A symposium on power in experiments – new practical insights and tools: preface

IF 1.3 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Monica Costa Dias, Marcos Vera-Hernández
{"title":"A symposium on power in experiments – new practical insights and tools: preface","authors":"Monica Costa Dias,&nbsp;Marcos Vera-Hernández","doi":"10.1111/1475-5890.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of randomised control trials (RCTs) has become widespread in economics and other social sciences, and is likely to grow further as new digital tools and increasingly rich data facilitate the design and implementation of experiments. When rigorously designed and implemented, they have the potential to offer the most reliable empirical evidence on the causal impact of an intervention. But for that potential to be realised, RCTs need to be sufficiently powered to detect a meaningful effect, or to say confidently that the effect is negligible. This symposium offers practical insights for researchers on designing more powerful experiments and computing the required sample size, accompanied by tools that researchers can use in designing their own RCTs.</p><p>The first paper, by David McKenzie, discusses how to improve power at each stage of an RCT – design, implementation and analysis. While increasing sample size is the default option, McKenzie offers guidance on many other options available to researchers and why they work. The second paper, by Brendon McConnell and Marcos Vera-Hernández, dives into detailed aspects of implementing sample size calculations for different randomisation designs, and offers the formulae, tools and computer code necessary to implement them in practice. The final paper, by Brandon Hauser and Mauricio Olivares, studies hypothesis testing in randomised experiments, and its consequences for sample size calculations. The paper shows how small deviations from the most standard assumptions invalidate standard randomisation-based inference, and provides useful results and guidance for how to adapt power analysis to ensure that calculations remain valid.</p>","PeriodicalId":51602,"journal":{"name":"Fiscal Studies","volume":"46 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-5890.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiscal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-5890.70007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of randomised control trials (RCTs) has become widespread in economics and other social sciences, and is likely to grow further as new digital tools and increasingly rich data facilitate the design and implementation of experiments. When rigorously designed and implemented, they have the potential to offer the most reliable empirical evidence on the causal impact of an intervention. But for that potential to be realised, RCTs need to be sufficiently powered to detect a meaningful effect, or to say confidently that the effect is negligible. This symposium offers practical insights for researchers on designing more powerful experiments and computing the required sample size, accompanied by tools that researchers can use in designing their own RCTs.

The first paper, by David McKenzie, discusses how to improve power at each stage of an RCT – design, implementation and analysis. While increasing sample size is the default option, McKenzie offers guidance on many other options available to researchers and why they work. The second paper, by Brendon McConnell and Marcos Vera-Hernández, dives into detailed aspects of implementing sample size calculations for different randomisation designs, and offers the formulae, tools and computer code necessary to implement them in practice. The final paper, by Brandon Hauser and Mauricio Olivares, studies hypothesis testing in randomised experiments, and its consequences for sample size calculations. The paper shows how small deviations from the most standard assumptions invalidate standard randomisation-based inference, and provides useful results and guidance for how to adapt power analysis to ensure that calculations remain valid.

Abstract Image

关于实验中的权力的研讨会-新的实践见解和工具:前言
随机对照试验(rct)的使用在经济学和其他社会科学中已经变得广泛,并且随着新的数字工具和日益丰富的数据促进实验的设计和实施,rct的使用可能会进一步增加。当严格设计和实施时,它们有可能为干预的因果影响提供最可靠的经验证据。但要实现这一潜力,随机对照试验需要有足够的能力来检测到有意义的影响,或者自信地说这种影响可以忽略不计。本次研讨会为研究人员提供了设计更强大的实验和计算所需样本量的实用见解,并提供了研究人员可以在设计自己的随机对照试验时使用的工具。第一篇论文由David McKenzie撰写,讨论了如何在随机对照试验的每个阶段——设计、实施和分析——提高疗效。虽然增加样本量是默认选项,但麦肯齐为研究人员提供了许多其他可用选项以及它们为什么有效的指导。第二篇论文由Brendon McConnell和Marcos Vera-Hernández撰写,深入研究了不同随机化设计中实施样本量计算的细节,并提供了在实践中实施这些设计所需的公式、工具和计算机代码。最后一篇论文由布兰登·豪瑟(Brandon Hauser)和毛里西奥·奥利瓦雷斯(Mauricio Olivares)撰写,研究了随机实验中的假设检验及其对样本量计算的影响。本文展示了与最标准假设的微小偏差如何使基于随机化的标准推断失效,并为如何调整功率分析以确保计算保持有效提供了有用的结果和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fiscal Studies
Fiscal Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
1.40%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The Institute for Fiscal Studies publishes the journal Fiscal Studies, which serves as a bridge between academic research and policy. This esteemed journal, established in 1979, has gained global recognition for its publication of high-quality and original research papers. The articles, authored by prominent academics, policymakers, and practitioners, are presented in an accessible format, ensuring a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信