A systematic review of income and education reporting in psychedelic clinical trials

IF 8.7
Daniel H. Grossman, Kevin R. Madden, Nicky J. Mehtani, Brian T. Anderson, Lori L. Davis, Jennifer M. Mitchell, Peter S. Hendricks
{"title":"A systematic review of income and education reporting in psychedelic clinical trials","authors":"Daniel H. Grossman, Kevin R. Madden, Nicky J. Mehtani, Brian T. Anderson, Lori L. Davis, Jennifer M. Mitchell, Peter S. Hendricks","doi":"10.1038/s44220-025-00417-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Socioeconomic status (SES) substantially influences mental health outcomes and treatment access, yet its reporting in psychedelic-assisted therapy trials remains underexplored. Here we systematically reviewed 98 articles (49 primary trials and 49 secondary analyses) published between 2006 and 2024 examining classic psychedelics and MDMA for mental health conditions. Only 12% of primary trials reported participant income data, and 31% reported educational attainment. In US-based trials, participants showed markedly higher SES than the general population: 93% had some college education (versus 62% nationally), and median incomes in major trials substantially exceeded the national median for all workers. Non-US trials showed variable patterns. This widespread underreporting of SES data and evidence of socioeconomic disparities, particularly in US trials, highlights an urgent need for standardized SES reporting and targeted strategies to improve socioeconomic diversity in psychedelic-assisted therapy research, ensuring broader generalizability and access to these emerging treatments. This systematic review analyzes how income and educational attainment are reported in psychedelic-assisted therapy trials. It reveals that only a minority of trials report this information and, when reported, the data have considerable variation in format and ambiguity in details. It also reveals disparities, with participants having higher income and being highly educated overrepresented in trials.","PeriodicalId":74247,"journal":{"name":"Nature mental health","volume":"3 5","pages":"567-574"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-025-00417-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) substantially influences mental health outcomes and treatment access, yet its reporting in psychedelic-assisted therapy trials remains underexplored. Here we systematically reviewed 98 articles (49 primary trials and 49 secondary analyses) published between 2006 and 2024 examining classic psychedelics and MDMA for mental health conditions. Only 12% of primary trials reported participant income data, and 31% reported educational attainment. In US-based trials, participants showed markedly higher SES than the general population: 93% had some college education (versus 62% nationally), and median incomes in major trials substantially exceeded the national median for all workers. Non-US trials showed variable patterns. This widespread underreporting of SES data and evidence of socioeconomic disparities, particularly in US trials, highlights an urgent need for standardized SES reporting and targeted strategies to improve socioeconomic diversity in psychedelic-assisted therapy research, ensuring broader generalizability and access to these emerging treatments. This systematic review analyzes how income and educational attainment are reported in psychedelic-assisted therapy trials. It reveals that only a minority of trials report this information and, when reported, the data have considerable variation in format and ambiguity in details. It also reveals disparities, with participants having higher income and being highly educated overrepresented in trials.

Abstract Image

对致幻剂临床试验中收入和教育程度报告的系统回顾
社会经济地位(SES)在很大程度上影响心理健康结果和治疗的可及性,但其在迷幻剂辅助治疗试验中的报道仍未得到充分探讨。在这里,我们系统地回顾了2006年至2024年间发表的98篇文章(49篇主要试验和49篇次要分析),研究了经典致幻剂和MDMA对精神健康状况的影响。只有12%的初级试验报告了参与者的收入数据,31%报告了受教育程度。在美国的试验中,参与者的社会地位明显高于一般人群:93%的人受过大学教育(全国为62%),主要试验中的收入中位数大大超过了全国所有工人的收入中位数。非美国的试验显示出不同的模式。这种普遍的SES数据少报告和社会经济差异证据,特别是在美国的试验中,突出了迫切需要标准化的SES报告和有针对性的策略,以提高迷幻剂辅助治疗研究的社会经济多样性,确保更广泛的推广和获得这些新兴治疗方法。本系统综述分析了在迷幻剂辅助治疗试验中收入和教育程度是如何被报道的。它表明,只有少数试验报告了这一信息,并且,当报告时,数据在格式和细节上有相当大的差异。它还揭示了差异,参与者收入较高,受过高等教育,在试验中的比例过高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信