Ten principles for transforming economics in a time of global crises

IF 27.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jasper O. Kenter, Simone Martino, Sam J. Buckton, Sandra Waddock, Bina Agarwal, Annela Anger-Kraavi, Robert Costanza, Adam P. Hejnowicz, Peter Jones, Jordan O. Lafayette, Jane Kabubo-Mariara, Nibedita Mukherjee, Kate E. Pickett, Chris Riedy, Steve Waddell
{"title":"Ten principles for transforming economics in a time of global crises","authors":"Jasper O. Kenter, Simone Martino, Sam J. Buckton, Sandra Waddock, Bina Agarwal, Annela Anger-Kraavi, Robert Costanza, Adam P. Hejnowicz, Peter Jones, Jordan O. Lafayette, Jane Kabubo-Mariara, Nibedita Mukherjee, Kate E. Pickett, Chris Riedy, Steve Waddell","doi":"10.1038/s41893-025-01562-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transformation of economic systems is widely regarded as essential for tackling interacting global crises. Unconventional economic approaches seeking holistic human and planetary well-being have transformative potential, but mainstreaming them is hampered by vested interests and intellectual lock-ins. They are also diffuse and struggle to develop sufficient discursive power to gain more widespread traction in policy. To bring coherence, we undertake a qualitative content analysis of 238 document sources from science and practice. We identify ten ecological, social, political economy and holistic principles cutting across 38 economic approaches. They include: (1) social–ecological embeddedness and holistic well-being; (2) interdisciplinarity and complexity thinking; (3) limits to growth; (4) limited substitutability of natural capital; (5) regenerative design; (6) holistic perspectives of people and values; (7) equity, equality and justice; (8) relationality and social enfranchisement; (9) participation, deliberation and cooperation and (10) post-capitalism and decolonization. We also consider opportunities and barriers to applying these principles in the context of global crises. Our results can help consolidate transformative economic approaches and support future efforts to synthesize conceptual models, methodologies and policy solutions and to validate the identified principles more explicitly within global south contexts. Unconventional economic approaches with transformative potential for sustainability are too dispersed to gain sufficient traction in policy. With qualitative content analysis, this study brings coherence to many documents discussing such approaches to support efforts towards mainstreaming them.","PeriodicalId":19056,"journal":{"name":"Nature Sustainability","volume":"8 7","pages":"837-847"},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-025-01562-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-025-01562-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transformation of economic systems is widely regarded as essential for tackling interacting global crises. Unconventional economic approaches seeking holistic human and planetary well-being have transformative potential, but mainstreaming them is hampered by vested interests and intellectual lock-ins. They are also diffuse and struggle to develop sufficient discursive power to gain more widespread traction in policy. To bring coherence, we undertake a qualitative content analysis of 238 document sources from science and practice. We identify ten ecological, social, political economy and holistic principles cutting across 38 economic approaches. They include: (1) social–ecological embeddedness and holistic well-being; (2) interdisciplinarity and complexity thinking; (3) limits to growth; (4) limited substitutability of natural capital; (5) regenerative design; (6) holistic perspectives of people and values; (7) equity, equality and justice; (8) relationality and social enfranchisement; (9) participation, deliberation and cooperation and (10) post-capitalism and decolonization. We also consider opportunities and barriers to applying these principles in the context of global crises. Our results can help consolidate transformative economic approaches and support future efforts to synthesize conceptual models, methodologies and policy solutions and to validate the identified principles more explicitly within global south contexts. Unconventional economic approaches with transformative potential for sustainability are too dispersed to gain sufficient traction in policy. With qualitative content analysis, this study brings coherence to many documents discussing such approaches to support efforts towards mainstreaming them.

Abstract Image

在全球危机时期改变经济学的十大原则
经济体制的转型被广泛认为是解决相互影响的全球危机的关键。寻求人类和地球整体福祉的非常规经济方法具有变革潜力,但将其纳入主流受到既得利益和知识锁定的阻碍。它们也是分散的,难以发展出足够的话语权,以在政策上获得更广泛的牵引力。为了保持一致性,我们对来自科学和实践的238个文献来源进行了定性内容分析。我们确定了十项生态、社会、政治经济和整体原则,涵盖了38种经济方法。它们包括:(1)社会生态嵌入性和整体幸福感;(2)跨学科和复杂性思维;(3)生长限制;(4)自然资本可替代性有限;(5)再生设计;(6)人与价值观的整体观;(七)公平、平等、正义;(8)关系与社会解放;(9)参与、审议和合作;(10)后资本主义和非殖民化。我们还考虑在全球危机背景下应用这些原则的机会和障碍。我们的研究结果可以帮助巩固变革的经济方法,支持未来综合概念模型、方法和政策解决方案的努力,并在全球南方背景下更明确地验证已确定的原则。具有可持续性变革潜力的非常规经济方法过于分散,无法在政策上获得足够的牵引力。通过定性内容分析,本研究使许多讨论此类方法的文件具有连贯性,以支持将其纳入主流的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Sustainability
Nature Sustainability Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Nature Sustainability aims to facilitate cross-disciplinary dialogues and bring together research fields that contribute to understanding how we organize our lives in a finite world and the impacts of our actions. Nature Sustainability will not only publish fundamental research but also significant investigations into policies and solutions for ensuring human well-being now and in the future.Its ultimate goal is to address the greatest challenges of our time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信