (95% CI: -26285至-13962)。结论:FDA警告和DCP报告与氢氯噻嗪和氯噻酮处方的减少有关,而DCP报告则减缓了氯噻酮的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信