Turkish Adaptation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability Study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Bahar Karakoç, Nuray Turan
{"title":"Turkish Adaptation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability Study.","authors":"Bahar Karakoç, Nuray Turan","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The presence or absence of pressure injury is generally considered a quality measure of nursing care performance. This study aimed to adapt the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire to the Turkish version and to determine its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A methodological study design was used. The instrument was translated into Turkish and back-translated into English. The questionnaire's language equivalence, content validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity were evaluated. The research was conducted with 600 nurses at a university hospital who volunteered to participate. The number, percentage distributions, intraclass correlation coefficient, kappa coefficient test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten experts in wound care evaluated content validity, and the content validity index was 0.92. The intraclass correlation coefficients obtained for all subdimensions of the questionnaire and the overall questionnaire were high. As a result of factor analysis, the questionnaire was grouped under 3 factors as in the original questionnaire. The questionnaire's overall internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach α) was highly reliable, with a coefficient of 0.914.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for cross-cultural studies to identify barriers faced by nurses in preventing pressure injuries in patients. It will contribute to the identification of barriers and the determination of strategies for solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The presence or absence of pressure injury is generally considered a quality measure of nursing care performance. This study aimed to adapt the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire to the Turkish version and to determine its validity and reliability.

Methods: A methodological study design was used. The instrument was translated into Turkish and back-translated into English. The questionnaire's language equivalence, content validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity were evaluated. The research was conducted with 600 nurses at a university hospital who volunteered to participate. The number, percentage distributions, intraclass correlation coefficient, kappa coefficient test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze the data.

Results: Ten experts in wound care evaluated content validity, and the content validity index was 0.92. The intraclass correlation coefficients obtained for all subdimensions of the questionnaire and the overall questionnaire were high. As a result of factor analysis, the questionnaire was grouped under 3 factors as in the original questionnaire. The questionnaire's overall internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach α) was highly reliable, with a coefficient of 0.914.

Conclusions: This questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for cross-cultural studies to identify barriers faced by nurses in preventing pressure injuries in patients. It will contribute to the identification of barriers and the determination of strategies for solutions.

土耳其对压力伤害预防障碍问卷的适应性:效度和信度研究。
目的:压伤的存在与否通常被认为是衡量护理效果的质量指标。本研究的目的是适应压力伤害预防障碍问卷土耳其文版,并确定其效度和信度。方法:采用方法学研究设计。这个乐器被翻译成土耳其语,又被反翻译成英语。评估问卷的语言等效性、内容效度、重测信度、内部一致性和构念效度。这项研究是由一所大学医院的600名护士自愿参与的。采用数量分布、百分比分布、类内相关系数、kappa系数检验和Mann-Whitney U检验对数据进行分析。结果:10位创面护理专家对内容效度进行评价,内容效度指数为0.92。问卷各子维度与整体问卷的类内相关系数均较高。通过因子分析,问卷与原问卷一样被分为3个因子。问卷整体内部一致性系数(Cronbach α)为高信度,系数为0.914。结论:该问卷是跨文化研究中有效可靠的工具,可用于识别护士在预防患者压力损伤方面面临的障碍。它将有助于查明障碍和确定解决问题的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信